Will it be playable? It is not listed as one of the unplayable merchant states yet it was one of the big merchant states early on in the CK period.
Originally posted by Wasa
I think that we could have endless discussions here in the Forum as to who will be playable..but, until Paradox says something more about the game..no one knows for sure.
I feel that the question about free cities have been brought up several times in several threads, IMO Pisa should be an important free city, playable or not..![]()
Originally posted by Aetius
I suppose that would go for Amalfi, Sorrento, Genoa and Venice in Italy as well. But some cities switched between Duchies and Republics, e.g. Milan. I suppose they should be playable...
Originally posted by Greven
I think its rather clear... You can play Emperor, King and Independent Duke. Period.Thus Pisa? Nope.
/Greven
Can we be Imperial Knights?Originally posted by Greven
I think its rather clear... You can play Emperor, King and Independent Duke. Period.Thus Pisa? Nope.
Originally posted by Demetrios
Those republics that were listed were probably only examples. There were plenty more republics around at the time (Pisa, Iceland, Jamtland, etc.)
Originally posted by Aetius
I suppose that would go for Amalfi, Sorrento, Genoa and Venice in Italy as well. But some cities switched between Duchies and Republics, e.g. Milan. I suppose they should be playable...
Originally posted by Greven
.......... This means that a powerless dynasty officially titled duch or even a Petty King will be treated as a Count. Thus not playable.
/Greven
Originally posted by Aetius
The problem with that approach is the difference in use of titles in different places, I heard somewhere that there were around 300 dukes in Sicily...
Originally posted by Sonny
The other three were mentioned as merchant republics which Iceland and Jamtland are not. But Pisa was - so I just wondered if it was playable without thinking that it was not a kingdom or duchy. Silly me.![]()