Colonel Warden said:Why will a thousand new bugs be better than a thousand old ones? Better the devil you know, than the devil you don't...
Andrew
This is true wisdom. Especially since we are on the 'receiving end'!
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
This is true wisdom. Especially since we are on the 'receiving end'!
I don´t even consider Armageddon with fully working features that cheap. The price is 1/5 the price of HoI2 DD. It definietly not have 20% the scope of new added features to the game.
Who else is going to find the bugs! We try things! Unusual things -- some more than others ... :wacko:
Danielos said:
This is true. Though to be fair, they rather undercharged for the original in the first place...
Acheron said:
DAIM fixes the nat. china leader bug. I'm not sure why paradox hasn't bothered to incorperate their idea, all it does is add another couple events to the surrender chain.
I don't like it either, but to say that it's completely unplayable is an exaggeration. I've had a really interesting game playing as Canada with Armageddon. I've seen a lot worse bugs in a game than this. I don't understand why it would be unplayable :wacko:
Alexus said:
why? I've been having a lot of naval wars and I don't really notice that it's messed up. It seems pretty much like it used to.
Alexus said:
Not quite impossible, just infuriating...
...and occasionally game-breaking...
...okay, you're right. Pretty much impossible, if you're doing more than trying to protect your Transports.
MagisterMundi said:Not quite impossible, just infuriating...
...and occasionally game-breaking...
...okay, you're right. Pretty much impossible, if you're doing more than trying to protect your Transports.
Why is it broken? what am I missing? I haven't noticed anything :wacko: Am I blind or something?
dagas said:
Nah, I think you've just been lucky - you haven't seen a carrier with a range of 1,233,465,345,324,244,654+ km show up in your game. I have.
What's odd is that there seems to be few patterns in when and why odd ranges like that show up... they do for some, and don't for others.
MagisterMundi said:Nah, I think you've just been lucky - you haven't seen a carrier with a range of 1,233,465,345,324,244,654+ km show up in your game. I have.
What's odd is that there seems to be few patterns in when and why odd ranges like that show up... they do for some, and don't for others.
LOL no I haven't seen that
but then I've only build BB,CA,CL and DD so far. My Carriers are being built now so maybe they will have that bug the AI has unlimited range already so I guess it doesn't matter to them.
dagas said:LOL no I haven't seen that
I meant combat range, not how far it can travel. Which means that their carriers can hit you from an entire galaxy away. You'll never get into firing range.
Or, alternatively, your ship will have this... talent, and your single Light Cruiser (as it happened for another poster) will be able to single-handedly sink every navy in the world. And a few worlds over, for that matter. Hell, a few galaxies over...
MagisterMundi said:I meant combat range, not how far it can travel. Which means that their carriers can hit you from an entire galaxy away. You'll never get into firing range.
okey...then I understand what you mean by broken. :rofl: That IS a sever bug
Ok Ok, here is the not so subtle 'official word from Paradox'
Paradox is looking for a 'new' programmer
Paradox is looking for a 'new' programmer
MagisterMundi said:
for me this bug happened everytime in connection with an attachment upgrade. as long as the attachments are the original level they were build, everything is ok. but after upgrading, the range/attack... values are higher than they should.
but i have no interest in spending more time for testing hardcoded "features" as long the people who are able (at least i hope so) to fix it, are not interested in someone's observations and give no reply at all. i don't need them, they don't need me, but maybe they will need some customers in the future.
I personally think there should be more effort to incorporate some of the events and extras that have been developed by the community. It is almost like they are starting from scratch with every release, with no thought to taking advantage of work that has already been done.
What makes HOI2 great is the '36 scenario - specifically all the events. A and Abyss as they are now are completely useless other than a one quick game to realize the AI is completely useless - the same with the '45 doomsday - they are just one dimensional, mostly eventless scenarios. They are fun to play - once... maybe more if I want to switch around the countries - but that is it. The '36 scenario? I have played most med/major countries and have had a hoot every time.
For HOI3, they should build on HOI2 - not start from scratch... my 2 cents...
What makes HOI2 great is the '36 scenario - specifically all the events. A and Abyss as they are now are completely useless other than a one quick game to realize the AI is completely useless - the same with the '45 doomsday - they are just one dimensional, mostly eventless scenarios. They are fun to play - once... maybe more if I want to switch around the countries - but that is it. The '36 scenario? I have played most med/major countries and have had a hoot every time.
For HOI3, they should build on HOI2 - not start from scratch... my 2 cents...
Think there's any connection between the job posting that has gone up, the dismal state of Armageddon and the desperate need for a new patch?
Jones944 said:Think there's any connection between the job posting that has gone up, the dismal state of Armageddon and the desperate need for a new patch?
Possibly... being under-staffed certainly does suck...