PATCH RELEASED (v1.03b)
- Thread starter Doomdark
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
I also have TKEO on my Steam version...
Edit: Sorry, wrote this before I read through the whole thread reinstalling fixed it.
Also:
"Fixed an issue with burgher heirs retaining burgher laws when inheriting a feudal demesne"
Awesome! I had that happen, and it was awful!
Last edited:
I'm beginning to agree. I'm so tired of trying to find a suitable marriage math for my children. IMPOSSIBLE.
Probably. Seems like any tactic or strategy that is useful is being nerfed.
Relax, you will probably not notice the change at all, since it was an edge case - this change only affects wars where the warscore was _below_ 20%.
marriage and finding new courtiers seems broken now. Its almost impossible to get courtiers that are idle at their foreign court through invites or matrilineage....
Ok, this is a small thing, but when I reinstalled (to get the correct checksum in my Steam version) it changed the CoA of my family in my savegame. I'm playing the D'Hautevilles, and it's now a red and white-checkered diagonal stripe on a blue field, where it used to be gold cups.
Does this mean my Dynasty CoA DLC didn't reinstall right? Can someone give me a description of some of the 'proper' CoAs in the DLC so I can check?
Does this mean my Dynasty CoA DLC didn't reinstall right? Can someone give me a description of some of the 'proper' CoAs in the DLC so I can check?
This happened to me as the hungarian arpads. But, unfortunately, I can't answer your question. I don't know if the CoAs are working or not working now.
The whiners started whining that this was a cheap tactic. Paradox merely answered their demands and there you have the result.
removing a fly from a fried's head with a hatchet is not really a good tactic
EDIT: Anyway, do Steam users HAVE to reinstall even though it updated? Yeah so my cheksum is TKEO, but so what? It's still 1.03b with all the right changes
Questions on Meaning of Change Notes
1. Does this affect it fighting to help an ally?
2. 10 Year Truces? Does this apply for the full term to wars/crusades etc. that fizzle out inconclusively or only to those with a normal result? (It doesn't seem unreasonably long for an aggressor who failed, but does for a winning defender who wants to take his turn back.)
3. Is this right? Matrilineal marriage requests are feasible only if (a) to a recipient within your own court, or (b) if the woman requesting matrilineal marriage is "important," meaning a women with the dynasty tag of the dynasty that is making the offer (women with any other dynasty tag no matter the rank don't count as important for this)?
4. Is the "Invite to Court" option going to improve to allow offering incentives such as land, titles, cash or marriage?
5. Does the new Invasion CB holding threshold mean my total holdings must be fewer than the total holdings existing in the de jure territory the CB is for (regardless of who holds them de facto)?
6. Should probably change this in the change notes to the less scary "Fixed a bug where AI with depleted levies could surrender at very low warscores" (i.e., 20% would be very low, while I would think 70% is low compared with 100% ).
Thanks for the prompt patch!
1. Does this affect it fighting to help an ally?
2. 10 Year Truces? Does this apply for the full term to wars/crusades etc. that fizzle out inconclusively or only to those with a normal result? (It doesn't seem unreasonably long for an aggressor who failed, but does for a winning defender who wants to take his turn back.)
3. Is this right? Matrilineal marriage requests are feasible only if (a) to a recipient within your own court, or (b) if the woman requesting matrilineal marriage is "important," meaning a women with the dynasty tag of the dynasty that is making the offer (women with any other dynasty tag no matter the rank don't count as important for this)?
4. Is the "Invite to Court" option going to improve to allow offering incentives such as land, titles, cash or marriage?
5. Does the new Invasion CB holding threshold mean my total holdings must be fewer than the total holdings existing in the de jure territory the CB is for (regardless of who holds them de facto)?
6. Should probably change this in the change notes to the less scary "Fixed a bug where AI with depleted levies could surrender at very low warscores" (i.e., 20% would be very low, while I would think 70% is low compared with 100% ).
Thanks for the prompt patch!
yeah there shold be more functional changes in the windows too. now, maybe I'm an idiot and I just didn't know, but it looks like on dynasty pages and trees, even after expanding to full screen, and even after full zoom in or out, you can't scroll.
You guys should at least make 'Invite to Court' a bit more likely to succeed. Give a boost to odds for anyone within your lands, or reduce the "No reason to move" penalty a bit. And show the red/green thumbs on the character search panel. Right now its a bit frustrating.
+1
We should be able at least to invite talented people who are unemployed in their country. Maybe promise them some money or title. Right now "invite to court" seems to be a useless button.