Why do you want your vassals to have gavelkind ? The AI is very bad at managing its own succession crisis; 2nd and 3rd sons always fight for the main title(and win most of the time I think)
I though my kings vassals had their own succession laws since they can raise their crown authorityBut then, if you prefer to have Kingdoms in your Empire, those Kingdoms will be weakened.
But you, ruling the empire should have just one son, so you don't split up your power![]()
I though my kings vassals had their own succession laws since they can raise their crown authority
Primogenture is hands down the best succession law. That's why nearly all monarchies of our history have employed some form of it to stay intact. Elective is very risky if you have a small dynasty and your ruler dies while your chosen heir is still young. It's extremely unlikely for a child to win the elections in a larger empire.
You forgot one crucial fact: Dynasty members get -5 opinion for elective instead of +20.
Dynasty members get +5 for gavelkind, seniority, and turkish. Primo and elective is -5
Elective is only great when all electors are of your dynasty, since you can then choose the best heir from a broad amount of charactersWho cares about dynasty member opinion?
Elective is only great when all electors are of your dynasty, since you can then choose the best heir from a broad amount of characters
But the best way to have lots of candidates is to give them all land, so they breed like rabbitsOf course, you can choose the best heir anyway just be MAKING him an elector - give him a duchy and he's automatically an elector. You don't need to run your kingdom with all-dynasty electors, that would be stupid.
Primogenture is hands down the best succession law. That's why nearly all monarchies of our history have employed some form of it to stay intact. Elective is very risky if you have a small dynasty and your ruler dies while your chosen heir is still young. It's extremely unlikely for a child to win the elections in a larger empire.
Seniority is also good if you have your dynasty spread out through the map and want to unite your dynastic lands under one banner, but otherwise it's a very dangerous due to the likely very rapid succession of 70-year-olds you will be having.
In reality, primogeniture was substantially more flexible than it is in game.In reality primogeniture was preferable.
But then, if you prefer to have Kingdoms in your Empire, those Kingdoms will be weakened.
But you, ruling the empire should have just one son, so you don't split up your power![]()
Elective! Make sure you turn off the alert sound when people changes vote, or it can get extremely annoying.
I recently found out you can breed children with more than 1 positive traits. It's rare, but I had a few heirs that is a (genius + attractive). So elective allows you to have the best ruler AND increases relations with all your vassals.
Elective breeding![]()