• We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
20200707173051_1.jpg

Final map of a CK2 MP game I ran for over a year with some friends. Can you spot the humans players ? Hint: we were 4.

Not gonna enter into details because this game was crazy enough (Madrid is currently a Khazar Tengri province, Benevento is Khazar although those adopted Orthodoxy - yeah weird things happened).
Run down of the most important stuff:
- we were originally 5. The 5th player started as the Duke of Flanders, but was too busy and left after a couple sessions. But he still had the time to plunge the Frankish Empire in severe turmoil by chain murdering his liege (including, yes, Charlemagne). Didn't contribute to make France a stable realm and left it open to invasions by the Muslims, and later, by the Vikings and Saxons.
- one player went away for a while (he went to Japan for an internship, so it was pretty much impossible to schedule sessions with him). He started as the Duchess of Kiev, and did have enough time to reform the Slavic faith before having to give up. That left the Slavic religion as a major religion in this world, albeit after the loss of much of their Northern lands to Vikings and Finland their main stronghold is the Empire of Carpathia, as well as the kingdom of Poland, the Warriors of Perun and the Khaganate of Somogy.
- said player came back much later on, but he gave up on the Slavs and instead decided to play as England, a Reformed Germanic Norse kingdom (the AI reformed the Germanic faith by itself). He went on to form the Empire of Britannia, and he has some pretty OP vassals who are busy conquering the world.
- another player started in Scotland, with the aim of establishing a powerful Scottish kingdom. But the Vikings disagreed, launching wave after wave of planned invasions against him. With other realms monopolizing the holy orders, he had troubles defending himself and it was pretty clear it was a very unfun game for him. He tried making his branch of the dynasty die off so another branch, which had converted to the Germanic religion, could take over, but it failed and he had a game over.
- after his game over he decided to restart as the French, Reformed Germanic count of Champagne, and well you can see the result on the map, with a twist - he secretly converted to the Cathar religion, and once he was strong enough openly revealed his true faith. Catharism became the mainstream branch because Catholicism was pretty much restricted to the Papacy by that point, and much of France is Cathar.
- the 3rd player is easy to spot. It's of course Suomi, who reformed his Finnish paganism and became the head of his religion. He's very big, but much of it came from an invasion of Sweden. Sweden had been a major power until that point (reforming the Germanic religion and conquering vasts swaths of land), but the Swedish king had only one kingdom title, so when Finland invaded the kingdom of Sweden he vassalized all of Sweden's lands.
- and then, myself is fairly easy to spot too. Started as the Daufingi count of Salerno - or Lukania as the Greeks would have it. Catholic Lombard, became Italian and converted to Orthodoxy after joining the Byzantine Empire. Slowly united Sicily, then lcuky inheritances granted me the kingdom of Sardinia (which also had lands in Dalmatia and Carinthia), then the kingdoms of Serbia and Croatia too. Joined an independence faction (directed by a Confucian Han who somehow had become Duke of Achaia). The Emperor wouldn't hear the voice of reason and so we had a civil war, but fortunately my side's AI was clever enough to make our superior numbers count. Then I lazily expanded in Italy and mostly in Northern Africa (with an eye on Egypt as next target). Main pride right now is having converted the huge empire of Kanem-Bornu to Christianity thanks to missionaries.

At this point huge defensive pacts make any war a hassle for all of us, and turn the game into a waiting one. On top of that, we've all achieved what we wanted to achieve, with level 3 or 4 great works and no threat whatsoever remaining. Plus, we have a new player interested in joining, so we've decided to stop this game here and we'll start a new one. MP CK2 is definitely fun though
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
I really can't believe you conquered all of that in less than 100 years starting as a duke without cheats AND without your vassals doing some conquering of their own.

I am grateful you ask, will write up a proper AAR in time, and can assure you this is a vanilla Ironman game.
The only setting put to easy is shattered retreat (which is turned off, I generally do so).

Here a teaser of the achievements of Ioustinos, Basileus of Makedon, Shahanshah of Persia, Lord of the Steppe and Despot of all of India.
His exploits mimic those of Alexander the Great himself! Except for dying of poor health age 33.

9182155e63e59a6a41454e06bcccfcdf.png


Now excuse me, I have to invade the Caliphate for Jerusalem and what's left of Syria and Arabia before pressing his claim on the ERE and reforming Rome, while preparing the next feast for the Wolf Warriors he's now part of while being stricly vegetarian as a Jain.
:D

Zeus Io Vult!

P.S. Beg to differ please I started as Count, 1 county. Thebes 769, if you wonder.
 
I started as Latin Empire in the Latin Empire start, and when I called it a day it turned out I was on the Hundred Years War start.

You start as a French Catholic interloper with a weaker realm than some neighbours who hate you, but 10k event troops and strong claims on duchies in Thrace, Greece, and bits of Bulgaria. I pursued those, and changed culture to Greek ASAP to get on with the vassals, and before I could change to Orthodox there was a crusade for Egypt.

I managed to win that by getting in early and racking up some score. I placed my spymaster and chancellor to see enemies coming and kept vassal ships offshore to bail when I needed to. Once the other Chrisitans showed, I did some sieging. Then I gave Egypt to my brother because what would I do with Egypt? It's only going to be trouble. He thanked me by plotting to murder me for the rest of his life.

So, I got all the starting claims and the rest of the Kingdom of Thrace before the first ruler died. I also went Orthodox and watched about eight crusades/jihads swing Egypt and Jerusalem back and forth while I stayed out of it. I got Bulgaria and Wallachia pressing vassal claims (including a baron for Bulgaria) with not too much gore.

I went with kingdom viceroys, generally putting in somebody I wouldn't mind as a councillor, and had a very stable time of it. Starting as an Empire does make some things a lot simpler.

After that I picked off Serbia on a vassalisation CB, gradually put Venice back in their box, and nicked duchies off Rum when all the other Muslims were busy.

I generally played strong, stable, low risk. I filled every holding slot in my counties with cities, so the finances are good; and I maxed my castles (except shipyards and cataphract buildings). I usually had as many personal troops as total vassal troops. I didn't raise retinues -- I don't do the single unit flank thing, and I was handling raiders easily enough to not need a rapid reaction force.

At one point I inherited Flanders but granted it independence because, again, trouble.

I mostly avoided alliance entanglements, except once I helped Hungary survive HRE border creep by joining their defence against Bohemia. Strangely, after that, the HRE suddenly wanted to marry my children.

I've decided to call it a day now because I'm stronger than everybody else (but not as strong as a jihad, but Egypt/Jerusalem soak those). From here I'd be looking at picking off a bit more of Venice, and a century or more grinding across Anatolia one duchy HW at a time when the other Muslims are busy. Can't see any point expanding into Crimea, and I like Hungary as a buffer state rather than a vassal.

Hmm, if I'd stayed catholic and converted the Greeks, maybe I could have gotten a crusade for Anatolia...
 

Attachments

  • ck2_1.png
    ck2_1.png
    7,4 MB · Views: 0
Last edited:
  • 1Like
  • 1Love
Reactions:
Ioustinos has returned from India, age 68.

40526da73b8226bc1583cd3951aa3c27.jpg


P.S. Digged up a screenshot of his inheritage 54 years ago for better strategic understanding (pun intended)- this is what he started out with.

c793e082f6033f4a9c10adaff956c2bf.jpg
 
Last edited:
I felt like I had to play this one to the bitter end for the bragging rights. I have the Seven Centuries achievement, but not really, since I got it together with Persistent Survivor for a 876-1453 game. Only now do I feel I have actually deserved it.
So see here my women-led Soviet Slavic Union:
121CF5B21B39488E37DBC3A996A47686790D4A7A

As you can guess from this second screenshot, I mostly played Dobrava Turovs:
21283F5F8894618E2D07E3607A697BE6ADF83684
I also, never, ever want to do such a thing again.
 
  • 4Like
Reactions:
I also, never, ever want to do such a thing again.

Amen to that, these large realms are so ridiculous to play o_O
In my defense, I wasn't planning to do any of that upfront.

Final conquest of Ioustinos, 890 AD shortly before his death. Below the territory lost to nomad agitation.

20200801205009_1.jpg

20200805163200_1.jpg
 
  • 1Like
Reactions:
5187D55061E0188E97B75DBD4E91C19C7B2691CE

The Monarch's Journey challenges got me back into the game but I felt like doing my own thing instead.

When I was first learning Crusader Kings 2, I tried a Miaphysite Armenia game and promptly gave up early because I found it too difficult to expand. Now that I've clocked over 1000 hours, I decided to give them another shot. The Armenian Pahlavuni start in 1066 is particularly luck-based since they start out with their titles being contested by the Seljuks (basically you have to cross your fingers and hope the Basileus can squeeze out a stalemate or you're boned) but I've played so much EU4 that I'm used to the idea of losing hours of gameplay over stupid RNG things like that.
This was incidentally one of my first serious games where I played as a vassal for the first few generations, almost got a game-over for a few silly reasons: I married one of the princesses of Hungary then pressed a claim for her to become Queen of Hungary. She then promptly slept with one of her vassal dukes (I had the affair covered up, then had him assassinated) then since our firstborn son was in her court, she fricking matrilineally married him off to some worthless Italian baron's daughter and died. That caused him to inherit Hungary, which nearly gave me a game over since the Emperor of Byzantium forbade him from being my successor (my titles would have left Byzantium and gone to Hungary after all) and my inheritor was going to be the stupid non-dynastic Italian grandson that my son had with the Italian baron's daughter I mentioned earlier. As a 57-year old man I had to aggressively wage a war against my own son to get him knocked down to a count so he'd return to my inheritance line, then I had to murder off all of his non-dynastic children to make sure the inheritance line switched back to the Pahlavuni instead of the random Italian baron line. I'm still positive that the Queen of Hungary must have been deliberately trying to sabotage my inheritance line with her meddling.

Now, I know what you're thinking about the map: "He just waited for the Fourth Crusade to give him independence." In truth I had already become the king of Armenia, Daylam (or 'Hyrcania' in Byzantine cultures), and Egypt, and I broke away on my own a few years before the Fourth Crusade. Amusingly I actually got called in to fight against the Fourth Crusade since one of the Byzantine dukes I had allied with had become Emperor due to an internal war, but the Seljuks were still pretty powerful and I wasn't willing to risk draining out my levies defending Byzantium from the crusaders.

1D2970A4C88EF5BDCFE9F498ABB20C84B45ADFDB


Later on, the game gave me a few lucky breaks: firstly, the Crusader Kingdom of Egypt was set to be inherited by a prince in the HRE. Since the Emperor didn't care about Egypt's line of inheritance, he let me bring Egypt's heir into a matrilineal marriage, hence how I took all of Egypt. As for the religion map: don't ask me how, but the Seljuks got ousted by the Gokdepe dynasty, who have been firmly, unwaveringly Yazidi and maintained a deathgrip on the Sultanate of Persia despite numerous civil wars and independence claims. They're weak enough that I could probably invade them but I'm honestly so impressed by this that I figured I'd just leave them be and see what they'd do.

0CC52AFD5DF2F4DAD42B8AEE30D5953BFAE5F886

And a bonus. This was from just after Holy Fury got released. I wanted to see if I could form the Volga-Ural empire and I may have taken most of Russia and Finland while I was at it.
 
Last edited:
1598100171276.png


Above is just after the death of the grandfather of the current character, who was a natural demon child (demon worshippers are disabled). At the age of 16, he had inherited the Kingdom of Frisia and claims on the Holy Roman Empire and Eastern Roman Empire. He first used the excommunication of the emperor who had been elected over him to gain support for his claim on the Holy Roman Empire, then spend several years biding his time and cleaning up HRE vassals that had gone independent (I believe due to invalidation of an independence war when he succeeded in pressing his claim). Then, when some claim wars over the ERE started, he pressed his own (weak) claim, and conquered the Eastern Roman Empire.

He then spent numerous years campaigning (against more of the vassals-gone-independent and against some muslims in Africa and the Middle-East) until, at the age of 55, after 39 years of rule, he combined the two titles he held into the one true Roman Empire - after all, there was no one left to contest the claim that he was the true successor of the Roman Empire. He then spent the last years of his life conquering Arles and the northern parts of France in the name of Rome's imperial conquest, as well as several holy wars in the area of Poland. Finally, he died at the age of 66 after fifty years of rule, reforming the Roman Empire, which can now call on an army of over 70 000 people, and stretches from the North Sea to Sicily and from Sicily to Little Asia.

And his ambitious, shrewd, strong grandson with great martial ability is anxious to expand the Roman Empire to fill up it's former borders...
 
  • 1Love
  • 1Like
Reactions:
BDD286DDC9D8705E93FFDA99F0DABACC89EEB703

I ended the Monarch's Journey with something like this. Played a couple of years after this, but the general idea still stands. That is what you're supposed to do, right?

I haven't really spent a lot of time on the challenges, because (see an earlier post of mine) I wanted to properly finish a Charlemagne start date game.

There is one Monarch Journey challenge game where I have completed 2 out 3 challenges, the third has probably become impossible, but I have ended up in a very interesting situation. I may go on with that one, I may wait a couple of days and continue with CK 3 instead.

32F674C29D743E933282F0800C6269B03D12DCF1

Perhaps my starting character isn't entirely obvious from that screenshot. (By the way I now remember I also have some counties in Sicily which aren't in the screenshot).

I started as Harald Hardrade. Pretty standard start with winning the war for England, but I was overconfident I could keep an elective and a primogeniture kingdom together. After one or two characters, I lost the election for Norway - and with it the event troops. The timing was such that the first crusade was about to start, so I went that way. Right after winning and taking over as the crusader queen in question, I pondered on my situation and thought "this is bad - I only own the de jure kingdom". Indeed, though I started a war for Tripoli, a Jihad was soon called and I managed to win the war before losing the jihad and ending up as a one county ruler. Expansion opportunities were pretty much limited to a couple of one county rulers in Sicily. The second crusade was redirected to Byzantium, which did give me the opportunity to grab a county or two extra in Sicily. Somewhere along the way I went native to Sicily, that is Greek-cultured.
Then it was back to "normal" expansion with the occasional holy war, war on revolts and regular CK2 taking whatever opportunity you can.

All in all, with some easy wars and some very intense moments, this turned out to be the most fun I had with this game in a while.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions:
100 years into the game,trying to decide between Slavic Union or Russia. On the one hand, I already have almost all of the SU; on the other hand, I'm Russian...

ck2_116.png


Also, Sapmi, Eire, and Burgundy have formed, while western and central Europe is one big mess. Lombardy is still Lombard. I can't see anything that would trigger early crusades - the Umayyads are south of the Pyrenees, Braunschweig has stayed Germanic, and while Svithjod holds Aquitaine, they've converted to Catholicism.
 
100 years into the game,trying to decide between Slavic Union or Russia. On the one hand, I already have almost all of the SU; on the other hand, I'm Russian...
The Slavic Union and the Russian Empire are both rare in the game in that creating either one of them grants special game-technical benefits. :)

If you form the Slavic Union you will get a bloodline.

The holder of the Russian Empire has the ability to upgrade tribes to castles with only a tier 1 hillfort (instead of the usual tier 4 requirement). This is because its supposed to be a representation of the Russian tsardom come early and enable you to "colonize" eastward into Asia as the Russian Empire did. :)

I'd recommend deciding on which benefit is better for you and go for that one. :)
 
  • 2
Reactions:
100 years into the game,trying to decide between Slavic Union or Russia. On the one hand, I already have almost all of the SU; on the other hand, I'm Russian...

View attachment 624653

Also, Sapmi, Eire, and Burgundy have formed, while western and central Europe is one big mess. Lombardy is still Lombard. I can't see anything that would trigger early crusades - the Umayyads are south of the Pyrenees, Braunschweig has stayed Germanic, and while Svithjod holds Aquitaine, they've converted to Catholicism.

Who did you start as?
 
The Slavic Union and the Russian Empire are both rare in the game in that creating either one of them grants special game-technical benefits. :)

If you form the Slavic Union you will get a bloodline.

The holder of the Russian Empire has the ability to upgrade tribes to castles with only a tier 1 hillfort (instead of the usual tier 4 requirement). This is because its supposed to be a representation of the Russian tsardom come early and enable you to "colonize" eastward into Asia as the Russian Empire did. :)

I'd recommend deciding on which benefit is better for you and go for that one. :)

Whichever I do, I'll most likely do the other in a different play-through, so right now I'm thinking about who else I want to try playing as. Might be fun to form the SU as Polish or Bohemian - Russia doesn't offer options like that. Bloodline is nice, but I already forged one and married in two others, and haven't done a legendary journey yet. So... it's currently leaning towards Russia.

Who did you start as?

Dobrava of Kiev. I'd AAR it, except I have no screenshots from the first two rulers.
 
Dobrava of Kiev. I'd AAR it, except I have no screenshots from the first two rulers.hA

I was going to say, "Nice job rolling back the nomads" but you don't appear to have Horse Lords. Still a good job, but tbh, I don't know if it's possible to do that well as Kiev in the 769 start with HL active, at least not without a lot of cheese and exploits.

As for whether to stay as Rus or go SU, mechanically, given what I see on the map, you don't need the special ability Karlington mentioned and the bloodline for forming the SU would be more useful to you, but you might want to stay as Rus for RP reasons.

Have you reformed the faith and gotten your holy order yet? If so, they may hold some baronies you need to form the SU, and that can be tricky. You don't really want to expel them , but you might not be able to own all the required baronies without doing so, unless you convert to another faith.
 
The holder of the Russian Empire has the ability to upgrade tribes to castles with only a tier 1 hillfort (instead of the usual tier 4 requirement). This is because its supposed to be a representation of the Russian tsardom come early and enable you to "colonize" eastward into Asia as the Russian Empire did. :)


This is a great tip, Karlington. Thanks for sharing.

If I ever decide to try again for the "Never Start a Land War in Asia" achievement, I'm definitely going to try to form the Empire of Rus along the way. If I deactivate the Horse Lords DLC, the Steppe should be tribal the whole way from Lithuania to Mongolia. Based on what you said above, the Rus Emperor I should be able to quickly convert tribes to feudal settlements, which would help greatly with supply and levies when moving East.

Let me know if I'm thinking of this correctly.
 
I was going to say, "Nice job rolling back the nomads" but you don't appear to have Horse Lords. Still a good job, but tbh, I don't know if it's possible to do that well as Kiev in the 769 start with HL active, at least not without a lot of cheese and exploits.

As for whether to stay as Rus or go SU, mechanically, given what I see on the map, you don't need the special ability Karlington mentioned and the bloodline for forming the SU would be more useful to you, but you might want to stay as Rus for RP reasons.

Have you reformed the faith and gotten your holy order yet? If so, they may hold some baronies you need to form the SU, and that can be tricky. You don't really want to expel them , but you might not be able to own all the required baronies without doing so, unless you convert to another faith.

Yeah, it's a nomad-free lifestyle for me!

Faith is reformed, and holy order already vassalized. Same culture, head of faith, de jure territory - no trouble at all.

This is a great tip, Karlington. Thanks for sharing.

If I ever decide to try again for the "Never Start a Land War in Asia" achievement, I'm definitely going to try to form the Empire of Rus along the way. If I deactivate the Horse Lords DLC, the Steppe should be tribal the whole way from Lithuania to Mongolia. Based on what you said above, the Rus Emperor I should be able to quickly convert tribes to feudal settlements, which would help greatly with supply and levies when moving East.

Let me know if I'm thinking of this correctly.

Empire of Rus and Empire of Russia are two separate things, actually. You need to hold Rus in order to form Russia, which is the one that grants the special ability - and Russia is huge. It's pretty much what I hold on that screenshot (minus a few bits in the west) plus everything up to the Ural mountains. Including Crimea, which usually means having to go up against the Byzantines - although by the time you hold all the rest, you're probably strong enough to handle them anyway.

You can see the requirements here.
 
  • 1
Reactions: