I'm building excel spreadsheets with the different unit types and their values. I've noticed some numbers seem to be out of whack. Has this been brought up and I missed it in the archives?
Example (Reserve Infantry):
Unitname cst time MP spd org mor def tou sft sup Adef SA HA AA trans sup fuel time cost
1935(6) 6.3 90 8.7 3 20 20 12 5 100 1 3 7 0 1 10 1.2 0 2 0.05
1938(6) 9.2 90 9.4 3 20 20 14.5 8 100 1 3 15 2 1 10 1.2 0 2 0.05
1941(6) 9.8 90 9.4 3 20 20 17 8.5 100 1 3 10 4 1 15 1.2 0 2 0.05
Notice the jump from 1935 SA 7 to 1938 SA 15 then back to 1941 SA 10. Is this what is supposed to be there? I've noticed a few others but I'm going to see if it's by design.
I also noticed the Heavy Medium Armour, Era 1 numbers: 1936 division has SA/HA of 1/13 while the 1938 has 8/6. Is that what is wanted? Why the strange jump within the same era and type of unit?
Please don't take this as a knock on the hard work done by the team. Hopefully this post will either a) fix an issue or b) let others know it is the way it's supposed to be.
Thanks for the great mod. I appreciate the work done by all.
Example (Reserve Infantry):
Unitname cst time MP spd org mor def tou sft sup Adef SA HA AA trans sup fuel time cost
1935(6) 6.3 90 8.7 3 20 20 12 5 100 1 3 7 0 1 10 1.2 0 2 0.05
1938(6) 9.2 90 9.4 3 20 20 14.5 8 100 1 3 15 2 1 10 1.2 0 2 0.05
1941(6) 9.8 90 9.4 3 20 20 17 8.5 100 1 3 10 4 1 15 1.2 0 2 0.05
Notice the jump from 1935 SA 7 to 1938 SA 15 then back to 1941 SA 10. Is this what is supposed to be there? I've noticed a few others but I'm going to see if it's by design.
I also noticed the Heavy Medium Armour, Era 1 numbers: 1936 division has SA/HA of 1/13 while the 1938 has 8/6. Is that what is wanted? Why the strange jump within the same era and type of unit?
Please don't take this as a knock on the hard work done by the team. Hopefully this post will either a) fix an issue or b) let others know it is the way it's supposed to be.
Thanks for the great mod. I appreciate the work done by all.
