Same naval attachments - different stats?

[unmerged(42723)]

Please look at the pic:



Both ships are BB I and got exactly the same attachments - shouldn't they have now exactly the same stats as well? The only diff is that the attachments weren't added in the same order, but I didn't think that would play any role....

 

[Draigh]

Perhaps one of the attachments is an older model?

 

[unmerged(42723)]

They were all from the same serial build, same model (for both).

 

[GAGA Extrem]

Strange that the attachments are inversed on the two ships...
...maybe only 1 of them effects the ship (bug?!)...

 

[unmerged(42723)]

Well, that they are immersed is probably just how I added them (didn#t pay attention) just the different stats confuse me.

I checked the ships iin the savegame, and it appears except the order nothing is different that would explain the different stats:

division = {
id = { type = 10848 id = 1204 }
name = "Marat"
model = 0
brigade_model = 0
type = battleship
extra = naval_fire_controll_l
extra = naval_anti_air_l
strength = 100.0000
organisation = 48.0000
morale = 40.0000
experience = 0.0000
defaultorganisation = 50.0000
redep_unit_name = ""
maxspeed = 15.0000
supplyconsumption = 0.8000
fuelconsumption = 1.0000
surfacedetectioncapability = 1.0000
airdetectioncapability = 1.0000
subdetectioncapability = 1.0000
visibility = 90.0000
seadefence = 12.0000
airdefence = 1.0000
seaattack = 15.0000
subattack = 0.0000
convoyattack = 14.0000
shorebombardment = 7.0000
airattack = 1.0000
transportcapability = 0.0000
range = 2500.0000
distance = 0.3700
travelled = 0.0000
}
division = {
id = { type = 10848 id = 1205 }
name = "Oktyabrskaya Revoluciya"
model = 0
brigade_model = 0
type = battleship
extra = naval_anti_air_l
extra = naval_fire_controll_l
strength = 100.0000
organisation = 48.0000
morale = 40.0000
experience = 0.0000
defaultorganisation = 50.0000
redep_unit_name = ""
maxspeed = 15.0000
supplyconsumption = 0.8000
fuelconsumption = 1.0000
surfacedetectioncapability = 1.0000
airdetectioncapability = 2.0000
subdetectioncapability = 1.0000
visibility = 90.0000
seadefence = 12.0000
airdefence = 2.0000
seaattack = 14.0000
subattack = 0.0000
convoyattack = 14.0000
shorebombardment = 6.0000
airattack = 2.0000
transportcapability = 0.0000
range = 2500.0000
distance = 0.3200
travelled = 0.0000
}

 

[GAGA Extrem]

How about trying to remove i attachment from the save file and check stats afterwards...

...still looks like 1 of your attachemnts doesen't count :wacko:

 

[unmerged(42723)]

Yeah, good idea, I'll try a bit around.....

 

[GAGA Extrem]

Just noticed a post in the bug thread that you can only add 1 brigade via Unit menu, for the rest you have to use the B+ button.

Maybe adding them in a certain way messes up the bonus effects...

 

[hito1]

Some people are reporting that only the first attachment to capital ships produce effects, the others add nothing.

 

[unmerged(42723)]

I think this is - unfortunately - correct. I did add both attachments here with B+ btw....

 

[Van der Gent]

I added 2 brigades to my Italian BB IV, at first they had their attack increased. But after some time (a month, two or three) they lost their effect.

 

[unmerged(50895)]

I added 2 brigades to my Italian BB IV, at first they had their attack increased. But after some time (a month, two or three) they lost their effect.

Bah This needs fixing badly!

 

[unmerged(64536)]

Looks to me that for Capital ships the first attachment you use is the only one that has an effect.

 

[unmerged(59071)]

dude u got fc1 and aa2 on the one and fc2 and aa1 on the other

 

[unmerged(42723)]

As said, those are from the same serial builds (one for AA and another for cap fire control brigades). Unless Armageddon changes the type in a running series once a new model becomes available (which I doubt it was at that time) these are the same types of brigades.

 

[Boudiboudi]

Some people are reporting that only the first attachment to capital ships produce effects, the others add nothing.

If it's true, Shame on Paradox !!!

They don't giving armageddon, we pay for it, and they didn't betatested it seriously !!! :wacko:

I can't understand it, the mistake is too enormous...

 

[Boudiboudi]

Erf !! I understand !

It's a 1st april joke !! :rofl:

 

[unmerged(38672)]

Not likely since it was reported on the 30th of March. A bad one too if it would be the case...