That's intended. The main thing is that they should have the "heretic" opinion of one another, since their relationship in history wasn't exactly cordial.
Project Balance
- Thread starter Meneth
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Showing developer posts only. Show all posts in this thread.
Done.I have released a version of Mazdayasna Zaratishtrish compatible with the current version of PB.
@Meneth: Would you mind putting it on the list of compatible mods? Also, I love how clean your work is. Making this compatible meant editing a whole of 5 files!
@Everyone else: If you want to try something new, and feel like playing a Zoroastrian or Persian character, try out my little mod.
You don't get events when they hide; they get a character modifier that says they're hiding in the countryside.
You should still get quite a few prisoners when you're in the same religious group as those you're sieging.
Impossible; it's binary, either they can raid all the time, or they can never raid.
Converting from Sunni to Shia, and the other way around, is supposed to be quite hard. The religious differences persist to this day after all.
Not sure what you mean by not being able to replace your imam though?
Not being able to dismiss your imam appears to be a vanilla thing.
I'm definitely seeing provinces get converted in my test games.
Could you provide the save perhaps? Just zip it up and upload it here or on MediaFire or similar.
Never seen or heard of a bug anything like it.
Sure.
It's not an issue as such; Paradox deliberately prevented Muslims from dismissing their imams. I'm guessing historically those appointments were for life.
Yeah, there's a lot of bugs with tournaments currently, as the code from the New Duel Engine has some issues. I'm off half a mind to just restore the vanilla tournaments until the New Duel Engine's tourneys work better.
1) They're supposed to end up imprisoned. With which factions is that not happening?
4) The thing is that their priority is that their succession law is respected. Banning external inheritance is putting restrictions on their Feudal rights. In the case of Byzantium though they shouldn't care, so I'll put a stop to it in that case when dejure.
As to the rest, I'll set the minimum requirement for launching faction wars higher (85% power rather than 75%), and make the AI slower to use the decision until it hits 110% power. That should help make faction wars a bit less frequent, and a bit stronger when they do happen.
BTW, if anyone wants to watch changes as I make them, you can use the GitHub page.
You can even download whatever version and test it. Though do note that GitHub commits are more likely to be buggy than a regular release.
It's also useful if you've got personal modifications to PB, as then you can just make a fork with your changes.
You can even download whatever version and test it. Though do note that GitHub commits are more likely to be buggy than a regular release.
It's also useful if you've got personal modifications to PB, as then you can just make a fork with your changes.
I haven't done anything to marriages as far as I know.
As long as there's Orthodox provinces within the target you get to bypass almost all holy war requirements, that's probably why.
Blue for the Norse sounds good.
What about Slavic and Romuva? I don't think black really fits any religion.
Edit: Made Slavic green. It's live in the latest commit.
It's a very different green than Islam. Check out the latest commit yourself at the beta branchBut the Islam is green; maybe red or brown or something like this? And thanks for doing this
BTW maybe make Zoroastrian red, orange or yellow (flames, lightness).
I'll see how red Zoroastrians works out.
Yeah, GitHub is pretty cool.
How I've set it up is pretty simple:
The master branch is always the same as the current regular release, like you could download from this thread. The beta branch on the other hand includes changes as I make them; whenever I finish making a change I commit it. This should usually be stable, but there's obviously a higher chance of bugs in the beta branch than in the master.
Looking at the code, that should quite literally be impossible. If you've got any saves where the issue can be replicated, please do send it.
If the regent is in the faction, there are such events. They wouldn't make as much sense to apply to the guardian.Hi, i can play as often i d like, so sorry if this situation is already reported.(PB 3.2.8+VIET(no personnal corrections(patch 1.10 ,DLC only Republic and all portraits if thats matter)
As minor King of Sicilie i took my Uncle as gardian and try to keep it around 100 of opinion, a cousin decided to start a faction in favor of this uncle as king, he send a ultimatum.Of course i reject it.
Both revolt, but my rebel uncle keep the gardianship and education events fire during the war. Finally i capture him so in the Dungeaon he lose the gardian statue. Finally i win the war after the defeat of the Leader. (as usual)
(For the end of the story i realeased him after the war since the relation remains high and get him back as Guardian, he is still very loyal)
I don't know if something can be done to avoid those type of weird situation: (since i don't know how it works)
Maybe some event could fire after i refuse the ultimatum: The pretender gardian receive an event: A/ following the faction and instant win (he just put me in the dongeon easy)B/ following the faction leader but release me (Honnorable character) C/ Refuse the rebellion and stay loyal ( results a paradoxal war where rebels fight against the pretender they want to put in place/OR/ the war don't fire at all and maybe rightful emprisonement on the faction leader.)
Btw I play few hour yesterday that was a great fun thanks for this mod
It probably should, but it sounds more like a major vanilla issue, and not necessarily one that can be fixed well in PB; though it would perhaps be possible to have an even to sever the guardianship.
I'd recommend reporting it as a bug either way, as it should be fixed in the vanilla game regardless of whether I do anything about it.
As of 1.10, manpower has no actual effect on retinues.
You get 5 points of cap from each holding in your realm.
You get 50 points from each castle in your demesne.
You get 20 points from each level of military building in your demesne.
The final value is then multiplied by any retinue modifiers you've got; mainly the tech level in your capital (possibly the average in your demesne or realm; I'm not sure).
So a highly centralized vassal can often have a retinue equally large as his liege. While they scale with size, they don't do so linearly, so retinues actually help move the balance towards vassals not lieges.