You are treating it as something it isn't. You are claiming it is alternate history but alternate history is something else. The point of alternate history is to ask oneself questions, if that one thing happened or didn't happen, what could have unfolded and so on. It's an intellectual exercise, like a mathematical equation in which you change some values and then look at how the result changed. Alternate history is first and foremost about history, because you need to know history very well in order to build a plausible timeline, and so it is also a way to learn and better understand history. What you have done is nothing like that, because you actually don't care about history at all. What you have is a bland, nonsensical fantasy with kindergarden-level understanding of pretty much every topic from geopolitics to internal politics to national identity to geography to warfare. And you don't even try to improve it even when people actually come and try to give you some knowledge(I personnally didn't, but several others tried). This is not alternate history. When you call it alternate history it is an insult to alternate history and it is an insult to history.
