I saw the video earlier today before anyone posted on it, and just didn't respond because I was going out and there was no uproar at that point.
If anyone here is familiar with the story of chicken little, my message to the forum will make more sense...
Folks, the sky IS NOT falling... and here is why...
1. The gentleman stated he was unfamiliar with HOI as a series, and was obviously confused about some basic things (like whether he was commanding divisions or regiments).
2. The gentleman was giving a reaction to a brief game play of a late Alpha/early beta game. It was by no means an exhaustive review.
3. It sounds like he spent a few minutes conquering poland, thus he had limited exposure to the battle system. So his information/experience was by no means exhaustive...
Thus, IMHO, the assumption that arrows are not in the game because he did not mention them is flawed.
The gentleman did not mention battleships. Do we all think that battleships are no longer in the game?
He did not mention Russia. Do we all think that Russia is no longer in the game?
Just because he didn't happen to see them, or utilize them, or mention them, does not necessarily mean they aren't in the game.
IT IS VERY POSSIBLE THAT ARROWS AND A COMPLEX AND LOVELY BATTLE PLAN SYSTEM IS IN THE GAME. We just don't know, and we shouldn't assume yes, or no, just because of this one ill informed review (especially when devs have made comments to the contrary). Yes, he has more exposure than most of us on the forums, but that by no means implies that he knows it all, and stated it all in his brief sleep deprived video.
So, I for one am not going to panic, and will simply wait happily for the stream tomorrow to satiate my desire for more information from a more credible source (namely, a cat that comes in pods).
If anyone here is familiar with the story of chicken little, my message to the forum will make more sense...
Folks, the sky IS NOT falling... and here is why...
1. The gentleman stated he was unfamiliar with HOI as a series, and was obviously confused about some basic things (like whether he was commanding divisions or regiments).
2. The gentleman was giving a reaction to a brief game play of a late Alpha/early beta game. It was by no means an exhaustive review.
3. It sounds like he spent a few minutes conquering poland, thus he had limited exposure to the battle system. So his information/experience was by no means exhaustive...
Thus, IMHO, the assumption that arrows are not in the game because he did not mention them is flawed.
The gentleman did not mention battleships. Do we all think that battleships are no longer in the game?
He did not mention Russia. Do we all think that Russia is no longer in the game?
Just because he didn't happen to see them, or utilize them, or mention them, does not necessarily mean they aren't in the game.
IT IS VERY POSSIBLE THAT ARROWS AND A COMPLEX AND LOVELY BATTLE PLAN SYSTEM IS IN THE GAME. We just don't know, and we shouldn't assume yes, or no, just because of this one ill informed review (especially when devs have made comments to the contrary). Yes, he has more exposure than most of us on the forums, but that by no means implies that he knows it all, and stated it all in his brief sleep deprived video.
So, I for one am not going to panic, and will simply wait happily for the stream tomorrow to satiate my desire for more information from a more credible source (namely, a cat that comes in pods).