Neither here. I searched for the keywords "infantry" "mechanised" "motorised" and "upgrade" through the whole document, couldn't find anything about that.
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Neither here. I searched for the keywords "infantry" "mechanised" "motorised" and "upgrade" through the whole document, couldn't find anything about that.
On page 12 of the manual, it shows the top bar with all of the country info. I can figure out what all of them are except one. What is the national unt symbol meant to be? As I know discent is a flame but unity looks like a bra to me, D cup at that too. I'm guessing that I am wrong, or is national unity represented by the ratio of buxom women in your country?
Just curious as it's bugging me.
Just curious as it's bugging me.
Of course it is Welch! Why do you think Sweden has such excellent internal politics?
I think it's suppose to represent multiple ideologies (each of those circles being one), like bringing different people together. It's hard to tell in black and white.
Upgrading of unit types is something you'll need to lobby for in an upcoming patch or expansion.
Encirclement is a double-edged sword. It may benefit you, or it may not, depending on who owns the balance (the majority) of divisions in the battle. Someone can actually get in alot of trouble if it happens, but that's part of the unpredictability of war!
I think the idea was to have converging circles -- three "polities" (voting blocs, perhaps) coming together at the center.
I believe it is a Venn diagram, with each of the circles representing one of the major factions (liberal in blue, communist in red, fascist in grey or black).
You don't want massive amounts of IC to build more SH Battleships, Heavy tanks and Strategic bombers?!!! What's wrong with you?
Hm, though I dont care much about the balance of it - this will be easily moddable - I noticed the distinct lack of the use of the word "resource" in the manual. It mentioned manpower, IC and RR. Are we sure that occupation policy affects the amount of resources extracted, and if so, whats the source?
Im asking because this was an annoying hardcoded part in Hoi2. You could tweak how much IC youd get from occupied land, but never how much oil, energy, rares, etc. It was all hardcoded and it annoyed me immensely.
Since we know that occupation policies are in plain text files, learning that they can affect the amounts of resources extracted from occupied provs would be awesome news!
by far the coolest thing--when your units fight in combat, you get tech increases.
Finally, the whole "doctrine of x" stuff actually makes sense...
Finally, the whole "doctrine of x" stuff actually makes sense...
There's also the effect of combat width. Using 10 1 brigade units you'd only be able to get 10 brigades into combat, while 3 * 4 width divisions, or 4 * 3 width divisions let you put 12 brigades into combat.
Does this mean that we can play as Ethiopia and continue playing even NU collapses?
UK make peace, all Allied GIEs go to USSR
Not all that odd. De Gaulle flirted with the idea of relocating the Free French to Moscow at one point. I wrote a paper about the French Resistance a few years ago; I don't remember the exact circumstances, but I think it had something to do with strained relations with the UK and the desire to keep the Communist resistance in line.
Yeah. Basically, think of it as the more leftist GIE members making their peace with the Soviets and working with the communists just to keep the resistance alive, while the more rightest ones flee or resettle. Think of the Polish resistance: if the UK had been forced to sign a peace with Germany, I can certainly see some of them fleeing to Moscow and linking up the Home Army and whatever GIE resources remained with the tiny communist resistance, and working more closely with Stalin. A devil's bargain, but one that many might feel necessary.Garak said:
Nukes & Rockets? Capital licenses?
Sorry if this has already been asked, but.....
According to P2.1, Rocket test platforms are prerequisite for producing rocket units. That would be a change from HOI2.
Accoding to P3.1, I can build as many reactors as I want (with a limit of 10 for each). Does that mean....10 provinces with 10 reactors each = weekly A-Bomb deliveries?
Best regards,
Roland
PS: Why can't I purchase licences for capital ships? Kongo was build in the UK, the remaining 3 ships of her class were copies build in Japan.
Sorry if this has already been asked, but.....
According to P2.1, Rocket test platforms are prerequisite for producing rocket units. That would be a change from HOI2.
Accoding to P3.1, I can build as many reactors as I want (with a limit of 10 for each). Does that mean....10 provinces with 10 reactors each = weekly A-Bomb deliveries?
Best regards,
Roland
PS: Why can't I purchase licences for capital ships? Kongo was build in the UK, the remaining 3 ships of her class were copies build in Japan.
I observed that one Jacob Michael Lundgren is credited as a beta tester. My jealosy compels me to hunt and/or lynch you in every single WW game we play from now on.
Btw, I read that divisions with many support elements will be harder to coordinate in combat (sorry, can't remember the page...). So does that mean they get some kind of combat penalty like losing more ORG or breaking earlier?
As Baneslave says, there's a stacking penalty per brigade.
But the mix of combat vs. support brigades also has to be carefully balanced, because if too much of your combat strength is behind the front lines, then you don't have alot of buffer against the enemy plowing through you (even if you're scoring MASSIVE damage on them because of your 4 artillery brigades!).