Quick questions, Quick Answers

[Rylock]

Out of curiosity, has Muslim succession (or Muslims in general) been touched at all? Numerous people have pointed out that all Muslims using purely agnatic succession isn't particularly accurate; compared to Catholics, female rulers were only slightly less common (which is to say rare but with a handful of examples).

No, Muslim succession hasn't been touched -- which is to say they are locked out of changing their succession laws at all. If someone has suggestions as to how that might be changed (without changing the succession laws themselves, which we can't do), I'm all for it -- but that's something for the suggestion thread (or a new one).

 

[Archereon]

No, Muslim succession hasn't been touched -- which is to say they are locked out of changing their succession laws at all. If someone has suggestions as to how that might be changed (without changing the succession laws themselves, which we can't do), I'm all for it -- but that's something for the suggestion thread (or a new one).

Sent a PM to you about the topic.

 

[Rylock]

Sent a PM to you about the topic.

Saw that. Their changes, as I understand it, rely on a custom demesne law and are pretty in-depth. It's not something which can be easily replicated short or integrating their mod.

 

[Carmir23]

This actually appears to be specific to tribal rulers who are not independent themselves -- when they're in a major revolt, they can't call in their lords. Same happens in vanilla with their claimant faction (just tried it out), though their independence faction doesn't do the same thing (and neither does ours).

We may see if we can implement something that gets around this, but for now, yes, that's how it works.

Thanks for clearing that up!

 

[Salociin]

Some of the county CoA like Middlesex and Lancaster appear to have random lines painted over them. The Lancaster CoA for example looks as though the lion symbols were painted over with a blue paint brush. Is this a bug of some kind or WAD?

If WAD, what is the reasoning? Note I'm not using any other mods of any kind other then CK2+ subscribed from Steam Workshop with a clean vanilla installation. I don't even have anything else like the GoT mod yet.

Plus all DLC. Literally all DLC, even the book ones, unit packs, and all that. Could it be one of the vanilla CoA DLC packs interfering? Anyone know which one it might be so I could disable it? I'm asking here because I'm not entirely sure if it is a bug, if it is, this can be moved to bug reports.

 

[Kalista]

Some of the county CoA like Middlesex and Lancaster appear to have random lines painted over them. The Lancaster CoA for example looks as though the lion symbols were painted over with a blue paint brush. Is this a bug of some kind or WAD?

If WAD, what is the reasoning? Note I'm not using any other mods of any kind other then CK2+ subscribed from Steam Workshop with a clean vanilla installation. I don't even have anything else like the GoT mod yet.

Plus all DLC. Literally all DLC, even the book ones, unit packs, and all that. Could it be one of the vanilla CoA DLC packs interfering? Anyone know which one it might be so I could disable it? I'm asking here because I'm not entirely sure if it is a bug, if it is, this can be moved to bug reports.

Clear your gfx cache by deleting the contents within Documents\Paradox Interactive\Crusader Kings II\gfx .

 

[Salociin]

Clear your gfx cache by deleting the contents within Documents\Paradox Interactive\Crusader Kings II\gfx .

Already tried that, didn't change anything. Toggling the DLC CoA on and off didn't do anything either. Here a few screens I grabbed of a couple of the titles affected.

 

[TartanNinja]

I'm wondering if this is intentional, a bug or something else. It's a small thing really but I just want to know why when you, a tribal vassal of a tribal king, gain a duchy title and thus are dubbed "King". I know that independent dukes get called petty kings in the british isles but I'm a vassal, surely my liege an actual king would take offense by this.

 

[AvengerDr]

Playing as a hellenic ruler. I have reformed the Pontificate Maxima and also restored the Roman Empire. All my characters are now both Pontifex Maximus and Emperor. However the Pontifex Maximus title has precedence over the Emperor title. I wish it was the other way around. How can I change this?

Edit: I mean that they are called in-game as Pontifex Maximus instead of Emperor.

 

[Rylock]

Playing as a hellenic ruler. I have reformed the Pontificate Maxima and also restored the Roman Empire. All my characters are now both Pontifex Maximus and Emperor. However the Pontifex Maximus title has precedence over the Emperor title. I wish it was the other way around. How can I change this?

Edit: I mean that they are called in-game as Pontifex Maximus instead of Emperor.

You can't. Religion head titles are primary titles -- which means that they take precedence over other sorts of titles no matter what.

 

[AvengerDr]

You can't. Religion head titles are primary titles -- which means that they take precedence over other sorts of titles no matter what.

Is this hard-coded or can it be changed in the mod? In d_hellenic_pagan there is a "primary = yes". I changed that but it didn't seem to have any effect. If I give the title away, will it work in the game? I mean, will s/he call "Great Holy Wars" or will be I forfeting that ability?

 

[Rylock]

Is this hard-coded or can it be changed in the mod? In d_hellenic_pagan there is a "primary = yes". I changed that but it didn't seem to have any effect. If I give the title away, will it work in the game? I mean, will s/he call "Great Holy Wars" or will be I forfeting that ability?

You'd probably want to get rid of the "dignity = 100" line as well, as that determines primacy among non-primary type titles.

Insofar as what else it will effect, I'm not sure. Anything that checks for "is_primary_type_title" will now return as false -- which means you're going to have some issues after your next succession (as the succession code looks at primary types very differently), but beyond that? It's really anyone's guess. You muck about with that stuff at your own peril.

 

[schwarherz]

I'm wondering if this is intentional, a bug or something else. It's a small thing really but I just want to know why when you, a tribal vassal of a tribal king, gain a duchy title and thus are dubbed "King". I know that independent dukes get called petty kings in the british isles but I'm a vassal, surely my liege an actual king would take offense by this.

It's another incarnation of the vanilla localization bug, unfortunately. Dukes of cultures with the "Duke called King" definition will keep being called "King" even after they're vassalized whereas before they would be called "duke" or "Jarl" or what have you. I'm considering going through the cultures and taking out the "duke called king" lines until paradox fixes the issue but I haven't quite decided yet.

 

[Mrakvampire]

Just found your mod, tried it... And first question.
Why -1 to all stats all the way from age 1 to age 50? and Martial stat always gets negative modifier?
Why minus to vassal opinion till age 50?
It's really confusing.

 

[LordPeter]

Just found your mod, tried it... And first question.
Why -1 to all stats all the way from age 1 to age 50? and Martial stat always gets negative modifier?
Why minus to vassal opinion till age 50?
It's really confusing.

Yeah those static modifiers don't make any sense.
I was thinking of suggesting my personal changes, but somehow forgot to.
Anyway, here they are (though they should maybe belong to suggestions, so I'll link there): http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum...ion-Thread&p=19066312&viewfull=1#post19066312

 

[Absalom526]

I'm Holy Roman Emperor as well as the Grand Duke of Swabia, a kingdom level de jure title. When I switch the HRE to Free Investiture, it doesn't apply to Swabia. When I check the law screen, it seems said law doesn't apply in Swabia. Not only that, but I am not allowed to change Swabias laws at all because as the tooltip says, I cannot change crown laws of Swabia as the HRE. I check the religion screen to check that yes indeed I cannot nominate bishop succession in Swabia but can in HRE.

For reference, I searched the changelog, this thread, as well as extensive googling but cannot find the answer. The fact that this only applies when this mod is active, as well as the tooltip (I also ran test games where I consoled myself to the same situation), makes me believe this is an intended feature of CK2+. Why is this not allowed?

Seems the only solution is to somehow make my heir not get elected and have the Empire Laws supercede the heir as Grand Duke.

 

[Maizel]

Any difference between the Workshop version and the downloaded one?

 

[Kalista]

Any difference between the Workshop version and the downloaded one?

Long as its the same version number ? No.

 

[schwarherz]

Any difference between the Workshop version and the downloaded one?

I go to great lengths to make sure the files are identical. I upload it to the workshop, then delete my local version and download from the workshop before zipping that up and uploading it as the Mediafire link.

 

[FlyingOnion]

I'm hoping to export my current game into EU4, so I did a quick test export to make sure all would be well in the future when I finish up in CK2, however all looked well until I looked at the religion map mode in EU4 and discovered that the Norse faith converted into Animist, as I haven't and probably won't be in a position to reform.
I realise this is a vanilla thing, but is their some way I can get the Norse faith to convert properly without reforming the faith? Or failing all else, what would the console commands be to temporarily give myself the needed counties in CK2+ to reform the faith. I could just give them independence once I've become the Fylkir.

Only because I would like to remain Norse, but being in England, I have little desire to blob my way back into Scandinavia, just to stay Norse post 1453.