I get it, especially in tribal systems or in low crown authority circumstances, the king would have very little ability to intervene (though I think that's still not quite historically accurate), but please please please do something about family members. I regularly run into the situation where I grant sons titles when I go over limit and they wind up losing them to some other vassal declaring war. Even when I have a formal alliance with said son I can't intervene militarily. That's simply insane as a historical matter. There is no way that a king (or other independent ruler) would sit by and watch a his sons' lands (particularly ones that he gave them) be taken by unrelated vassals.
Right now, all I can do (if I'm even able - it sometimes isn't possible) is feed the kid gold so he can buy mercenaries (though I can't guarantee that he actually hires them). Rulers should be able to join vassal wars for landed children, or should get some sort of stronger "stick" to use against vassals who declare such wars (like an imprisonment reason or something). The current system makes it hard to spread titles around to children without putting them at risk which I think detracts from both the accuracy and enjoyment within the game.
Right now, all I can do (if I'm even able - it sometimes isn't possible) is feed the kid gold so he can buy mercenaries (though I can't guarantee that he actually hires them). Rulers should be able to join vassal wars for landed children, or should get some sort of stronger "stick" to use against vassals who declare such wars (like an imprisonment reason or something). The current system makes it hard to spread titles around to children without putting them at risk which I think detracts from both the accuracy and enjoyment within the game.
- 8
- 2