Josephus I said:One other thing. If we don't run a presidential candidate, then we should decide whom to support.
Amric: I have had nothing but good dealings with him (apart from the back and forth banter in our election campaign). Despite what he has called me, and what I have called him; we have reasonably good relations. He was a good choice of presidential candidate by his party because they know he has good support across the board. He's the most left-leaning in his party.
Of course the only problem with him is his choice of Cabinet. Voting for him means seeing the likes of Langley, Talbott, Vilms, Tilly in government. Not a good thing.
Kenny: OK. He's got little experience and tends to get over-excited. On the other hand, he's the most pliable. That is to say, if we support him we can actually demand a minsitry position or two, because he's now no longer in a position to refuse.
Plus, I really feel bad about the way we back-stabbed him. He made a couple small mistakes that were seized upon by UP and the press.
--Josephus
"I think we should support No-one in the Presidential Race. That way we do not provoke anyone to attack us. I also feel bad about backstabbing John. He was a personal friend of mine. If we have to choose someone to back for President, it would have to be John."