-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
So I can check JM or Panzer. Thoughts? I'm at work for a bit longer, will talk more later.
I'm fine with that. It'll prove that I am Resistance and that Happycats is the most likely spy or Falc will lie and he will be a spy.
I just created that spreadsheet of mine (without the mathematics).
Just noticed we totally let of Tamius out of everything, no cards, not on a single proposal.
Also Jerman seems to have voted the last two times by PM without at least telling he is going to do so in the thread.
I am missing Jacksonians reasons for giving out the cards the way he did. Falc and aedan are both players who were on a sabotaged mission.
Just noticed we totally let of Tamius out of everything, no cards, not on a single proposal.
Also Jerman seems to have voted the last two times by PM without at least telling he is going to do so in the thread.
I am missing Jacksonians reasons for giving out the cards the way he did. Falc and aedan are both players who were on a sabotaged mission.
We were also both players who were on a passed mission. Happycats is the most likely spy from mission 2, though I'm not set on that. Jacksonian is very likely to be a resistance member, unless both he and Falc are spies. Which is possible I guess. Though giving me a card makes sense either way. Sure I might be biased, knowing I'm a resistance member, but I'm also well known for sabotaging teams I'm on, so I would have sabotaged mission 1 if I was a spy. I didn't obviously, so I'm a very unlikely spy.
Pretty much what Aedan said, except I think Aedan is more likely resistance due to the non-sabotage on mission 1. I honestly don't think Falc saying I'm resistance necessarily clears him either, but I think it's much more likely he's resistance now for telling the truth. Ergo, I think Happycats is a spy.
So my thoughts on the other team members:
Jackson - I don't think he's a spy. He could have sabotaged Mission 1 and would have had his choice of aedan or Falc to pin the blame on. Also Falc just cleared him, so unless they're both spies he's looking pretty good.
aedan - Apparently he has a reputation of sabotaging any mission he can. Although he is aware of this reputation and can use it to his advantage. He might have supported the first mission with the expectation that people would keep putting him on missions afterwards, since he could use his reputation as a defense from there on out.
Falc - Assuming Jackson is resistance, I'm honestly not sure why Jackson is giving Falc so much credit for saying Jackson is resistance. Spy Falc could have claimed Jackson was a spy and put both of them under suspicion. However, I'd argue that claiming that Jackson is resistance would be the smart move for spy Falc. He's got an easy scapegoat in me since I was a new member of the team and could easily be blamed for the sabotage. By clearing Jackson, Falc would also then avoid drawing suspicion to himself and gain the trust of a resistance member (Jackson). So as far as I can see there's only benefits for spy Falc by claiming Jackson is resistance and I don't see any real benefits to saying Jackson is a spy when I'm already there as a scapegoat. Of course, Falc and Jackson could also be a spy team together, so then he also has reason to say Jackson is resistance.
Jackson - I don't think he's a spy. He could have sabotaged Mission 1 and would have had his choice of aedan or Falc to pin the blame on. Also Falc just cleared him, so unless they're both spies he's looking pretty good.
aedan - Apparently he has a reputation of sabotaging any mission he can. Although he is aware of this reputation and can use it to his advantage. He might have supported the first mission with the expectation that people would keep putting him on missions afterwards, since he could use his reputation as a defense from there on out.
Falc - Assuming Jackson is resistance, I'm honestly not sure why Jackson is giving Falc so much credit for saying Jackson is resistance. Spy Falc could have claimed Jackson was a spy and put both of them under suspicion. However, I'd argue that claiming that Jackson is resistance would be the smart move for spy Falc. He's got an easy scapegoat in me since I was a new member of the team and could easily be blamed for the sabotage. By clearing Jackson, Falc would also then avoid drawing suspicion to himself and gain the trust of a resistance member (Jackson). So as far as I can see there's only benefits for spy Falc by claiming Jackson is resistance and I don't see any real benefits to saying Jackson is a spy when I'm already there as a scapegoat. Of course, Falc and Jackson could also be a spy team together, so then he also has reason to say Jackson is resistance.
@Jacksonian Missionary: Why didn't you go with the highest information approach, and gave Tamius the card to check my allegiance?
Jackson
Aedan
Falc
Panzer Commader
I feel this is a solid team, as seeing I've lost faith in happycats and I believe Jerman to be a spy. I still don't like npster on the team and I think Tamius being off every proposal is points against him. I think this team is the best.
Approve
Aedan
Falc
Panzer Commader
I feel this is a solid team, as seeing I've lost faith in happycats and I believe Jerman to be a spy. I still don't like npster on the team and I think Tamius being off every proposal is points against him. I think this team is the best.
Approve