In my current game, I am sieging the fort of Crimea with the help of Poland, who has attached its troops to my army. I also control the majority of the sieging units, and the siege is lead by me.
I then move my other army into the siege, and I still am leading the siege.
However, upon either merging my units directly, or re-organising them using the window below,
Poland gains control of the siege.
This is only a minor nuisance in my case, as I could crash the game to avoid restarting. However, had this been a different situation, losing control of a siege could be more crucial. Is this intended behaviour, or should I file a bug report?
I then move my other army into the siege, and I still am leading the siege.
However, upon either merging my units directly, or re-organising them using the window below,
Poland gains control of the siege.
This is only a minor nuisance in my case, as I could crash the game to avoid restarting. However, had this been a different situation, losing control of a siege could be more crucial. Is this intended behaviour, or should I file a bug report?
- 2