Are you intending to democratize in the future when the Japanese are finally the dominant powers in the Pacific?
Japanese democratizing on their own, in a victorious position? Not bloody likely.
Are you intending to democratize in the future when the Japanese are finally the dominant powers in the Pacific?
Are you intending to democratize in the future when the Japanese are finally the dominant powers in the Pacific?
I can hardly see them going democratic immediately. I would expect a sort of collapse ala Soviet Union somewhere down the road, if it comes at all.
So long as prosperity is maintained, the Empire can take away all the rights they want. The people will accept it as a trade off.
A 'chaotic and floundering' democratic society or the 'ordered and prosperous' set up of a semi-benevolent Empire is, for the Japanese at least, a cut and dry answer. It's only when the prosperity subsides that they will begin to question their leaders. As for the colonies, if they are prosperous and and a healthy relationship based on respect for local customs, language and culture is maintained then the people will be far more willing to let go of home rule. There will obviously be dissenters everywhere, but they would be far more manageable in this manner.
A strictly Japanese dominated Empire that imposes their language and culture on their colonies - unless they bring a great deal of prosperity - will cause a good deal of discontent with the Empire and likely breed numerous separatist factions. The following independence wars and atrocities committed by both sides would only fuel hatred and even if successful, the Japanese Empire will have only bought time before another revolt began.
I can hardly see them going democratic immediately. I would expect a sort of collapse ala Soviet Union somewhere down the road, if it comes at all.
So long as prosperity is maintained, the Empire can take away all the rights they want. The people will accept it as a trade off.
A 'chaotic and floundering' democratic society or the 'ordered and prosperous' set up of a semi-benevolent Empire is, for the Japanese at least, a cut and dry answer. It's only when the prosperity subsides that they will begin to question their leaders. As for the colonies, if they are prosperous and and a healthy relationship based on respect for local customs, language and culture is maintained then the people will be far more willing to let go of home rule. There will obviously be dissenters everywhere, but they would be far more manageable in this manner.
A strictly Japanese dominated Empire that imposes their language and culture on their colonies - unless they bring a great deal of prosperity - will cause a good deal of discontent with the Empire and likely breed numerous separatist factions. The following independence wars and atrocities committed by both sides would only fuel hatred and even if successful, the Japanese Empire will have only bought time before another revolt began.
I also agree with this statement. As long as things are going good for the average Japanese person, they are not going to complain about the government too much. As for the conquered subjects, I have always believed that conquests are only sustained and maintained if the conqueror gives them something that their home government never did or shows them that living under their rule benefits them more then living under their own leaders.