I know what a pre-sentient species is in gameplay terms: a species that has the potential to obtain sentience within a few million more years of evolution, and can be uplifted with genetic engineering.
However, are there any species in real life that fit that definition? Certainly apes, chimpanzees, gorillas, whatever you call them would probably apply, given that they're similar to us humans (a chimp in a suit is even the picture for the epigenic triggers technology), but then again you don't see gorillas taking up space on Sol as pre-sentient species pops. What about dolphins, whales, or some of the smarter dog and cat breeds?
Also, what would a Gaia world look like? I've seen that concept in science fiction a few times, but I have a hard time comprehending it. Earth as we know it is already "perfect" for life: the right place in the right galaxy, the right distance from the right star, the right planet size and plate tectonics, a breathable atmosphere, the list goes on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth_hypothesis. What would a theoretical gaia world have that Earth doesn't? Gaia planets are said to be suitable for all forms of life, but doesn't Earth technically fit that description? We have deserts, rocky mountains, arctic regions, tundra, etc. Literally every climate I've ever seen in science-fiction has been some variation of a real-life Earth biome, yet why is Earth over-simplified into a rocky "continental world" with gaia being some sort of perfect world that Earth somehow isn't?
Would it basically be Earth, but with life absolutely everywhere? Would it basically be Earth without any deserts of arctic regions, where every square inch is rich in nutrients for growing food and where the air is ripe with chemicals that cure disease and poison from plants that produce the most delicious food possible? I also question the idea of a planet suitable for all forms of life: environments are not objectively "harsh" or "habitable" and Stellaris reflects this with climate preference with different species having varying levels of tolerance for different climates, but no environment can be perfect for every lifeform. There is no "perfect" climate, which is the idea the gaia world seems to be built around. Even "good" climates can be bad: take a desert animal to the lush South American rainforests and they'll probably die.
However, are there any species in real life that fit that definition? Certainly apes, chimpanzees, gorillas, whatever you call them would probably apply, given that they're similar to us humans (a chimp in a suit is even the picture for the epigenic triggers technology), but then again you don't see gorillas taking up space on Sol as pre-sentient species pops. What about dolphins, whales, or some of the smarter dog and cat breeds?
Also, what would a Gaia world look like? I've seen that concept in science fiction a few times, but I have a hard time comprehending it. Earth as we know it is already "perfect" for life: the right place in the right galaxy, the right distance from the right star, the right planet size and plate tectonics, a breathable atmosphere, the list goes on: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rare_Earth_hypothesis. What would a theoretical gaia world have that Earth doesn't? Gaia planets are said to be suitable for all forms of life, but doesn't Earth technically fit that description? We have deserts, rocky mountains, arctic regions, tundra, etc. Literally every climate I've ever seen in science-fiction has been some variation of a real-life Earth biome, yet why is Earth over-simplified into a rocky "continental world" with gaia being some sort of perfect world that Earth somehow isn't?
Would it basically be Earth, but with life absolutely everywhere? Would it basically be Earth without any deserts of arctic regions, where every square inch is rich in nutrients for growing food and where the air is ripe with chemicals that cure disease and poison from plants that produce the most delicious food possible? I also question the idea of a planet suitable for all forms of life: environments are not objectively "harsh" or "habitable" and Stellaris reflects this with climate preference with different species having varying levels of tolerance for different climates, but no environment can be perfect for every lifeform. There is no "perfect" climate, which is the idea the gaia world seems to be built around. Even "good" climates can be bad: take a desert animal to the lush South American rainforests and they'll probably die.