• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
Owned jointly by Oliver Strasse and Kazimierz Reczynski, the Independent is based in Eutopia City. Operating under a proudly right-wing agenda, the paper does claim, however, to operate without bias in the presentation of its news items. The same cannot be said about its editorials.

Editors: Oliver Strasse, Kazimierz Reczynski
 

Sterkarm

The Honorable Judge Mental
44 Badges
Feb 13, 2004
2.279
0
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Together for Victory
  • Stellaris - Path to Destruction bundle
  • Surviving Mars
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Death or Dishonor
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Stellaris: Humanoids Species Pack
  • Stellaris: Apocalypse
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rule Britannia
  • Surviving Mars: Digital Deluxe Edition
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Fury
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Expansion Pass
  • Hearts of Iron IV: La Resistance
  • Stellaris: Federations
  • Crusader Kings III
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Deus Vult
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Rome Gold
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Rome: Vae Victis
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Crusader Kings II: Holy Knight (pre-order)
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
Hawkton Tilly Upset in Election!

Hawkton Tilly, Former MDIS and MGA, lost the election to Josephus L. Sergei, by a close margin. Tilly, running on the UMP ticket and receiving support from CUE, was slated to win, though it was thought it would be a very close election still. The UMP in general took a massive hit in the election. They lost nearly 4 GA seats, and are now the minority to CUE and ESA in the GA.

Conservatives of all types will soon be seen jumping into the ocean and trying to swim to America. At least Sergei will have a difficult time imposing martial law with no military.

CUE Wins GA in a Shocking Election

The Conservative Union for Eutopia has upset the UMP to gain 3 seats, tying for the majority in the GA. CUE member Kazimierz Recyznski commented, "I was expecting only 2, and frankly, I was prepared to only get one seat. I'm very pleased that for once I won't have a UMP majority blocking everything I try to pass."

CUE, a newly created party, has surpassed the old UMP and P4P parties, but ESA equaled it in GA seats. However, with Sergei as President, the ESA is the dominant party in the government right now. Only time will tell what will happen with this term, under Josephus L. Sergei, constant critic of the administration. He's gone from being the opposition to being The Man, and it will be interesting to see him in this role.
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
Change of Leadership, Change of Direction?

After a poor showing in the recent General Assembly elections, the upper echelons of the CUE have decided that a change of leadership is necessary. Former President Talbott, now a Cabinet Minister in President de Fourgéres' administration, has stepped down in favour of junior party member, Oliver Strasse - a Catholic entrepreneur from Eutopia City. It is understood by the editor of The Independent that Strasse has offered the Deputy Chairmanship to Talbott - perhaps in an effort to reconcile the more moderate wing of the party with the free-market radicalism and vehement anti-socialism of Strasse himself.

It is understood that Strasse wishes to push through immediate reforms of the party leadership, appointing junior party members to shadow ministers in Government, and also to review the current party platform. In this end, he has called an Extraordinary General Party Meeting, detailing its purpose in the following press statement.

PRESS STATEMENT FROM THE CHAIRMAN OF THE CONSERVATIVE UNION OF EUTOPIA​

Reform, or at least movement towards reform, is the top of the agenda in the CUE today. We have felt the joy of electoral triumph. But we have also felt the pain of electoral despair. How can we purport to represent the vast swathe of conservative opinion across our nation with a single MGA? How can we possibly declare that we are holding the UMP and de Fourgéres to account when their dominance of the legislative chamber is so distinct? We cannot. But we must.

In this end, this reform that I have spoken of must go ahead. I am calling an Extraordinary General Party Meeting at our headquarters in Eutopia City to discuss and ballot all members on a series of changes to our party platform, and also of the creation of new system of elections to the party leadership. It is imperative that all interested members attend so that their branch of party opinion may not be left asunder. We are a Conservative Union after all. New members are welcome to attend also. They will be the life-blood of the party into the future. They must be party to our choices.

Party Chairman, Oliver Strasse

The question remains whether the proposed 'reform' will have any effect on the electoral chances of the party. With Talbott himself in the Presidential Cabinet, any governmental mistakes will paint him with the same brush as the UMP, and Strasse may struggle in his determination to reconcile both moderate and more radical conservatives, especially when the former showed out in full support of the UMP during the last election.
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
This Month in the General Assembly

"Value for money!" will no doubt be the party slogan of the CUE next election. Despite complete collapse in the polls last time around, and only one MGA in the legislature, the leader of the party, Per Oliver Strasse, has quickly become the political trend setter and veritable ideas factory of Term XI. His first work, amending the flimsy PDRA put forward by a drug-fuelled pot-junky last term, although drawing criticism from the more radical conservative groups, has put paid to allegations that the CUE is only for reactionary, backwards looking gimicks. Indeed, with the pragmatism of a true Conservative, Per Strasse looks to be succeeding in moderating the dangerous mandate earned by the UMP from the election.

Indeed, the Independent would like to applaud Per Strasse on the FSSA, the bill he launched creating the Food Standards Agency, a regulatory body designed to combat the problems of substandard and dangerous foodstuffs. Although its governing principles may not be the stuff of glitz and razmataz, it fits in well with the technocratic rule of President de Fourgéres. And although the Independent is certainly not in favour of the political apathy that will no doubt be created by the sickening boring competence of the current President, we certainly appreciate sensible measures like the FSSA.

This moves us on to the two most recent bills put forward - the Energy Efficiency Programme, a piece of ill-thought-out legislation, little more than an environmental gimick that will have little or not effect on the issues that matter, and the Airport Casino Privitisation Bill. Proposed by Major Thomas J. McGrath and Per Strasse respectively, they will no doubt receive increased press coverage in the coming weeks.

President Issues Plea for Psychedelic Tourism​

In a surprising move from a man who in the breath before had held out a warm hand to the concerns of the conservative Soldiers of God, President de Fourgéres issued a decree that he would welcome with open arms all those hard-drug users who wished to come to Eutopia and receive treatment. How exactly can a man understand the legitimate worries of an organisation like the Soldiers of God when he offers such shocking support to drug-abusers, virtually encouraging them to flood into Eutopia in a never-ending tide. The Independent understands that he just wishes them to be treated here, but doesn't he understand that such a flow of miscreants, desperate to find money to fuel their habits, will have an extremely negative effect on the crime figures in our country? The President seems happy to relieve the burden on other nations at the expense of our own citizens' protection and safety.
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
'Cash Cows and'Casinos

There's been a lot of rubbish in the media recently. In particular, rubbish filling the sentences and paragraphs of Josephus Locke Sergei's editorial in The Eutopian Worker. The Independent hardly expects anything of worth to come out of the mouths of socialists and extremists, but this piece of comment is hardly worth the shoddy paper it is written on.

I introduced the bill privatising the Airport Casinos because not only does it make moral sense, but because it makes economic sense also. But I also introduced a bill ensuring that the gambling industry - not just these 'lounges' - will be properly regulated in the future. These two pieces of legislation represent the duality of Conservatism in the CUE - the idea that the Government must not stray into areas of life that are not its preserve, but also the idea that the Government has a responsibility to protect its citizens.

I see no reason why any state should have its own gambling industry. What benefit does gambling do to the people? What moral right does the state have to run its own casinos. The answer is quite clearly none. For as long as the state runs its own operations - most likely without the vigour and verve of a private individual - it will not only be preventing that operation from fulfilling its own potential, but also will be insulting all those people who disagree vehemently with gambling and would much rather that the state took no part at all in running it. If there is to be a limited gaming industry in Eutopia, it should not be run by the state, but it should be properly regulated - hence the Gambling Board legislation.

There is a deep sense of hypocrisy in Locke Sergei's editorial. On the one hand he emphatically states that the ESA thinks gambling is harmful to society - 'preying on the poor'. And yet on the other hand he quite proudly reminds us that he was a member of the committee that set up the gambling lounges in the first place. What is his position? Is gambling alright as long as he personally had a hand in its inception? Forgive me if I'm wrong, but Locke Sergei cannot be everywhere at once and cannot be trusted to make the right decisions for Eutopian's citizens all the time. These decisions - including the decision whether to own a stake in a gambling house or not - belong to the people themselves. And we must trust them to be responsible at the same time as protecting them against vultures.

The Privatisation of the Airport Casinos was my idea, and once it has been passed I will fight tooth and nail with the socialists and radicals in the ESA to keep them privatised.

Oliver Strasse
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
Why We Should Act Now on New Bengal

When I last tried to raise the matter of New Bengal in the General Assembly, a flame-war started. I was accused of clogging up the GA with useless legislation. I was accused of holding the UMP majority in that assembly hostage. Indeed, I was even treated as a second-class MGA, with little or no right to address the assembly, let alone propose new ideas for its consideration. And so I was forced to shut up - gagged because other members wanted to discuss legislation that will have little or no effect on the true realities of peoples' lives.

But while others will want to brush New Bengal under the carpet (indeed our own President described the feeling on the island as being a 'minority' opinion), I believe that it is high time that Eutopia did something about encouraging people who want to return to the fold to do so. The reason; we can't afford to not act.

If we ignore this one chance to bring my dream, our dream of reunification that little bit closer, what message will we be giving to those other people in St. Espirit and Tilapia who want rejoin Eutopia? They may be in the minority at present, but what if that is only because we are not making the right noises, and putting the right pressure on the other two nations to get their opinions heard? What if our ambivalent attitude towards reunification is turning people away from the dream?

It is high time that we make an example of New Bengal. It is an island that wants to come back to Eutopia. We have a moral duty to encourage it to do so. The Cabinet must act immediately to put pressure on Tilapia to trigger a referendum on the future of New Bengal. There is only so much the CUE can do in the GA - wading through the mush of environmental legislation. The executive must act now. It can't afford not to.

Oliver Strasse, Leader of the CUE
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
The Rot at the Centre of the ESA

Most people will have noticed that recently the ESA member of the General Assembly, Per Olson, has introduced a piece of legislation proposing the legalisation of cannabis as a drug. I'm sure it is well known to my readers that the Socialist party is hardly sensible in the majority of its policies, but this piece of outrageous clap-trap is the most dangerous of its ideas in recent years.

I do not wish to bore people with a long justification about why legalisation of cannabis is wrong, therefore I shall only reproduce the part of the speech that I made in the General Assembly detailing the reasons for my opposition.

1. Cannabis is a dangerous substance in itself. It can disrupt the control of blood pressure, increasing the risk of fainting and even occasional use is bad for people with heart and circulation disorders, and for those predisposed to schizophrenia. Why exactly do we want to to flood the streets with legalised substances that can aid so dramatically mental health, and physical health problems?

2. Cannabis is a gateway drug. There is much research that suggests that if someone gets addicted to it, they will be considerably more likely to move onto harder, and far more damaging drugs. I am not for one moment suggesting that cannabis is as bad as heroin or amphetamines, but it is a slippery slope to walk down if we give people the legal opening to ruin their lives with harder substances.

3. Cannabis causes profound social problems. Some people may find it acceptable that people are able to do exactly what they want. But the state has a responsibility to protect the weakest and most vulnerable people in society. It will not be the rich and the prosperous who will be ruined by having to sustain an addiction to cannabis. It will be the poor and the despairing. They will not be able to find the funds to pay for all the cannabis we have allowed them to be addicted to. There is a considerable danger that they will be driven to crime to fund their habit. We have a responsibility to the poorest members of society to protect them. Indeed I am surprised that the Socialist Per Olson does not wish to help the poor.

4. A legalisation of one drug only causes confusion. If we send a message to people that it is acceptable to use cannabis - a drug - we are issuing a mixed and confused message to people about the justification for using other drugs. "If Cannabis is alright, why isn't Ecstacy?" We will be asked. The state must be clear in its beliefs. Drugs are wrong and should be outlawed. Let us not confuse people without justification.

Just as the Socialist papers announced that they would launch a grass roots campaign to reverse gambling lounge privatisation, I will personally launch a grass roots campaign to reverse cannabis legalisation if it is passed. I will not allow the people of Eutopia to be harmed because of the extreme-libertarianism of the Socialist Party and apparently a large proportion of the Moderates.

A Word to the President

Recently President de Fourgeres spoke to a press conference, attacking me and my stance on reunification on a largely personal basis. I do not wish to play tit-for-tat games with him, but do want to clear up one particular thing. He suggested that the CUE legislative programme was inspired by his own speeches for the election campaign. I can only say to him that this is incorrect. I never bothered to read his turgid attempts at oratory (like a rather large number of other people, no doubt). So don't throw that ball at me, Loic. I won't get muddy.

Oliver Strasse - Leader of the CUE
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
The Americans Hate Us - Can You Really Blame Them?

The Blowerd Act is a disaster for Eutopia. It not only prevents our businesses, our hardworking employers, from trading their goods with the American people, allowing our own population to prosper with its access to the truly global American market, but it also fatally condemns our military - that glorious defender of the Eutopian peoples' liberties and traditions - from re-equipping and purchasing the vehicles that would allow it to better perform its function. In short, if this act is not vetoed by the President, our nation will be reduced to the status of an economic basket-case with a military barely able to keep control of its peoples' own urges let alone defend our borders against enemy incursions.

But the response given by the ruling UMP party - that apparent haunt of pragmatists and powerhouse of independent thought - has been pathetic to say the least! What has the President done? He has asked the Eutopian people to ring America en-masse, no doubt reversing the charges, and beg them to call up their President! I had thought that our President had a rather firmer grasp of world diplomacy than to think that such a little stunt would do much in his favour. How professional will the President consider our Ministry for Foreign Affairs when it conducts its business through the telephoned masses?

The real problem, however, is far, far deeper than just international relations. The problem does not lie with the Americans, the problem lies with us! For too long, the fact that we require a major transformation of our economy from a social democratic, staggering monolith into a truly liberal, vibrant and dynamic powerhouse has been ignored. President de Fourgeres was greeted with so much expectation on my part. But what has he done in regards to the economy? Nothing. A bit of tweaking here and there leaves his vast majority in the General Assembly wasted. The only true act of liberalisation in our economy was undertaken by myself - in the form of the privatisation of the Airport Casinos. Indeed, while our economy has continued to stagnate and labour under the burdens of the Socialist Governments of the past, the Americans have become less and less attracted to the Eutopian peoples' true dynamic and competitive spirit.

Of course secondly, there is also the matter of the late Per Truman and nuclear material debacle. It is shameful that the President did not notice Truman's actions sooner and put a stop to this wayward Minister's little dealings. At the beginning of his term, de Fourgeres announced that he wished to keep his ministers active. He seems to have resoundingly failed in this matter. But it is beyond belief that he would not have sufficient information of his Minister's actions to ensure that such underhand dealings as went on between Truman and whoever he was dealing with didn't happen! Either we have a lying, deceitful President who knew exactly what was going on, or we have an incompetent President, too busy hobknobbing with the great and the good, thinking that was the best way to mend relations with the US, to see what was going on beneath his very nose!

But finally we come to the problem that has plagued Presidential Eutopia since our monarchy was illegitimately wrenched from us. Stability and order. It is true that our island, our people, were able to stick together for centuries as a unified state under the monarchy and a negligible number of years after the dissolution we are divided once more. It is true again that a great many people in our country find it difficult to unite under our current Head of State - a pragmatic politician, without principles. What Eutopia truly needs above all is that unity of spirit that served us so well for the Royal centuries. That unity that kept us together and strengthened our will to succeed. Only by re-instating the constitutional monarchy, with the traditions and fairness that it stands for, can democracy truly be affirmed in Eutopia.
 

unmerged(26817)

Corporal
Mar 15, 2004
28
0
Only Number Two John?

I used to be a devoted viewer of Eutopia Tonight! with John O'Floinn. Who wouldn't enjoy John's handsome face on his television screen every evening, waxing lyrical about politics and whatever else comes to his mind? Indeed, as a devoted viewer I used to think John O'Floinn an amusing, non-partisan alternative to perusing the good-old Uxbridge Chronicle or The Independent itself. But lately, I have been disappointed. For instead of seeing the sweet refreshing John O'Floinn of the past, I have been bombarded by the raucous, sly John O'Floinn, defecating in the corner while he preaches his arrogant little messages.

On the first part, O'Floinn condemns the 'right and the left', describing himself as a 'centrist'. I see no problem with pragmatism - indeed often looking at a problem with an open mind can elicit the best answer. However John has made the mistake of making pragmatism and the centrist message an ideology. He goes on about conservatives and socialists having an ideology, but does exactly the same himself. The only difference is that while my ideology as a conservative requires me to act on my principles and to ensure that I don't betray them, O'Floinn's ideology celebrates at the altar of being principle-less. He revels in the fact that he will do what he likes, whenever he can, when in fact that is a baseless and amoral existence. People must have principles, and these must guide our decisions - not simply the whim of the time.

And on the second part, O'Floinn declares that the CUE hasn't done anything this term. Quite the contrary, actually. Shall we look at the legislative successes of the CUE compared with the UMP and then take a look at how many MGAs we have in comparison with the UMP? The CUE amended one dangerous bill introduced by the UMP, the Psychedelic Drug Reform Act (PDRA), changing it from a bill that allowed the unrestricted access of these drugs to doctors into a properly regulated way of ensuring medical advances are laid open to the Eutopian people. The CUE also introduced and passed three further bills, the FSSA, the PACB, and the CCBA. With only one member in the GA (and counting the reworking of the PDRA as 1/2), that gives the CUE 3.5 bills/MGA. On the other hand, the UMP has passed only two pieces of legislation, the FIPRA and the OERA. I'll add the half from the PDRA and how many bills per MGA is that? 0.35 bills/MGA. How dare O'Floinn say the CUE has achieved nothing when he has this record to look at!

Now the most disgusting piece of trumpet-blowing I have ever seen on television. O'Floinn decided that he would rank the hardest working politicians as he saw it. Any modest man, any man with any principles would have left himself out of such a ranking. I would have. I rather that other people see the benefits of my actions for themselves rather than be forced to artificially inflate myself with little lists. But there he is. Second behind de Fourgeres. Undeservedly, I believe.

As you may have gleaned from this little article, I am no longer a devoted viewer of Eutopia Tonight! If I wanted to have UMP propaganda stuffed down my throat I would visit the Presidential Press Briefing Room.

God Bless.