-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It doesn't. Some users have special status and can add attachments (as long as they don't abuse the privilege).
This is super good stuff. Thanks. You are great.
One note, TheDarkside, the 2 links at the bottom of your signature, are pointing at the same thread, while the first one should be pointing at this thread. You should fix that.
whoops - thanks!
Really? I didn't know that ... so that means I have special status?! I gotta see if this will get me into those coveted VIP sections at Vegas...
Why does Bose in southern China have such a huge amount of leadership?? Is that Fu Manchu's secret stronghold or what?
Is that Fu Manchu's secret stronghold or what?
Why does Bose in southern China have such a huge amount of leadership??
I think it's to give the Guanxi clique a source of leadership that's out of reach of either Nat China or Japan. Gameplay purely the city itself is kind of worthless. It's neither the biggest city in the province nor the capital.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baise,_Guangxi
Wait theres no crude oil in almost all the nations? Do they all survive off trade (I automate mine so I dont really notice) or is it the energy to oil thing that keeps their things moving?
Seems with the oil spread the way it is, if romania doesnt trade with the US, Venezuala, or Arabia, its completely pointless to build a tank?
Though this is not the way it plays out...what am I missing? And how do I change it so without yer own oil, or trades, you wont ever supply an aircraft or ship?
Seems with the oil spread the way it is, if romania doesnt trade with the US, Venezuala, or Arabia, its completely pointless to build a tank?
Though this is not the way it plays out...what am I missing? And how do I change it so without yer own oil, or trades, you wont ever supply an aircraft or ship?
Question for Darkside in reference to each of your resource lists:
Example: v1.3 (unmodded) has 3.0 energy in a province, but your list shows 13.0 energy for the province.
Does the energy on your list REPLACE the current province resource, or does it ADD to the current resource in play?
It makes a big difference how we interpret & then use your deep research in the game!
Thanks for your work, Darkside! It saved me from doing the same thing for some selected provinces.
Joe
Example: v1.3 (unmodded) has 3.0 energy in a province, but your list shows 13.0 energy for the province.
Does the energy on your list REPLACE the current province resource, or does it ADD to the current resource in play?
It makes a big difference how we interpret & then use your deep research in the game!
Thanks for your work, Darkside! It saved me from doing the same thing for some selected provinces.
Joe
Excellent work as always DarkSide.
One quick thing though, if its not too much problem is there any possibility you could make the middle two value sets in your maps a little more distinct from eachother? Not a big deal but when looking at the maps I honestly can't tell one yellow from the other
Cheers keep up the good work.
One quick thing though, if its not too much problem is there any possibility you could make the middle two value sets in your maps a little more distinct from eachother? Not a big deal but when looking at the maps I honestly can't tell one yellow from the other
Cheers keep up the good work.
The data is parsed from the province history files.
IF you find any discrepancies in the data please tell me the province name and I will check it out.
Excellent work as always DarkSide.
One quick thing though, if its not too much problem is there any possibility you could make the middle two value sets in your maps a little more distinct from eachother? Not a big deal but when looking at the maps I honestly can't tell one yellow from the other
Cheers keep up the good work.
Yeah I had trouble trying to decide on colors and I'm not all that happy with it either.
Let me know what you think would be better, more distinguishable colors and I'll see what I can do
Blue, red, yellow and green from highest to lowest? I really don't have much of a preference, doesn't matter when there's a key so I'd say whatever you think is best.
Cheers
I'm going to update them with the new 1.4 beta patch
But I was thinking it would be cool if I could make maps that just show difference from 1.3 to 1.4 - what do you guys think?
What I mean is, a map that highlights only provinces that have the resource changed up or down. Like maybe different shades of red/yellow to show provinces with reduced values while shades of blue/green show resource increased. Would this be helpful? I ask because it will require a little bit of new code to accomplish and if no one is interested I guess I'd just be wasting time
But I was thinking it would be cool if I could make maps that just show difference from 1.3 to 1.4 - what do you guys think?
What I mean is, a map that highlights only provinces that have the resource changed up or down. Like maybe different shades of red/yellow to show provinces with reduced values while shades of blue/green show resource increased. Would this be helpful? I ask because it will require a little bit of new code to accomplish and if no one is interested I guess I'd just be wasting time
All maps and tables have been updated to 1.4 data.
I also changed the color scheme in hopes of making the colors more easily distinguishable - is it better?
Also I added a country ranking table that tallies up the resources per country.
Unfortunately for some tables I had to change full country name to country tag due to size restraints (was passing 50k char limit) because of additional data added. But the country ranking tables will provide easy lookup for those tags
In the coming days I will produce maps/tables to compare what exactly changed from 1.3 to 1.4 but I can tell you right now it's only in leadership and manpower just as they said in the patch notes (no stealth changes)
The total world's manpower went from 1505 spread across 629 provinces to 1544.4 spread across 637 provinces
The total leadership went from 198.7605 spread across 651 provinces to 211.3804 spread across 671 provinces.
I also changed the color scheme in hopes of making the colors more easily distinguishable - is it better?
Also I added a country ranking table that tallies up the resources per country.
Unfortunately for some tables I had to change full country name to country tag due to size restraints (was passing 50k char limit) because of additional data added. But the country ranking tables will provide easy lookup for those tags
In the coming days I will produce maps/tables to compare what exactly changed from 1.3 to 1.4 but I can tell you right now it's only in leadership and manpower just as they said in the patch notes (no stealth changes)
The total world's manpower went from 1505 spread across 629 provinces to 1544.4 spread across 637 provinces
The total leadership went from 198.7605 spread across 651 provinces to 211.3804 spread across 671 provinces.
Thanks, TheDarkside!!!
One question about colours... green makes me misunderstand a bit the graphics. It's fine going from darker to brighter colours, why not replacing green by somewhat of orange?
And it's right that Soviet's manpower have been increased, but... UK? Won't it be refitted? The British India problem again.
Thanks again for your work!
One question about colours... green makes me misunderstand a bit the graphics. It's fine going from darker to brighter colours, why not replacing green by somewhat of orange?
And it's right that Soviet's manpower have been increased, but... UK? Won't it be refitted? The British India problem again.
Thanks again for your work!
Yeah I am struggling to find the right colors. Let me know what combination might work better and I will try it.
thanks