Well most of Iran is included on the map, so that's likely not going to happen. I would however, prefer the map included Khorasan(eastern Iran, aka all the "-istan" countries) as well as the Indus river.spl said:
Parthia I think would be in the game already as a Seleucid vassal by the Caspian sea. Not much to play with their, they'll likely get diplo-annexed by the Seleucids early on. :rofl:
TrulyOUTRAGOUS said:Well most of Iran is included on the map, so that's likely not going to happen. I would however, prefer the map included Khorasan(eastern Iran, aka all the "-istan" countries) as well as the Indus river.
comagoosie said:I do believe that Parthia will be the cavalry nation in this game, that is their purpose
Bingo!yourworstnightm said:
Nothing will stand between my Savaran and world conquest!
Oh man... the RTW representation was horrible. Not only were they not around at that time... and maybe if they were they were off the map... but all the lands they had were actually selecud lands!spl said:
Hehe, let's end our discussion on how badly represented everything is in R:TWGraf Zeppelin said:
(Oh, and I hope not, they always made me sleepy)
except they shall not fall, but one day rise above the rest and with the horizon looking down upon them, they shall set their sights to Rome. Without looking back they ride, creating a dust storm in their wake. Rome shudders at the thought.cool-toxic said:Parthia shall be Rome's true Byzantium!
The battles are much better in RTR... and concidering battles is the only thing the total war games will have over EU Rome... I don't see the point.Zlovie said:
