I was reading the CK3 forum because was thinking of buying it and haven't played it in ages, and found this post https://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum/threads/what-are-old-ck2-veterans-opinion-of-ck3.1466094 It's very interesting but as a side note read that they had to wait 10 years to get a fully mature game... Well that's a lot, and I would suppose, based on the current EU4 development pace, we would need 15 years to get that.
Reason why is how abandoned some piece in the game get... For example, I wrote a post about Ming missions, but that's nothing compared to Aztecs. And the weird thing is I do have the El Dorado DLC, but it doesn't matter, I don't have custom missions for Aztecs.
So believe it's time for PDX to get more innovative in their business model, besides the horrendous subscription which is not at all innovative BTW. And that step is making some pieces open source, like missions, events and so on. Those changes would be released as part of the free content PDX always releases. Also devs could focus on actual features, and not just click and win buttons.
Reason why is how abandoned some piece in the game get... For example, I wrote a post about Ming missions, but that's nothing compared to Aztecs. And the weird thing is I do have the El Dorado DLC, but it doesn't matter, I don't have custom missions for Aztecs.
So believe it's time for PDX to get more innovative in their business model, besides the horrendous subscription which is not at all innovative BTW. And that step is making some pieces open source, like missions, events and so on. Those changes would be released as part of the free content PDX always releases. Also devs could focus on actual features, and not just click and win buttons.
- 4