Order of nobles

[SonofWinter]

Will the next patch finally put the order of vassals from lowest to highest? Will we have to continue dealing with constant rebellions, because we can't see who the most disloyal vassal is, because his dad died last week and we don't know that we have to (bribe)send him a gift to get him to the proper loyalty level?

I've stopped playing CK for the last 8 months, because none of the patches seem to mention this major fix. I'd like to pick up CK again, but I won't till I can play a game that allows me to deal with such problems. Maybe one of the patches has already addressed this issue, but if not, will the next one deal with it? Does anyone know?

 

[Gaute65]

Will the next patch finally put the order of vassals from lowest to highest? Will we have to continue dealing with constant rebellions, because we can't see who the most disloyal vassal is, because his dad died last week and we don't know that we have to (bribe)send him a gift to get him to the proper loyalty level?

I've stopped playing CK for the last 8 months, because none of the patches seem to mention this major fix. I'd like to pick up CK again, but I won't till I can play a game that allows me to deal with such problems. Maybe one of the patches has already addressed this issue, but if not, will the next one deal with it? Does anyone know?

Is already adressed.

There is only one problem, if you have more than 250 vassals, you will only see one shield.

Edit: It was changed in the april beta 2005

 

[Alexandre]

Is already adressed.

There is only one problem, if you have more than 250 vassals, you will only see one shield.

Edit: It was changed in the april beta 2005

Actually, no. The vassals are listed from highest to lowest loyalty. If the order was switched, it wouldn't matter if one could only see one shield -- it would be the vassal who is most likely to revolt.

Alexandre

 

[unmerged(21937)]

Having so many vassals that they coascele into a single one isn't the standard situation in most CK games, I believe, though.

 

[Veldmaarschalk]

If you have 250+ vassals, it isn't really a big deal when one breaks away.

So alltough, it would be easier if the most unloyal was the first, it is hardly a major issue in my opinion.

 

[Duuk]

If you have 250+ vassals, you should be fighting a massive civil war constantly anyway, so what would it matter?

 

[SonofWinter]

If you have 250+ vassals, you should be fighting a massive civil war constantly anyway, so what would it matter?

That is your opinion. I don't share it and neither do a lot of people. Don't respond, because I've talked to many folks who do like WC without the Civil War events.

The only request has been that the most disloyal be first, so if I do have 250+ vassals, I will be able to see the most disloyal first rather than last. I understand that not everyone likes to play World Conquest games but I do. So I guess the question is, will this be addressed in the newest patch or will I be unable to play this game, ever? This has been requested time and time again, why can't the staff simply reverse this? This is not a game breaker, it is the simplest of all requests.

 

[SonofWinter]

So, any response? Will this be changed? Does anyone know?

 

[unmerged(21937)]

We can ask Johan after 1.5 is out, before that, no.