Re: About the WTO
I'd like to address Mr. Wellsford's remarks. I agree the Commission was both thorough and fair. It is a shining an example of what can happen when intelligent human beings can do if they come together to thoughtfully discuss the issues of the day.
Your right, Eutopian agriculture products would have open access to the European markets, where we may have a competitive advantage over domestic products, however, do you think we still have the absolute advantage on the world market? American methods and technologlies still surpass our own, and we are at a disadvantage when competing with their federally subsidized farmers. Not to mention, pragmatically speaking, Eutopia is not an agricultural nation. We are an industrialized nation, and our manufactured goods face severe disadvantages when competing with third world produced products.
As to "economic sovereignty", yes in a true capitalist enviroment there is no such thing. The market alone would dicatate everything, but no where on earth is there an example of pure, unregulated capitalism. Everyone here recognizes the need to regulate and at time control the market. Mr. Josephus and I would disagree vehemently as to how extensive these regulations and controls should be, but we both, as does everyone here, recognize the need for some government oversight. Joining the WTO would strip away a portion of that soveriegnty and allow decisions that affect Eutopians to be made by non Eutopians with interests that may conflict with our own.
Originally posted by Timothy
I wish to thank Mr. Langley for presenting the dissenting opinion of the commission to join the WTO. It indicates that joining the WTO is a subject studied in depth from multiple angles. For that I pay my respects to the commission.
But the reasons outlined by Langley not to join the WTO can be turned around to work in our favour too. To quote a favourite fictional character: "It's a poor man's nuclear blaster that doesn't point both ways." First, joining the WTO is a first step to see Eutopian agriculture produce sold on European markets. Surely all present can see the benefit of that. Second, if we can no longer embargo the French, so can the French, or any other European country, no longer embargo us.
Mr. Josephus, what is this 'economic sovereignty' you are talking about? Doesn't a free market economy indicate that we never had any 'economic sovereignty from the start?
- Timothy Wellesford
I'd like to address Mr. Wellsford's remarks. I agree the Commission was both thorough and fair. It is a shining an example of what can happen when intelligent human beings can do if they come together to thoughtfully discuss the issues of the day.
Your right, Eutopian agriculture products would have open access to the European markets, where we may have a competitive advantage over domestic products, however, do you think we still have the absolute advantage on the world market? American methods and technologlies still surpass our own, and we are at a disadvantage when competing with their federally subsidized farmers. Not to mention, pragmatically speaking, Eutopia is not an agricultural nation. We are an industrialized nation, and our manufactured goods face severe disadvantages when competing with third world produced products.
As to "economic sovereignty", yes in a true capitalist enviroment there is no such thing. The market alone would dicatate everything, but no where on earth is there an example of pure, unregulated capitalism. Everyone here recognizes the need to regulate and at time control the market. Mr. Josephus and I would disagree vehemently as to how extensive these regulations and controls should be, but we both, as does everyone here, recognize the need for some government oversight. Joining the WTO would strip away a portion of that soveriegnty and allow decisions that affect Eutopians to be made by non Eutopians with interests that may conflict with our own.