Peace deal giving large bonus.

[HNT]

Georgia game (4.1b) and fighting GH and OE. With 3 successful sieges and 0% WS, I can get this peace deal with a bonus of 44% . That really surprises me. :wacko: However, GH is suffering from high RR due to -3 stab; incapable ruler and 9 WE. Does that mean that they want a peace deal "at all costs"? Cheers!

edit: GH has about 30 k troops, while I have 20 k, so they have no reason to fear me.

 

[Dafool]

It seems sort of buggy, but I guess something like that may be possible. The AI almost never takes anything that's more than 10% over the current WS(except when it's 100%). I'm not sure if being in a really bad predicament makes any big difference, but if anything would cause the AI to take an offer of that nature, I'd bet that's it.

 

[anomanderus]

I did a game with Georgia a while ago. I ended up saving right before I took the huge chance of declaring against the GH, since Muscovy and Novgorod were both my allies but since the ai is usually unfaithful I expected it to end badly. Then I ended up overrunning most of their unfortified provinces and instituting liberum veto, for the extra men. Also I took lots of danegeld from them. I ended up with a huge empire which, once cored, rivaled my former ally super-Muscovy, who I ended up dismantling in yet another risky war. It was glorious. Also I made the small village of Kamyshin into my glorious protected inland capital (Timurids survived and were a lucky nation, also they had cores on dagestan) I didn't want them occupying my capital. Also my settlement policy on Kamyshin would have worked eventually. It was glorious though.

 

[anomanderus]

It seems sort of buggy, but I guess something like that may be possible. The AI almost never takes anything that's more than 10% over the current WS(except when it's 100%). I'm not sure if being in a really bad predicament makes any big difference, but if anything would cause the AI to take an offer of that nature, I'd bet that's it.

In the Georgia game I just proudly described in semi-graphic detail the same thing happened. 44% captured, 70% worth of warscore gained in peace deals. GH is really vulnerable at the beginning. Same thing was happening with muscovy, offering several provinces at a time- but my goal wasn't to take their land, it was to break them so only I would rule in the east.

 

[HNT]

In the Georgia game I just proudly described in semi-graphic detail the same thing happened. 44% captured, 70% worth of warscore gained in peace deals. GH is really vulnerable at the beginning.

I did a game with Georgia a while ago. I ended up saving right before I took the huge chance of declaring against the GH, since Muscovy and Novgorod were both my allies but since the ai is usually unfaithful I expected it to end badly. Then I ended up overrunning most of their unfortified provinces and instituting liberum veto, for the extra men.

Sounds great! So you DOW'ed them in the early 1400 while they didn't have forts in all provinces? Were their 25-30 k armies focussing on your allies? Was it easy to control this large empire? Especially as the conversion chances were drastically reduced in the 4.1b patch. Cheers!

BTW: I also save before throwing myself in a tricky war. Georgia is imo not an easy nation as it's surrounded by the strong muslim guys GH, OE, Timmies and Mammies .

 

[I am.]

Sounds great! So you DOW'ed them in the early 1400 while didn't have forts in all provinces? Were their 25-30 k armies focussing on your allies? Was it easy to control this large empire? Especially as the conversion chances were drastically reduced in the 4.1b patch. Cheers!

BTW: I also save before throwing myself in a tricky war. Georgia is imo not an easy nation as it's surrounded by the strong muslim guys GH, OE, Timmies and Mammies .

Well, not quite the Mammies... they are in da hood, but do not surround them

 

[sprites]

had it happened once in two years ^^ and i could ask anything up to 75% , they'd accept