[Okay, so I was wrong. I've had some health troubles, but now I can get back at this.]
Mary I the Bloody
Born: 18 February 1519, Reading
Married: Felipe Babenburg (on 25 July 1554)
Died: 17 November 1558, London
Titles: (claimed but unrecognised in brackets)
Queen of England, Wales, Scotland, Ireland [and France]
Queen Consort of Castilla, Leon, and Trinacria
Lady of the Scottish [and Greek] Isles
Duchess of Buckingham, Holland and Friesland, Flanders, Cornwall, [Iceland and Bretagne]
Duchess Consort of Catalonia and Valencia
Countess of Stafford and Guines
"Christians above all men are forbidden to correct the stumblings of sinners by force...it is necessary to make a man better not by force but by persuasion. We neither have authority granted us by law to restrain sinners, nor, if it were, should we know how to use it, since God gives the crown to those who are kept from evil, not by force, but by choice."
--St. Ioannes Chrysostomos
Henry dreaded his death all the more knowing who would legally succeed him. His eldest daughter, Mary, was the daugter of Catherine of Aragon and thus was brought up quite Catholic. To make her position worse in Henry's eyes, she was technically illegitimate, since Cranmer had annuled the marriage which produced her; this put her out of the line of succession, and caused her to oppose the Reformation even more. Henry thought little of this, especially while his son Edward was still alive; but upon the prince's death in 1542, Henry was in trouble.
He had no more wish for the younger daughter, Elisabeth, to succeed, as she was technically illegitimate as well. Unfortunately, there was nobody left (except for other children who had never been legitimate in the first place); so Henry finally relented, and in 1543 added them into the succession (but did not legitimise them). Elisabeth, both publicly and privately, praised her sister for having the chance to come to the throne, and held no grudge against her then or later for being the elder of the two.
Upon Henry's death and her succession, Mary did exactly what Henry had feared: she had the Act of Supremacy and all the related acts removed, and restored England to Papal control. Much as Henry's reforms had changed things but not been a complete breaking point, Mary still retained much of the clergy and religious institutions that Henry had put in place. Only that which was specifically against Catholic doctrine (such as a vernacular Mass) was changed.
Unlike the traditional image of a mass inquisition to deal with heretics, Mary was far too politically astute to begin persecutions. Instead, she showed clemency to anyone who did not rebel against her rule, even if they were Protestant. That did not prevent some of the more radical groups from rebelling anyway, however, as we shall see shortly.
Mary came to the throne concerned about her succession as well. She didn't consider Elisabeth as a bad person to have succeed her - at least if she could be brought around to Catholicism - but she preferred to have an heir of her own. Her disgraced situation made it difficult to find a husband before coming to the throne; now, however, a potential match quickly showed himself.
This match was Felipe, the Prince of Asturias (heir to the Spanish throne), King of Sicily, and Mary's cousin. In early 1554, his first wife, Giulia Lucinetta, the heiress to Sicily, died, leaving a son Carlos. Felipe's father, Carlos II, was also on the lookout for a political alliance, and a newly-Catholic England was a perfect place for it. In July of that year, the two were married, and Felipe made King Philip of England.
King Philip of Spain, Sicily, England, etc., by Alonso Coello (late 16th c.)
Mary's carefully crafted political system broke to pieces with that news. The idea of coming under the influence of the rising Spanish star was not something which the English considered a good thing, and trouble began to ferment. Mary made things worse later that year with the treaty of Ypres, an agreement with France that gave the port of Calais in exchange for the remainder of the French Duchy of Flanders. It was a reasonable trade, but a practical statement that English designs on France were completely gone, something many were not willing to take.
The troubled sentiment broke in late 1555. A group of radical Protestants, led by John Dudley, Duke of Northumberland, put forward a petition to Mary, demanding that she take an oath stating (among other things) that the Pope was the "Antichrist" and asking for either conversion or abdication. Mary could not accept such a thing, and in December, Northumberland put forward another candidate for the throne: Jane Grey, who through a rather convoluted lineage had a claim to the various thrones connected with England. She was hastily married to Norfolk's son, Guilford Dudley, and an army of northern lords was raised.
Lady Jane Grey, by Willem and Magdalena van de Passe (1620).
The English army was organised, and was put under the command of yet another Duke of Norfolk (Thomas Howard, the fourth Howard to hold that title). In early 1556 they marched north, learning of a revolt against Mary, the Duchess of Lothian. Mary herself was both far too young and (for the time) too female to try and retake Edinburgh, so part of the army had to be dispatched there to meet up with the Earl of Arran.
Arran's army was the first to fight his opponent, facing the rebels in front of Edinburgh on 12 January 1556. It was rather quick, as the Scots who had rebelled were poorly equipped and had little popular support (most Scots at this time were still Catholic); Arran marched into Ediburgh and had several prominent Protestants executed. Among those killed was the man who would be regarded as the first of the "martyrs" of Mary's reign, the theologian John Knox, often called the "founder of the Church of Scotland". Mary expressed dismay at Arran for this rather unnecessary act, but there was little she could do about it after the fact.
Norfolk's army attacked Northumberland on 16 February, not far south of Carlisle. The rebels were vastly outnumbered, and many did not share the fanaticism of their leaders; Northumberland and Grey were captured, tried for rebellion, and executed in August. This got the point across, and there was only one more rebellion for the remainder of Mary's reign, a short rebellion by Irish nobles, who were themselves Catholic.
That last point shows us how little religion was actually a factor with Mary's various actions. While she insisted upon her own Catholicism, there simply isn't any evidence for the mass execution of Protestants which gave her her nickname of "Bloody Mary", aside from later propaganda pieces such as
Foxe's Book of Martyrs. The vagueness with which he treats the vast majority of the martyrdoms makes it quite probable that those executed were killed for other reasons, and only happened to be Protestant. In fact, the only area where he goes into any detail at all is with Edinburgh, and even there has to strain in order to make Mary complicit in the act.
John Foxe, author of Foxe's Book,
by George Glover (1641).
By October of 1556, Philip was forced to return to Spain to rule that country, and Mary had still not given birth to a child with him. In fact, she would never do so, and resigned to the fact that Elisabeth would inherit. Earlier, she would have agreed to this, but Elisabeth had stated herself as being more and more Protestant. In this, she had fallen under the influence of her quite Lutheran mother-in-law, Salome. Mary attempted to get her out of the way by contracting a marriage with Nikita Romanovich Zakharyin, the brother in law of Russian Tsar Ivan IV, on 11 August 1557. It is generally agreed that this marriage was never consummated, however, and Elisabeth spent a minimum of time in Russia before returning.
The cause of this return was the death of Mary. She grew increasingly worried about the lack of an heir, and suffered twice from false pregnancies. The last one proved to be something very different from a pregnancy: cancer. Her death in November of 1558 left England in turmoil once again, with Elisabeth inheriting a nation on the brink of internal conflict.