It's a touch ridiculous that the Anglo-Saxon dukes can just vote William and house de Normandy out of power and off the island. Im not a stickler for being railroaded and things have to follow history to the letter but geez.
- 2
- 1
Not really any testing to do seeing as how England is set to Agnatic-Cognatic Elective in 1066.Have you done enough tests to justify this? Cause i' ve not seen that in any of my games with the new patch. I may be lucky or you may just be unlucky.
Taking over the whole of England is very time consuming and not even William himself had to do that.Anglo-Saxons can't vote you out when you use your sweet invasion CB to unland all of them.
Anglo-Saxons can't vote you out when you use your sweet invasion CB to unland all of them.
If I wanted to play a game where I see countries where and as they should be, I play December 1066. No stressing William losing England, since he's already in power and everything's set up for him.
Will's AI, in the rare cases where he isn't killed fighting over Zeeland/wastes his time training troops in Paris/gets his war nullified by a Anglo-French alliance/loses to the oversized Norway doomstack, isn't bright enough to do that.
Invasion CB should impose the attacker's succession law on the target. While William didn't use Primo exactly (more like he had access to the Indian faith's heir choice feature IRL), he certainly didn't use Elective.
Taking over the whole of England is very time consuming and not even William himself had to do that.
William didnt also have to deal with a number of issues that are unique to this game. Like an Anglo-French alliance totally nullifying his war.Yes he did. He had to kill the incumbent king (Battle of Hastings), take London (Battle of Southwark), take everything surrounding London (Battle of Berkhamstead), then he crowned himself which may have made him king to the Pope and everyone else, but the Anglo-Saxons certainly weren't done fighting and had already crowned somebody else king, one Edgar Aetheling, so after he crowned himself, he had to conquer the Midlands and Welsh Borderlands, then he had to fight all the Anglo-Saxons in the north.
He was quite understandably pissed by having to do all that, so he genocided the Anglo-Saxons in the North, which was called the Harrowing of the North. Edgar fled to Scotland, so William invaded Scotland too, which we lost so we told Edgar to leave, which he did to the duchy of Flanders.
William was satisfied by that and finally sat down, accepted as King of England by everyone, including his Anglo-Saxon counterparts, by 1071.
Also he hadn't satellite vision for all his map, instant messaging system allowing him to make orders and get info to react instantly, teleports for his best war leaders and invulnerable navy.William didnt also have to deal with a number of issues that are unique to this game. Like an Anglo-French alliance totally nullifying his war.
All fine points except the last. Ship to ship combat wasnt really a thing and William's landing was unopposed anyway. Stopping a ship borne invasion was normally opposed on the beach.Also he hadn't satellite vision for all his map, instant messaging system allowing him to make orders and get info to react instantly, teleports for his best war leaders and invulnerable navy.
I'd say one cost another.
Not ship-to-ship combat but beach burnings. It was quite standard tactics to defeat invaders - go for their ships, for destroy their way home.Ship to ship combat wasnt really a thing and William's landing was unopposed anyway
And yeah, this is good point. It demands just one event after succefull invasion.The point is, is that it makes zero sense that the succession laws of the English crown dont flip from Agnatic-Cognatic Elective to Agnatic Primo when you successfully conquer England as William.