Royalistic Party of Eutopia (RPE)

[Gathenhielm]

Originally posted by I_Killed-Kenny
That consist in the first mouth of the year, January ( just in case you didn't know ) The retired don't resieve great pesions so they should resieve double pensions in January so they can live better.

Vasco, executive secretary of the ECL

Isnt January the first month of the year?

 

[unmerged(8022)]

Originally posted by I_Killed-Kenny
Very very LOL TOTATLLY LOL

(ooc: please cut the spam off here, If it isn't any importent pm me if you will post in our HQ and are not a member)

 

[Gathenhielm]

Great with the advartisement in the news.

Hope we can get new members until friday.

 

[Xipe]

Originally posted by J. Banér
Offcourse we want a capitalistic economy, but the state should buy and run a lot of companys to earn money, so we don't need to raise the taxes or even can lower them.
"Money makes the worlds goes round" we most discuss the economy.

Damn you! I spilled my coffee all over the desk from laughing so hard!

Fun stuff, that...

 

[Gathenhielm]

Re: Re: Royalistic Party of Eutopia (RPE)

Originally posted by Xipe
Damn you! I spilled my coffee all over the desk from laughing so hard!

Fun stuff, that...

Well as he said it is discussable.

Banér maybe change it to own not run.

 

[unmerged(4007)]

On behalf of Mr Lundgren I would like to thank you for your support for our paty's nominee for the Presidency. I hope this points to the continued cooperation of our two parties.

Most Sincerely,
Sean Galloglaigh
FR Chair

 

[unmerged(8022)]

Gatenhielm,
I agree with you that the state should own company not necessary run them.

What do you think about to join the European Union? I think that Eutopia manage it good on our own hand and not need such a big union and also that no other country (or union) should be able to decide what Eutopia should do. I other words we don't need it it only will cost us more money then we get.

 

[hughbartlett]

Note from PI journalist

Just a quick question for a future article to appear in the 'Peoples' Interest' Magazine: What is the RPE's view on the new CMJ (Centralistic Monarchistic Party for Justice)? Will you work with them, or againts them?

 

[Gathenhielm]

Originally posted by J. Banér

What do you think about to join the European Union? I think that Eutopia manage it good on our own hand and not need such a big union and also that no other country (or union) should be able to decide what Eutopia should do. I other words we don't need it it only will cost us more money then we get.

Agree. We can cooperate with EU like Norway.

 

[Gathenhielm]

Re: Note from PI journalist

Originally posted by hughbartlett
Just a quick question for a future article to appear in the 'Peoples' Interest' Magazine: What is the RPE's view on the new CMJ (Centralistic Monarchistic Party for Justice)? Will you work with them, or againts them?

Well they support a king/queen. That is good. But I cant say I like their way to rule the country. But in many other issues I can agree with them.

 

[unmerged(5730)]

My friends. It seems like we have common goals in our ideas to get a King on the throne and in the question about crimes where we both think that criminals should be punished greatly for their acts. Although I believe that that is the only questions where we are totally on the same line.

Therefore I suggest that we co-operate in these questions and especially tries to get a King on the Throne.

I know that we are a newly founded party and that we yet don't have enough members to fully be counted as a Party, but I would be pleased if you thought about a co-operation in the future. Thank you.

 

[Gathenhielm]

Originally posted by Kent I Wallmi
My friends. It seems like we have common goals in our ideas to get a King on the throne and in the question about crimes where we both think that criminals should be punished greatly for their acts. Although I believe that that is the only questions where we are totally on the same line.

Therefore I suggest that we co-operate in these questions and especially tries to get a King on the Throne.

I know that we are a newly founded party and that we yet don't have enough members to fully be counted as a Party, but I would be pleased if you thought about a co-operation in the future. Thank you.

Not immigration then?

Yeah that should be great.

Well we arent registrated either, but if we be that I would be happy to work together to place a king on the throne.

 

[unmerged(5730)]

Originally posted by Gathenhielm
Not immigration then?

Yeah that should be great.

Well we arent registrated either, but if we be that I would be happy to work together to place a king on the throne.

Yes, the immigration too, forgot that one

So, then I can look forward to a co-operation, great.

 

[unmerged(8022)]

I think that our two partys have almost exact the same lines in almost everything, what do you think Gatenhielm and Kent?

 

[unmerged(5730)]

Originally posted by J. Banér
I think that our two partys have almost exact the same lines in almost everything, what do you think Gatenhielm and Kent?

Well, at first I thought about entering your party, but in the military issue we have totally different oppinions, so also in the economical issue where you are for lower taxes.

Anyway, if none of us manage to reach the limit for being at the next elections, we can discuss a merge of the parties, atleast a temporar one. What about that?

 

[Gathenhielm]

Originally posted by Kent I Wallmi

Anyway, if none of us manage to reach the limit for being at the next elections, we can discuss a merge of the parties, atleast a temporar one. What about that?

Agree. But that is to discuss then.

 

[unmerged(5730)]

Originally posted by Gathenhielm
Agree. But that is to discuss then.

Exactly what I ment

 

[unmerged(8022)]

Originally posted by Kent I Wallmi
Well, at first I thought about entering your party, but in the military issue we have totally different oppinions, so also in the economical issue where you are for lower taxes.

Anyway, if none of us manage to reach the limit for being at the next elections, we can discuss a merge of the parties, atleast a temporar one. What about that?

Well my idea about lover taxes is when we can afford it but first the economy must be good, and we think it can be good if the state own a lot of companies and industries to earn money.

So the big differences between our partys is the military...

 

[Gathenhielm]

So if we can overcome this two issues maybe we can emerge?

An emerging would give us five members and registrated as a party.

 

[unmerged(5730)]

Originally posted by Gathenhielm
So if we can overcome this two issues maybe we can emerge?

An emerging would give us five members and registrated as a party.

Well, that wouldn't be impossible I believe. Nothing else in my program that you find that you not agree with?