Saturdays 1520 long term 2

[admiral drake]

i suggest that we only post aar:s in the aar thread, someone objects?

should be able to post coments but i won't object.........

 

[King John]

Guys, I suggest we stop signing non-aggression pacts. At the rate we're going, soon their will be no more wars, which though a noble goal in real life is NOT GOOD FOR EU2! Players could break NAPs i suppose, but nobody wants to be looked at as dishonorable scum, so if people want to make diplomacy a little more interesting i think we need to outlaw NAPs from now on, and make all previously signed ones null and void.

 

[Specterx]

Guys, I suggest we stop signing non-aggression pacts. At the rate we're going, soon their will be no more wars, which though a noble goal in real life is NOT GOOD FOR EU2! Players could break NAPs i suppose, but nobody wants to be looked at as dishonorable scum, so if people want to make diplomacy a little more interesting i think we need to outlaw NAPs from now on, and make all previously signed ones null and void.

If you want to do this go ahead. I'd prefer to stay alive.

 

[unmerged(11216)]

If you want to do this go ahead. I'd prefer to stay alive.

:rofl:

 

[admiral drake]

If you want to do this go ahead. I'd prefer to stay alive.

good 1 specterx :rofl: :rofl:

 

[admiral drake]

Guys, I suggest we stop signing non-aggression pacts. At the rate we're going, soon their will be no more wars, which though a noble goal in real life is NOT GOOD FOR EU2! Players could break NAPs i suppose, but nobody wants to be looked at as dishonorable scum, so if people want to make diplomacy a little more interesting i think we need to outlaw NAPs from now on, and make all previously signed ones null and void.

request a rule against dowing if you go against naps to

 

[admiral drake]

we should hold a landrace next session ,

madrid-vienna- constantinople-moscow-berlin-paris(end)

everybody get 3-5k to madrid

 

[unmerged(11216)]

we should hold a landrace next session ,

madrid-vienna- constantinople-moscow-berlin-paris(end)

everybody get 3-5k to madrid

Lol me and france's little around-the-world contest had more influence on you guys then we thought

Edit: In IE2 that is

 

[admiral drake]

Guys, I suggest we stop signing non-aggression pacts. At the rate we're going, soon their will be no more wars, which though a noble goal in real life is NOT GOOD FOR EU2! Players could break NAPs i suppose, but nobody wants to be looked at as dishonorable scum, so if people want to make diplomacy a little more interesting i think we need to outlaw NAPs from now on, and make all previously signed ones null and void.

the 1 signing nap ussually like a good time of peace(knowing brand and denmark aint 1 of those)

 

[admiral drake]

Lol me and france's little around-the-world contest had more influence on you guys then we thought

Edit: In IE2 that is

that was a fun session
besides its a good alternative to war for a short period (knowing denmark and brand wil disagree)

 

[Fredrik82]

Guys, I suggest we stop signing non-aggression pacts. At the rate we're going, soon their will be no more wars, which though a noble goal in real life is NOT GOOD FOR EU2! Players could break NAPs i suppose, but nobody wants to be looked at as dishonorable scum, so if people want to make diplomacy a little more interesting i think we need to outlaw NAPs from now on, and make all previously signed ones null and void.

Temporary NAP for like for 10 years should be allowed. But a NAP through out the game sucks, like Russia-OE. Its not good for the Game, and makes the game less fun. period!

 

[King John]

If you want to do this go ahead. I'd prefer to stay alive.

Why wouldn't you? Hehehe. Russia isn't going to attack Poland regardless of having a NAP or not, though if it did you certainly would be able to get a defensive alliance with either Austria, the OE or Sweden. That would be interesting wouldn't it? And then Poland might be able to regain some of its cores in the east and reestablish itself as a strong eastern power(not under the shadow of the Russian bear). As for the OE, they wouldn't attack Poland because they have no reason to. You don't have any lands of worth to them, and Austria of course is tired of getting hammered as a result of wasting its troops in Poland. This wouldn't be of any disadvantage to you, but maybe would actually help Poland.

On the other hand, maybe I read that wrong. This would help you to stay alive, and that could be what you meant as far as i know . sorry if i've misinterpreted

 

[unmerged(11216)]

Temporary NAP for like for 10 years should be allowed. But a NAP through out the game sucks, like Russia-OE. Its not good for the Game, and makes the game less fun. period!

Now im really pissed. You havent done anything else since start but to complain about the peacefull relations between OE and Russia and that is of one reason; You are getting beaten. The reason im so angry is that you are all the time trying to make it sound like you're the victim! It is YOU who is the aggressors, it is YOU who force us into these alliances! So stop talking bullshit

 

[King John]

we should hold a landrace next session ,

madrid-vienna- constantinople-moscow-berlin-paris(end)

everybody get 3-5k to madrid

you can do whatever you want of course. if you have some good generals, feel free to send them. Denmark does not object!!!

 

[admiral drake]

Temporary NAP for like for 10 years should be allowed. But a NAP through out the game sucks, like Russia-OE. Its not good for the Game, and makes the game less fun. period!

a neutral russia isn't as bad as a brand allyng austria

 

[admiral drake]

you can do whatever you want of course. if you have some good generals, feel free to send them. Denmark does not object!!!

lol

 

[King John]

Now im really pissed. You havent done anything else since start but to complain about the peacefull relations between OE and Russia and that is of one reason; You are getting beaten. The reason im so angry is that you are all the time trying to make it sound like you're the victim! It is YOU who is the aggressors, it is YOU who force us into these alliances! So stop talking bullshit

I would like to point out that it was YOU that attacked Austria in the first place, not the other way around.

 

[unmerged(11216)]

I would like to point out that it was YOU that attacked Austria in the first place, not the other way around.

Yes, the early two wars which was 1v1 between me and austria(note austria got spanish money), anything else?

 

[Fredrik82]

Now im really pissed. You havent done anything else since start but to complain about the peacefull relations between OE and Russia and that is of one reason; You are getting beaten. The reason im so angry is that you are all the time trying to make it sound like you're the victim! It is YOU who is the aggressors, it is YOU who force us into these alliances! So stop talking bullshit

ehhh?
we was talking about this NAP thing, If you don't se a problem with having a perm NAP between two giant nation in game, fine. But that is a problem, not just against me, for the game! And besides its like me and France would agree on a perm border and a perm NAP. A dead game no doubt.
And a game without a conflict in the east is almost a dead game also!

i'm not whinnig, i'm just concerned about the game.

 

[arcorelli]

ehhh?
we was talking about this NAP thing, If you don't se a problem with having a perm NAP between two giant nation in game, fine. But that is a problem, not just against me, for the game! And besides its like me and France would agree on a perm border and a perm NAP.

We can't? Damn it