"That a cabinet minister is put on trial will arose even the most lethargic reporters for both local and international media outlets. They will reasonably ask what he is charged with, and we will have to respond, 'under the provisions of the Eutopian National Security Act, I am not permitted to tell you'. They will ask about the witnesses, about the evidence, and we will have to repeat 'under the provisions of the Eutopian National Security Act, I am not permitted to tell you'. That will certainly make him sound like a political prisoner.
Political prisoners don't always come from opposition parties. Didn't the Prime Minister of some Southeast Asian country have his deputy Prime Minister thrown arrested and convicted on trumped up charges? That was because he thought the deputy would put on a leadership challenge. As I am committed to supporting someone other than my MDIS of the UMP for President next term, that could be interpreted as a reason why the MDIS was found guilty in secret.
Besides, I don't think this is an ENSA case, because the MDIS signed some documents he shouldn't have, but didn't reveal anything. But anyone who talks about this case would be subject to ENSA charges. So it is not obvious, to me anyway, that the Commissioner of Justice is entitled to this information yet, as there has been no ENSA violation that I am aware of. Therefore, if your investigation concludes that there is an indictable offense, but the available-to-be-disclosed evidence would not permit a conviction, how can you do other than just file it away under 'to be used in case this becomes public knowledge before the statue of limitations runs out', 'how to get a budget increase if Per Truman ever reaches higher office', or whatever you call that file. Sorry, please ignore that last comment, it was inappropriate.
I don't want to repeat Richard Nixon's mistakes and cover this up. I did not authorize the issuance of those documents. You know as much as I do now, so you can investigate to your heart's content, more effectively based on the information I provided. You also know the sensitivity of the evidence, and the reasoning by which it will have to remain secret. This should not be a moral dilemma, it is just one of those quirks, whereby not every crime can be prosecuted."