Signed, start with APD, add better navy, diplomatic conferences, and a new warscore sytem, and it would be perfect.
I would suggest a new system regarding warscore.
Every wargoal in a conflict will get it's own warscore.
Attacking Nation would be known as aggressor. Attacking Nations would only gain warscore if they accomplish the tasks for their wargoal(s).
Defending Nations would gain Warscore over time, if they are able to prevent the aggressor from succesfully completing wargoals.
Example: Prussia vs. Austria
Prussias wargoals: Take Saxony from SOI, Aquire Bohemia.
Now the prussians would need to fullfill certain tasks for gaining warscore. They would need to occupy Bohemia, and hold the state over a fixed time, thus gaining score for the "aquire Bohemia"
wargoal. If saxony is participating in the war, it would be needed to conquer saxony and hold them occupied, just like in the Bohemia wargoal. If Saxony would not be in the war, Prussia would need to gain a fixed score
to force Austria to release them. (By combat or naval blockade).
Austria, as defending nation, would gain Warscore every month they were able to prevent Prussia from accomplishing their wargoals.
By using this System of seperate wargoals it could be possible that Prussia may be able to occupy Saxony, and collecting the needed Warscore for that Wargoal, but Austria could
hold the prussian Advance back at the prussian-czech border, preventing them from gaining enough Score for the Aquire Bohemia Warscore.
This system would maybe solve the problem that wars with multiple wargoals are always ending in white peace, when the demanding nation was not able to reach the very high War Score needed to accomplish all their
goals.
Instead of seeking white peace, Prussia could consider itself satisfied with getting Saxony in their SOI. Additionally Austria would not need to start an all out offensive into prussian territory, just to settle the
war with white peace, because Austria could end the war by just holding it's borders and Saxony for maybe 2 years (?).
If there doing anything to warscore is do the holding capital thing....man its not realistic how im at war with austria (italy=ME) and i hold vienna and war scores like 5.....WTF! actually if you hold they capital u should win the war or atleast get more warscores
I'm with RedRalphwiggum. I want expanded diplomacy. I want a crisis mechanic with ultimatums and active consultation with allies ("No, France, we won't back you against the Ottomans, so quit demanding that they give up Syria." I want conferences that can redraw the map of Africa and Europe. And I want economic techs to reduce factory build times so that I don't have population growth exceeding factory expansion rates.![]()
Signed!
POLITICS, PLEASE
I would honestly be happy with an expansion that just added a political cabinet.
A warscore system like the one in CK2 would suffice imo. If you havent played CK2 it works like this an occupied province will accumulate warscore as time passes by so for example if the WS starts at 5 it could in a few months time be up to 10 or more.
I dotnknow if we need a cabinet system but at least Rulers with Dynastys and skills, not like CK more like EUIII.I know this won't happen but a cabinet system would be really great. even pride of nations had characters.
![]()
Please add HOI3 command system =)
I dotnknow if we need a cabinet system but at least Rulers with Dynastys and skills, not like CK more like EUIII.