Norway seemed abit fishy in CK, The capitol was placed in Oslo, Bergen was a bishopry and Trondheim was a duchy.
After a quick look on wikipedia and other places, i think this would be more correct:
Trondheim was considered Norways capitol until 1217, when Bergen took over as the main city.
King Harald did extend Oslo after taking the region from the daneking, but did not as far as i can see consider it the capitol.
When Harald went to England, he made his son Magnus II regent. His other son, Magnus's brother Olaf was traveling with Harald, and returned to Norway in 1067.
The best solution would be to make Trondheim and eastern Norway, a personal demesne of the king. With Trondheim/Nidaros the capitol
Bergen is more tricky. I see no proof of a bishopry in 1066 but i dont see a county/duchy either. Inputs are welcome
If regents are in the game, Magnus II should be regent. Olaf and magnus did share the crown, but that was later, in 1067.
After a quick look on wikipedia and other places, i think this would be more correct:
Trondheim was considered Norways capitol until 1217, when Bergen took over as the main city.
King Harald did extend Oslo after taking the region from the daneking, but did not as far as i can see consider it the capitol.
When Harald went to England, he made his son Magnus II regent. His other son, Magnus's brother Olaf was traveling with Harald, and returned to Norway in 1067.
The best solution would be to make Trondheim and eastern Norway, a personal demesne of the king. With Trondheim/Nidaros the capitol
Bergen is more tricky. I see no proof of a bishopry in 1066 but i dont see a county/duchy either. Inputs are welcome
If regents are in the game, Magnus II should be regent. Olaf and magnus did share the crown, but that was later, in 1067.