• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
All,

I'm back (mostly). Thanks to Blade! for a great job as interim GM Admin during my absence! :) I understand he's also kept you guys busy in his usual role as GM Events... ;) Anyhow, I'm still working with significant time constraints, so game operation will have to be streamlined in a number of ways.

(1) Every player should decide on a name for their in-game character; all IC-posts should be *signed* with the IC-name. This will make it easier for me (and the players) to keep track of a character and to differentiate between IC- and OOC-posts.

(2) There has been an increased number of OOC-posts in IC-threads, and an erosion of the boundaries between IC- and OOC-posts. Please keep in mind that OOC-posts should be kept to an absolute minimum. In the future, OOC-posts which are in effect thinly disguised IC-posts will be deleted when they are posted in inappropriate locations.

(3) More generally, posts made in inappropriate locations will no longer be moved but deleted; that goes for multiple (mostly) identical posts as well. Moving posts takes a lot of time which the GM Admin can spend more productively elsewhere.

(4) The party roll-call process will be simplified by having a general citizen roll-call every three months that will include a party roll-call element. That process should also eliminate some of the "dead wood" that has accumulated in the citizen registry, and will take care of some problematic developments (people registering anew without deleting old registration entries).

(5) Parliamentary roll-calls will now be organized by the Speaker, not by the CRO/ GM Admin.

(6) There will be one dedicated thread for parliamentary votes.

(7) Elections will be held every three months instead of every second month.

(8) Ministers will be allowed a maximum of *two* official advisors; they may not delegate ministerial duties to someone else (no deputy ministers).

(9) Commission structures will be harmonized and simplified; more on that later.

(10) I will go through the Guide to see if I can find any other areas that would allow for simplification; stay tuned.

Items (7) through (10) are things that, as a GM, I would have preferred to see dealt with in-game by the player community rather than by GM-fiat. Unfortunately, I don't have that luxury at the moment. On the positive side, I don't believe any of those changes will affect gameplay negatively, and think they may actually have a positive impact by cutting down on confusion and increasing transparency.

Mel
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Barkeep49
Can we ask questions here?
Sure. Needless to say, constructive criticism is welcome as well. :)
Originally posted by The Rebel
I think the election change is a bad idea.
You'll have to elaborate on that.
 

unmerged(4021)

Chicago Cub Fanatic
May 24, 2001
23
0
Is having character name in the signature ok for #1?

For #8 could I get some clarification. When I was Education Advisor for Silent Eagle I had no real powers except to advise him. Would this still be counted as one of the two or are we talking more about the role that the Deputy MDIA has played the last couple of terms and the role that heagarty is playing this term at mile? Also I'd like to know how this makes your life easier.
 

unmerged(286)

Ammiraglio di Genova
Sep 16, 2000
105
1
Visit site
...they may not delegate ministerial duties to someone else...

Aww, just when I got appointed... :(

C'mon, there's mess-all to do in this game for us military types... especially now that the MRC's done with, all my character's had to do is sit around in his Isabellan retreat sipping fruit juice and getting sunburnt. Must I really join a political party to get in on the action? :p

...cutting down on confusion and increasing transparency...

But confusion is *good*! It's the fact that this country has a crumbling and inefficient bureaucracy that makes the RPG worth playing. :D
 

unmerged(11366)

Khan of the Crimea
Oct 21, 2002
2.038
12
bgreinhart.wordpress.com
1. Why only *two* advisors? If I could I would have Army, Navy, Air Force, Military Technology, and foreign advisors!!

2. I would echo the previous question--does you name in a signature=signing you name to a post?
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Just to alleviate potential concerns: the above changes will not be implemented instantaneously, since I want to get some feedback first and see if people have additional and/or alternative suggestions. That said...

Originally posted by Barkeep49
Is having character name in the signature ok for #1?
The signature should be in the post itself. This is partly to keep the rule uniform, partly to encourage people to clearly distinguish between IC- and OOC-posts, and partly to avoid confusion if a player changes characters at some point durign the game.
Would this still be counted as one of the two or are we talking more about the role that the Deputy MDIA has played the last couple of terms and the role that heagarty is playing this term at mile?
The term advisor here denotes any official appointment by the Minister, regardless of the specification of duties.
Also I'd like to know how this makes your life easier.
Fewer personnel to keep track of.


Originally posted by Andrea Doria
C'mon, there's mess-all to do in this game for us military types...
Well, Eutopia *is* a political RPG, not a military one... ;) But of course, there's always the Chiefs of Staff, and they can be as active and involved in politics as they like. :)


Originally posted by Hajji Giray I
1. Why only *two* advisors? If I could I would have Army, Navy, Air Force, Military Technology, and foreign advisors!!

2. I would echo the previous question--does you name in a signature=signing you name to a post?
See my replies to Barkeep49. I'd also remind everyone that official Advisors and Deputy Ministers were allowed in the game on the understanding that they would be used sparingly.
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Chipchat2
I am hoping for a rule in which the GM's identify in sig or location if they know they are going to be gone for a period of time.
GM will usually notify either the player community or other GM (who will then in turn inform the player community) if they are going to be absent for a while, hence GM-absences should be public knowledge.
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Second batch of changes...

(11) Parties will no longer be subject to registration criteria other than providing a party programme. I.e., there will be no minimum membership requirement (but see item 13).

(12) Beginning with the next election, I may allow independent candidacies for Parliament and the Presidency, provided it's (a) easily doable and (b) doesn't generate more work for me.

(13) Parties (or independent candidates) that receive fewer than 3 votes in a parliamentary election will be disregarded when assigning seats (to make up for removing registration criteria).

(14) Presidential elections: as of next election, those will be done by alternative vote.

(15) Parliamentary elections: the changes that were implemented at the last election turned out not to be all that hot, so I'm considering another overhaul to keep things interesting. What I'm thinking of at the moment is to ask Blade! (as GM Events) to distribute a number of "floating" votes (equal to the number of actual votes cast by players) according to how well parties (or individuals) did during the previous term and the campaign (especially concerning their response, or lack thereof, to official game events). Thoughts? :)
 

Chipchat2

Wild-eyed fanatic
101 Badges
Feb 7, 2002
240
106
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
  • Sengoku
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Pride of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Hearts of Iron IV Sign-up
  • Stellaris Sign-up
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Crusader Kings II: Reapers Due
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Tyranny: Archon Edition
  • Tyranny: Gold Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: No Step Back
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis III
  • A Game of Dwarves
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • The Kings Crusade
  • Magicka
Originally posted by Melanchthon
GM will usually notify either the player community or other GM (who will then in turn inform the player community) if they are going to be absent for a while, hence GM-absences should be public knowledge.

Then what's up with Vulture?
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Originally posted by Chipchat2
Then what's up with Vulture?
See his April 19 post in the "Things you need to know" thread. ;)
 

jacob-Lundgren

GM/Brutal Werewolf Leader
Moderator
67 Badges
Sep 18, 2001
2.600
48
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Europa Universalis III: Collection
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Hearts of Iron II: Beta
  • Pride of Nations
  • Europa Universalis: Rome Collectors Edition
  • Humble Paradox Bundle
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Victoria 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Stellaris: Galaxy Edition
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Cadet
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Colonel
  • Hearts of Iron IV: Field Marshal
  • Europa Universalis IV: Rights of Man
  • Stellaris: Digital Anniversary Edition
  • Stellaris: Leviathans Story Pack
  • Europa Universalis 4: Emperor
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Europa Universalis III
  • Europa Universalis III: Chronicles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Divine Wind
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Heir to the Throne
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Magicka
  • March of the Eagles
  • Europa Universalis III Complete
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
  • Victoria: Revolutions
  • Europa Universalis: Rome
Originally posted by Melanchthon

(15) Parliamentary elections: the changes that were implemented at the last election turned out not to be all that hot, so I'm considering another overhaul to keep things interesting. What I'm thinking of at the moment is to ask Blade! (as GM Events) to distribute a number of "floating" votes (equal to the number of actual votes cast by players) according to how well parties (or individuals) did during the previous term and the campaign (especially concerning their response, or lack thereof, to official game events). Thoughts? :) [/B]
i really agree with. allows smaller parties with few but very active members who do well/have and use influence to be a major player. and allows bigger parties that do very well to not have to ally every other party in order to govern.
 

unmerged(4271)

General
Jun 6, 2001
2.161
0
Originally posted by Melanchthon
Second batch of changes...

(14) Presidential elections: as of next election, those will be done by alternative vote.

(15) Parliamentary elections: the changes that were implemented at the last election turned out not to be all that hot, so I'm considering another overhaul to keep things interesting. What I'm thinking of at the moment is to ask Blade! (as GM Events) to distribute a number of "floating" votes (equal to the number of actual votes cast by players) according to how well parties (or individuals) did during the previous term and the campaign (especially concerning their response, or lack thereof, to official game events). Thoughts? :)


Q(14): Please, for clarification, define what you mean by "alternative vote". Is this simply continuing the system we have now? Is it a 1st and 2nd choice? Is it ranking a list of candidates?

Q(15): I think that's fine. :)
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Originally posted by heagarty
Q(14): Please, for clarification, define what you mean by "alternative vote".
Originally posted by Phalanx
Everything seems fine, but I want a little clarification on 14.
Check here for an explanation of the alternative vote system. :)
 

The_Hawk

To live, to die, to live again.
109 Badges
Mar 12, 2002
1.285
0
  • Crusader Kings II: Way of Life
  • Victoria 2
  • Victoria 2: A House Divided
  • Victoria 2: Heart of Darkness
  • Warlock 2: The Exiled
  • Warlock 2: Wrath of the Nagas
  • 500k Club
  • Cities: Skylines
  • Cities: Skylines Deluxe Edition
  • Europa Universalis IV: El Dorado
  • Europa Universalis IV: Pre-order
  • Mount & Blade: Warband
  • Mount & Blade: With Fire and Sword
  • Teleglitch: Die More Edition
  • Pillars of Eternity
  • Magicka 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Common Sense
  • Crusader Kings II: Horse Lords
  • Cities: Skylines - After Dark
  • Knights of Pen and Paper 2
  • Europa Universalis IV: Cossacks
  • Crusader Kings II: Conclave
  • Cities: Skylines - Snowfall
  • Europa Universalis IV: Mare Nostrum
  • Stellaris
  • Stellaris: Nemesis
  • Europa Universalis IV: Art of War
  • Arsenal of Democracy
  • Crusader Kings II
  • Crusader Kings II: Charlemagne
  • Crusader Kings II: Legacy of Rome
  • Crusader Kings II: The Old Gods
  • Crusader Kings II: Rajas of India
  • Crusader Kings II: The Republic
  • Crusader Kings II: Sons of Abraham
  • Crusader Kings II: Sunset Invasion
  • Crusader Kings II: Sword of Islam
  • Darkest Hour
  • Europa Universalis IV
  • Ancient Space
  • Europa Universalis IV: Conquest of Paradise
  • Europa Universalis IV: Wealth of Nations
  • Europa Universalis IV: Call to arms event
  • For the Motherland
  • Hearts of Iron III
  • Hearts of Iron III: Their Finest Hour
  • Hearts of Iron III Collection
  • Knights of Pen and Paper +1 Edition
  • Magicka
  • Europa Universalis IV: Res Publica
Mel,

Just to be clear on #15, I assume these would be 'phantom' votes representing the opinions of the NPC population of Eutopia?

If so, that's an idea I like.
 

unmerged(1522)

Mostly harmless
Mar 4, 2001
240
0
Visit site
Originally posted by The_Hawk
Just to be clear on #15, I assume these would be 'phantom' votes representing the opinions of the NPC population of Eutopia?
Yep, that's pretty much it. :)
 

unmerged(10397)

Citizen
Jul 27, 2002
1.023
0
I like that idea.

About 14, I think it's interesting. This could mean that it won't just be a few candidates and no reason to even consider the ones you won't vote for. It will hopefully add thought to the process. Do we have to rank all the candidates? I think it would be better if we did.