By the way - when it comes to the perform mission aggressiveness (passive, aggressive, etc), what does that do? For planes and ships.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
It determines, how damaged/disorganized your units must be for them to stop the sorties. Aggressive will make units fight until they are very low on org (15% of max AFAIK) and like 30% strength, while passive its 50% and 70%. Could be off on numbers, but that's the idea.
With defensive you're quite unlikely to ever lose your planes (unless they get bombed at the air base or overrun by land troops). But with aggressive that could happen much more easily.
Basically defensive allows you to take hands off, but with aggressive you need to micro them. I almost never use aggressive because the risk of losing a whole wing would be catastrophic.
Aggressive maybe in a situation where I see a limping carrier whose CAG(s) need to be deorg'd with INTs just before I go in with fleet assets or NAVs with the intent of sinking it.
Last edited:
Had anybody ever issues with units which refuse to upgrade no matter how long or hard you try?
I've waited now several weeks without a single % of progress. I even placed them in Berlin to see if the province makes a difference without success. I've also tried to spread over the surrounding provinces instead of having them all in one but no matter what I did none of such tanks ever gained a single percentage of progress! Prioritization was also of no effect.. The overall amount of units which wait to receive upgrades is not out of the ordinary.. I'm playing since HoI2 but never had such an issue!
Is this a bug ?
I've waited now several weeks without a single % of progress. I even placed them in Berlin to see if the province makes a difference without success. I've also tried to spread over the surrounding provinces instead of having them all in one but no matter what I did none of such tanks ever gained a single percentage of progress! Prioritization was also of no effect.. The overall amount of units which wait to receive upgrades is not out of the ordinary.. I'm playing since HoI2 but never had such an issue!
Is this a bug ?
Well, how does your production queue look? The useful info should be there, since it's produced like a normal unit. Just starts from different button and gets some discount and exp from the previous state.
Is it so far down your queue that there isn't enough IC for production for it to progress?
- 1
hi,
new question:
is there a way to stop the stocking limit of ressources ? (wich are at 100k maximum for each of 6 main ressources)
waste of ressources make me upset.
just bcoz of that limit, i quickly loose many ressources without reasons.
...i agree there is a limit but not such few !
(100k per ressource is really few to stock)
i would like to "add a zero more" and push that limit to 1.000.000 ressources stocked max for each 6 types.
but i am not sure its possible and where i could custom it (if it is)...
any idea ?
all help will be welcome,
thx a lot !
++
new question:
is there a way to stop the stocking limit of ressources ? (wich are at 100k maximum for each of 6 main ressources)
waste of ressources make me upset.
just bcoz of that limit, i quickly loose many ressources without reasons.
...i agree there is a limit but not such few !
(100k per ressource is really few to stock)
i would like to "add a zero more" and push that limit to 1.000.000 ressources stocked max for each 6 types.
but i am not sure its possible and where i could custom it (if it is)...
any idea ?
all help will be welcome,
thx a lot !
++
As Opanashc say it, there is no way to increase that number.
The only thing you can do is using event to simulate extra stockpile, ex. : when your stockpile is at 90k a event fire, you loose 50k, set a flag and if you reach 10k, and have the flag a event fire and give you 50k.
- 1
hi everyone,
1 QQ : is there a bad side of not signing Molotow-Ribbentropp-Pact playing Germany except the risk of being dowed by SU earlier ? I would like the fact of being already closer to the SU big VP´s and avoiding lots of rivers/forests/swamp and occupied baltic states
thx in advance
1 QQ : is there a bad side of not signing Molotow-Ribbentropp-Pact playing Germany except the risk of being dowed by SU earlier ? I would like the fact of being already closer to the SU big VP´s and avoiding lots of rivers/forests/swamp and occupied baltic states
thx in advance
Against AI or Human players ?
I don't remember seeing a AI Dowing GER so, I guess the Pact does not change anything. A Human player is a totally different story.
AFAIK the only downside is that they can DoW whenever they feel strong enough and their neutrality is low enough.
This has probably been asked a few times, but the search options didn't really give me an answer.
Is it possible to form an alliance with a neutral country while playing as a neutral country yourself? (Turkey and Persia for example) Whenever I try it will say it's "impossible".
Also do non-aggression pacts work outside of scripted events like the molotov-ribbentrop pact?
I'm playing on the Hearts of Iron III Collection on steam.
Is it possible to form an alliance with a neutral country while playing as a neutral country yourself? (Turkey and Persia for example) Whenever I try it will say it's "impossible".
Also do non-aggression pacts work outside of scripted events like the molotov-ribbentrop pact?
I'm playing on the Hearts of Iron III Collection on steam.
I can't say I've tried that myself, so I'm not 100% sure. If I'm wrong I'm sure someone else will correct me.
I suspect the issue is probably neutrality. Yours will have to be low enough to offer it, and theirs will have to be low enough to accept it. Most "neutral" countries start with pretty high neutrality.
- 1
It also adds a few cores which means no partisans and better supply throughput in Prussia.
I'm Nationalist China, it's 1940, I've just annexed Japan. Next opponent is the Allies. But the question I have is this - if I invade French Indochina, and Vichy Fires, will I suddenly be at peace with Vichy and my territorial gains nullified? What's the deal?
Why not take French Indochina?
I definitely want British Malaysia, etc, so it seems a pretty logical next move. Siam is less important.
Unless I'm mistaken, those two are the same thing, aren't they? Siam is affected by the creation of Vichy. Don't they absorb Indochina after Vichy and then, in a standard scenario, become Japan's puppet? Or am I getting things mixed up?