Neither Quebec nor Canada were "densely populated". Whole French Canada, which was a huge territory had like 50 000 population. Brits down south had almost 2 million.
I couldn't read past this. Minnesota is a frozen wasteland in the winter. It's survivable in the spring/summer, even hot(!), but so is Alaska, Svalbard, and Siberia.
Thanks for the lol.
Also the times were colder back then, not even counting the technology of robes now![]()
Is that a decision or event? How the hell did it put you so close to western tech? I need to nerf the shit out of that.
In this context, arctic means inhospitable without modern comforts. There was a reason the Northern USA and Canada were so sparsely populated; it was probably due to the fact, that no one can live there. Anyway, the arctic circle is a more recent calculation to denote the area much farther north.
All I had to do was press "reform government" in the Native tab. in order to reform the government you need two things to happen: you need to have got all the native tech (not hard, although i had amazeballs rulers actually) and you need to have a core next to the core of a western power.
it gives you 25 technologies (I don't know that it is a fixed amount) of the western neighbor, and changes you to an administrative monarchy
Nah, it changes you to the government of the neighbor. I got feudal monarchy when I reformed off of England's colonial nation. And I got 22 techs; seems like its based on the relative tech difference.
I do not live in "the arctic". Sure Minnesota might be cold sometimes but ARCTIC? no. that's beyond the wall up canada-way. Your tooltip says it's devoid of vegetation. Have you ever even been here? I'm sure its scandinavianesque aside from the lack of real mountains. I mean we have some small ones, but we have forest covering the north and plains and oak savanna in the south. We've got moose and wolves and bears and loons to serenade you to sleep. We've got giant rats known as deer all over the place we have so much vegetation. And we've got the wonderful boundary waters that is unlike anywhere else, and that's way up to the north, and it's just trees and water as far as the eye can see. This is not the arctic. Perhpas you can say, maybe around the great lakes (although just make it so they get harsher winters, it's not arctic there either!). But you went further and included the headwaters of the Mississippi, the province known as "Minnesota" in your arctic climate map.
...
Finally I just played for like 8 hours straight, so, I mean, I like your game. But it's not arctic here >.<
we're you left being 6 tech behind the neighbor? Like i said, i had to wait until 1580 before I got to any decision to reform the government; the colonies were all south of my vision. when i stopped playing last night, spain had just founded a colony in nova scotia and i was nuzzled up next to the english colony in louisiana; i had colonies in florida and massachucetts myself (i was leaving a wide berth for the white people) and surrounding the great lakes. I think i was like 3/4/4 or something in tech before I took the decision. i can check later to be sure though, but i ended 6 behind. as for the government, okay, it changes you to theirs, and i think that's what it was, administrative monarchy. i assume that's a thing.
also, humorously, when i first encountered the english they had the opinion of being threatened of me. i assume this was this because of my 70,000 strong army of archers who would probably die to a regiment of english if i even tried
Yeah, admin monarchy is a real and very profitable government. I was just sad I didn't get noble republic; I had expected that since I was a democracy, and pre-COP if you took the reform decision as a tribal democracy you got a republic.
Not sure if I was exactly 6 techs behind but something close to that, yeah.
Neither Quebec nor Canada were "densely populated". Whole French Canada, which was a huge territory had like 50 000 population. Brits down south had almost 2 million.