OK. Good to hear all your comments. We'll wait and see if we even get the offer from the RD.
Josephus I
Josephus I
Originally posted by IDiO
A tiny little remark from my side on military aquisitions you're proposing. Those who read "The Soldier" know that I have a little bit different idea of good military equipment than stated over here.
The mission of the army is and has always been to throw any and all invaders back into the sea.
This is supposed to be done with having 3 army corps where the 2 infantry corps stay in areas designated them around the coast where they can be set in to delay the attacker until the armoured corps can get there to go for the kill so to speak.
First of all - throwing the invaders back in the sea would be rather hard, or at least harder than just not letting them land, by using modern naval and air forces. It is great to be an island, at least from a defensive point of view. Great Britain was able to hold Germans out for the whole World War 2, using advantage in this two factors, while losing pathetically in ground warfare.
I'm not saying that we do not need any ground forces - that would be madness, but their defensive role would be, so to say, rather limited.
Most important part of our ground forces should be air defence and coast defence. The rest is not that important.
Let me begin with saying that our Navy won't be sunk on day on of a war. The Navy has still got some punch left. Not much but still some. This is a prelimary report I've written. A better and more detailed report will follow.
Depends on who would we fight against. Should it be USA, than it is not even one full day.
I propose we build:
1 Wasp class and
1 or 2 Rotterdam class vessels.
I also suggest the ENDTech comes up with a design for a new minehunting vessel.
Good Idea.
I think it would be more cost effectice to have a airforce mainly consisting of F-16's with a few squandrons of F/A-18's, the F-16 is arguably the worlds most importand current fighter, its in widespread service around the world.
So?.. MiG-21 is most widely used airplane in the world, would you propose us to buy this piece of crap, though? F-16 is fighter-bomber of the past, we need to move on to the future. F/A-18 is good, but extremely expensive, so are EF-2000 and Raphaele.
While anyway, we're banned from trade with US and EU, so what do we do?
*keeps silence for a several seconds, than hits the table with his fist*
We say "screw tham" and move on to another market!!!
I sugest around; (Rough est)
42 F/A-18's
92 F-16's,
2 Boeing E-3A Sentrys,
While I suggest...
120/150 Su-30 (depends on a carriers)
0/30 Su-33 (if we need a carrier after all)
2 A-50 AW&C
2 or 3 air tankers of some kind (there are tonns of them over the world and all of them are basically similar).
Thanks for your attention.
*sits down*
Originally posted by Josephus I
So, I'm asking for a vote. A simple Yeah or Nay. No abstentions please.
There are five of you. Please vote. I'll go with the majority.
Originally posted by Josephus I
One person we have to watch out for is Jake Langley. I made comments in the past to an interviewer that Jake is the shrewdest politician in Eutopia. As a politiican I respect him a lot.
He started a party that no one joined, managed to merge it with another right wing party and formed the Conservative Coalition which he led for awhile.
Now, he leaves the CC, forms another fringe wacko party, is joined by only one other person but will probably succeed in forming a coalition and possibly becoming president.
The people fall for his smooth talking arrogance. If his coalition comes to be, we may need to switch tactics and start campaigning strongly against him; now that O' Flonin's just about finished.
Josephus I
Originally posted by JohnLiep
When is it election times?