I've pushed a commit to the beta branch that makes it stricter; I mostly made the non-Muslim requirements into Muslim requirements, and added that against non-Muslims you cannot have content, craven, or stressed.
Project Balance
- Thread starter Meneth
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Do you have both PB, PB+SWMH, and SWMH enabled? If not, that's why.
Do you use any mods beyond PB and SWMH?
Nope, no child mortality in PB.
If you're using VIET though, I believe there's child mortality in one of its modules.
Yeah, it's a bug Paradox introduced in 1.102. I've reported it here.
I'll probably code another event to assign those laws until Paradox eventually fixes the issue. So next version it should be fixed. I'll probably make something and commit it to the beta branch tomorrow.
Norse-Gael seems reasonable enough.
The Byzantines were in a pretty sorry state in 1066, though their military wasn't quite that bad until after Manzikert. It's needed to encourage Byzantine decline.
That's the kingdom of Cilicia, which was formed by Armenians fleeing the Seljuk invasion of Armenia and most of the rest of Anatolia.
Armies in general in 867 are quite small as there are few buildings around. They grow further into the game.
Making them any larger in 867 would essentially result in them being far too large in 1066.
Outside PB's scope.
I'll have to look into how the Norman event works.
Paradox introduced the bug in 1.102.
I'll probably add an event to sort it out.
I'll probably code in a global flag or something to bypass the requirements.
Yep.
Which is why the extra requirements for enatic-cognatic and enatic won't be present in the gender equality module.
It's now live in the beta branch.
I also ensured women would take appropriate ambitions in the module.
The AI will never use it.
To get to Enatic-Cognatic will take a minimum of two female rulers with good traits and high prestige. To get to Enatic requires another such ruler.
And due to how the law screen is set up, you won't actually see the option unless you scroll down the gender law list
Unaffected currently. The Gender Equality module doesn't actually touch the succession laws; it's applied via a global flag that's checked for in the PB succession law file (and ambitions and job_titles files).
Plus you won't even see them unless you scroll down in the Gender Laws section.It's not something you're forced to use; it's just like any of the other succession laws that are present. Use 'em if you want, don't if you don't. The AI won't be touching it... so what's the issue?
The closest would be allow_laws, which will let you implement the laws normally. They still have to be voted for though.
And I voiced the argument that you'll never even know it's there, which is also what a forum is for
The AI will never use it.
The player will never see it unless he goes out of his way.
This stops me from breaking the Gender Equality module every other time I update succession laws.
Definitely.
I think I'll probably just require that either East Francia doesn't exist, or is held by the guy forming the HRE.
It's a bug Paradox introduced in 1.102. I'll be making an event to assign crown laws sometime today. The patch will be released before I go to sleep today.
PB, PB+SWMH, and SWMH.
Delete the religion folder of ARKO.
Missing CoAs will work with anything.
As long as you use the +compatible version of CulDifCit it should work.
CPR will work with all the rest.
So you should be good to go once you've deleted that religion folder.
Venice is playable for me in the Old Gods start date.
Are you using any mods beyond PB?