Is it a british build ship?
None of this class were built in the United Kingdom....
Is it a british build ship?
H-Class submarine?
HMS Hermes, caught off Ceylon.
She had a sort of sister-ship, that wasn't built at the same time, wasn't the same size and couldn't operate aircraft but did look exactly like her.
Underwater torpedo tubes were standard on battleships before WWI, when people still expected the broadside gun duels happening like 8 kilometers or closer, and coastal defence ships should expect something closer, so people thought torpedoes would play a big part.what i find the most curious is the 2x 240mm, 4x120mm AND 4x 457mm Torpedo tubes, supposedly under the water-line.
If i am not totally off-track here, he was born in 1889.
Both Nuevo de Julio and Independencia were laid down in 1889 with the former launched in 1890, the latter in 1891. Wikipedia is wrong on this. they both were completed on the same day the 26th of November 1892.
Since it is the picture of Libertad in 1936, which is actually the renamed Nuevo de Julio, i'd wager you got your hint from wikipedia
since 1931 those ships apparently were no longer rated as "coast Defence Battleship", but as "armoured gunboats".
During WW2 Libertad was a Depot Ship and afterwards was used until 1968 as a pilot hulk called Interseccion.
altho Uk build, it was commissioned to the Argentinian Navy
what i find the most curious is the 2x 240mm, 4x120mm AND 4x 457mm Torpedo tubes, supposedly under the water-line.
A piece of trivia (not picture) to kill the time: I discovered that a WWII warship was actually named in Sanskrit, or more precisely, the ship's name is the transcription of a Sanskrit word, and it's not due accidental similarity in spelling.
Neither. It's indirect though, the ship's namesake is not the Sanskrit word, but someone/something named after the word, similar to how USS England is directly named after a person named England, and indirectly after England the kingdom.Intriguing. Which navy was the vessel in, US or Soviet maybe?
Neither. It's indirect though, the ship's namesake is not the Sanskrit word, but someone/something named after the word, similar to how USS England is directly named after a person named England, and indirectly after England the kingdom.
No, and the renaming of Hercules happened outside of the timeframe anyway.So you are not talking about the HMS Hercules later named vikrant.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Zealandic_(1911)BTW, Hermes's 'twin' was a merchant ship altered to look like her. Great Britain did some of the same in WW1, creating a fleet of 'dreadnought look-alike's out of merchant ships.