Not to sound rude, but I do in fact know the context. But you figure that somebody would want to do something about it, instead of an exchange of victory cards. Hopefully (although obviously it's never this simple) people can put aside any past transgressions and put a stop to Bahmanid dominance.
I hope he'll come back for future dev multiplayer sessions even though he's on Stellaris now
Well, the Mamluks, Mughals and Bahmanis could easily march their armies over to Europe to fight in the British war against France, and they hardly suffered for that. Now, rather than a grand coalition against the Bahmanis or another one-sided beat-down against Italy and France it would be a lot more interesting and realistic to see two relatively balanced coalitions squaring off against each others in the final decades of the game. If only for our entertainment.
I don't really care who wins. Score in Eu4 means very little, and victory cards nothing at all. I'm far more interested in how well they play and how enjoyable their actions are to watch. Sure, they are playing for a trophy, but I'm not watching for one.
Smart, but boring and very gamy. They really should ban the voluntary exchanges of victory cards, since trading victory cards defeats the reason they added that feature to the game in the first place, which was to break up "hugboxes".
Perhaps I should have emphasized the word "fair" a bit more.
. Basically, all I'm wondering is if a single 100% deal can deal enough damage to bring down the Bahmani behemoth.
Perhaps I should have emphasized the word "fair" a bit more.
Does less than 50 years of irrecoverable devastation seriously trump hundreds of years worth of Bahmani build-up to you? To move on to a second nation is to take a step backwards, the other players had the advantage of more time and effort and Yonaz overcame that to an astounding degree.
He was effectively playing a "single player game" because the others were treating him as if he were. A result of European and African infighting, on one hand, and complacency among the other Asian players, on the other. This isn't Yonaz's fault, it's theirs. As of right now, everybody is too afraid of being backstabbed by their neighbours in order to deal with the biggest threat in the game. Trust is irrelevant in this situation, if they really want to put a stop to Bahmanis, they need to put aside their differences right this instant. They need to get over their situational problems and deal with it. From what I hear, such is the problem in any MP game.
). And I seriously can't think of a reason why this should disqualify Yonaz from a trophy, he's "earning" it as a result of everybody else letting him have it.
