I've already played many many hours of EU4 but I never got the hang of how to calculate your colonial empire.
First off: When should you go where? In which order?
I usually go Carib, South America, North America, Africa, INdonesia. Is there a specific time when invading India makes more sense?
Second: Technology??? So, am I doing something wrong if all relevant Asian nations have about the same tech rank or is that historical to some degree? -> Am I expected to have other advantages?
Third: institutions: Are they working as intended yet? Great idea which needs some adjustments: No matter how good I play manufactories starts in mesopotamia or asia minor and Enlightenment in China.
Fourth: Military. So my colonial history is not up to date. I know Pizzaro took out the Incas with less than 1000 conquistadors, and colonial america seems to be working accordingly, but I dont know much about dutch/french/english colonialisation of Asia. I do however believe they encountered a more fragmented Asia but I'm not sure...
But what I am pretty sure about is that they didnt use a third of there standing army to conquer Indonesia. When I arrive there with 50k, + 10 disc, + 0.2 morale (???), and slightly higher tactics and constantly lose. Again I'm not well versed in colonial history but still I figure colonial armies won while being outnumbered more than two to one.
Are my MIL values expected to be Higher? High army traditions from constant european wars?
IN general: How is this part of colonialism/imperialism (Asia) portraited? What are the advantages that you have as european so that similarly to actual history all of southern asia belonges to the europeans (In a balanced quasi-historical approach to the game not WC-mode). The only thing I could think of (historically) is the abuse of local fragmentation, but by the time I get to India, there are usually 1-4 big blocks.
First off: When should you go where? In which order?
I usually go Carib, South America, North America, Africa, INdonesia. Is there a specific time when invading India makes more sense?
Second: Technology??? So, am I doing something wrong if all relevant Asian nations have about the same tech rank or is that historical to some degree? -> Am I expected to have other advantages?
Third: institutions: Are they working as intended yet? Great idea which needs some adjustments: No matter how good I play manufactories starts in mesopotamia or asia minor and Enlightenment in China.
Fourth: Military. So my colonial history is not up to date. I know Pizzaro took out the Incas with less than 1000 conquistadors, and colonial america seems to be working accordingly, but I dont know much about dutch/french/english colonialisation of Asia. I do however believe they encountered a more fragmented Asia but I'm not sure...
But what I am pretty sure about is that they didnt use a third of there standing army to conquer Indonesia. When I arrive there with 50k, + 10 disc, + 0.2 morale (???), and slightly higher tactics and constantly lose. Again I'm not well versed in colonial history but still I figure colonial armies won while being outnumbered more than two to one.
Are my MIL values expected to be Higher? High army traditions from constant european wars?
IN general: How is this part of colonialism/imperialism (Asia) portraited? What are the advantages that you have as european so that similarly to actual history all of southern asia belonges to the europeans (In a balanced quasi-historical approach to the game not WC-mode). The only thing I could think of (historically) is the abuse of local fragmentation, but by the time I get to India, there are usually 1-4 big blocks.