For examples 1, 2 and 3, we are actually saying the vassals are stupid, not the enemy. The enemy can merrily annex vassals if they won't make peace with him.
Or it could also be the "I've played the game more than you, so I know how to avoid idiocy. If you don't want to understand, then there are not enough nice words to make you understand." -reaction.Galleblære said:This sounds to me like the time-tested infamous fan reaction "If you don't like it, don't play the game". Sigh.
Now, please tell me why the vassals are stupid in those examples? They are joining a winning war (not in example 1 of course, but that is the one example where nobody honestly can say the player is playing smart?). Joining a winning war, but a fact that the player can change for them....tombom said:For examples 1, 2 and 3, we are actually saying the vassals are stupid, not the enemy. The enemy can merrily annex vassals if they won't make peace with him.
Brownbeard said:so, to preserve Vukojebina, King Brownbeard must either: destroy the evil heathens attacking it, thus forcing him to create more border duchies that other evil heathens may attack...
Jarkko Suvinen said:Now, please tell me why the vassals are stupid in those examples? They are joining a winning war (not in example 1 of course, but that is the one example where nobody honestly can say the player is playing smart?). Joining a winning war, but a fact that the player can change for them....
Let us make a fourth example then.
Example 4. Pagan AI A DOW AI Kingdom B. Player C is a vassal of King B. Player C sees his liege winning the war, and decide to join the war. Moments later King B is perfectly happily mking peace for 1800d after taking 4 provinces. Player C now has to stop the revenging AI A from stampeding through the lands. According to the posts here Player C is stupid for not making peace with A (even though A probably don't accept any offers).
Johan said:In 1.05 your vassals will get peace with anyone you sign peace with.
Johan said:In 1.05 your vassals will get peace with anyone you sign peace with.
tombom said:There is something about this that tells me people will be complaining about this feature...
But I won't be. Sounds great!
tombom said:There is something about this that tells me people will be complaining about this feature...
But I won't be. Sounds great!
I don't like it either Pat. And I doubt very much we are the minority... It is just human nature that those who feel stongly against something are much louder than those who are satisfied with how things are.Patrucio said:I don't like it, but I'm not a whiner. I've stated my opinion on the matter repetedly, but I also recognize that my opinion is in the minority.
Now one thing is sure however, when 1.05 comes out, one element currently available in MP is not there anymore then
Galleblære said:Well, since your intellectial capacity is obviously on a nigh omnipotent level
I am not omnipotent. According to the MP games I've played in, Pat or Byakhiam are the omnipotent ones. I just try to ape after them.Stay in war untill all your vassals make peace?![]()
Basically yes. The two solutions I have learned after many SP and MP sessions are:Sty in war untill all your vassals make peace?
*Or* you can peace, and agree they take a province from your vassal. Or you can peace and say they can annex the vassal, but his daughter has to marry your son. Or you can make peace with him, let him annex your vassal when your ally is annexing another vassal of your enemy (so that you can annex one of your allys allies without your ally freaking out).cheech said:What element is that? I dont see the logic in kingdoms not being able to peace all round. True in MP you can tell your enemy to peace your vassals first i guess.
LOL! That is a cheap shot if any! If you did play MP you'd know I hate AI bashing. Of course if you are a chicken who don't have the guts to play against other people, then please do shoot your cheap shots, because that is probably the best you can doDinsdale said:So Jarko, as suspected, your position revolves around cheap conquest with the aid of others in MP.