Simple question. You can put a relative in their throne, so they get your dinasty, for a nice -5% permanent LD reduction, but I wonder if it's even possible to get a PU over them eventually. I've never seen that though.
Another reason to put relatives in their thrones...
Found the CK2 player.That and the potentially incestuous marriages.
That and the potentially incestuous marriages.
I'm assuming this can happen even if the country in question has been a vassal for less than 50 years. If true, then aside from LD and legitimacy (I think relatives start out on weak or average legitimacy), I see little reason to not always put relatives on vassal thrones.If you get a PU over your vassal, you inherit their lands directly
Actually the event which triggers for PUing a vassal means instant-integration.I'm assuming this can happen even if the country in question has been a vassal for less than 50 years. If true, then aside from LD and legitimacy (I think relatives start out on weak or average legitimacy), I see little reason to not always put relatives on vassal thrones.
Will that integration cause a hit to diplomatic relations, like diplo-annexing does?Actually the event which triggers for PUing a vassal means instant-integration.
Not to my knowledge no. I've only seen it in screenshots, not had it happen although. But I imagine it would work the same as PU-based inheritance.Will that integration cause a hit to diplomatic relations, like diplo-annexing does?
No since it's a direct inheritanceWill that integration cause a hit to diplomatic relations, like diplo-annexing does?
I know that. I'm asking if it triggers on countries that have been vassals for less than 50 years. I'm assuming it does.Actually the event which triggers for PUing a vassal means instant-integration.
No problem for that. Play Muscovy, RM one of your vassals with your dynasty, then kill its ruler until you inherit its landsI know that. I'm asking if it triggers on countries that have been vassals for less than 50 years. I'm assuming it does.