So, I thought I had a screenshot for this, but it turned out that Steam didn't take it, and I don't want to spend twenty minutes starting the game and getting to the same place as I was again.
Essentially, I was testing an idea that I saw here - namely, vassalising the Mughals if they've formed, then selling the remainder of India to them, which they have claims on.
For me, this didn't work. If you have an inland province, you can't sell it to a vassal that has a claim on it without the ability to core it yourself - ie, regardless of whether or not your vassal has a claim on it, you still won't be able to sell it.
I don't really think this is necessary. With the recent limitations introduced in 1.5 to vassal feeding, you're lucky if you have a vassal that fabricates claims. Vassals also no longer give you coring/colonisation range - and whilst I personally think this is bullsh*t, because it biases colonisation towards larger, already easy nations, I recognise that it is a legitimate way of stopping nations from exploiting a no CB war against a native to colonise North America far before everyone else.
I don't see why it would be necessary to core a province your vassal has a claim on, though. Surely it's just a matter of 'Oh, you want this? Well, I can't core it, you might as well have it'.
Thoughts?
Essentially, I was testing an idea that I saw here - namely, vassalising the Mughals if they've formed, then selling the remainder of India to them, which they have claims on.
For me, this didn't work. If you have an inland province, you can't sell it to a vassal that has a claim on it without the ability to core it yourself - ie, regardless of whether or not your vassal has a claim on it, you still won't be able to sell it.
I don't really think this is necessary. With the recent limitations introduced in 1.5 to vassal feeding, you're lucky if you have a vassal that fabricates claims. Vassals also no longer give you coring/colonisation range - and whilst I personally think this is bullsh*t, because it biases colonisation towards larger, already easy nations, I recognise that it is a legitimate way of stopping nations from exploiting a no CB war against a native to colonise North America far before everyone else.
I don't see why it would be necessary to core a province your vassal has a claim on, though. Surely it's just a matter of 'Oh, you want this? Well, I can't core it, you might as well have it'.
Thoughts?