Originally posted by tuna
Awesome, Germany and Sweden trading...I wonder how convoys will exactly factor into this---or whether a landlocked nation (say Hungary) can import goods from Britain?
Originally posted by Meiji-Tenno
I agree. Very nice trade system. I am very excited about this game!![]()
Originally posted by zsolo
However, as an economsit I still cannot understand how the role of money could be left out from the scope of such a great game. I hope that noboby at Paradox thniks that the year of 1929-33 barter trade ruled the world.
I kindly remind everyone how the gold stock of the UK melt becuase of the lend lease in 1939-42. IMHO it is the best example for my concenerns. A nation in the midst of a world war cannot afford to spend any valuable resources in exchange of others.
But a much greater problem appears to me what will countries do which do not have any resources at all. What will be their offer look like...?
I have to say as an opinion no one lost the war for want of money. So during the war itself money was not important as such.
Originally posted by TMO
The brits actually had a money problem, but then they got lend/lease.
But war economy is one thing, what about pre war conditions. As a neutral minor is it impossible to buy equipment?
Originally posted by jacob-Lundgren
ok here it comes
country a has few resources but a little extra coal and badly needs oil. country b only needs coal but doesnt have extra oil.
country c has both but little steel.
now country a trades coal to b for gold and trades that gold to c for oil who uses that gold for steel and uk uses that gold to buy 5 destroyers. works for me
![]()
Originally posted by jacob-Lundgren
ok i only put 5 seconds of thought into it i coulndt make it perfect![]()
but you see how gold can be useful?