To be honest, with Conclave you can practically enact any law at your whim.
"No vassal count or above has a negative opinion of you"
- Thread starter Major Malfunction
- Start date
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
With Conclave you can declare war and revoke titles from anyone, but endure "tyranny" penalty. The best example of soft cap implemented well. You can declare war or imprison people, but suffer the consequences. Game warned you about it but not prevented from doing it.
I have to agree with this request. It can be needlessly frustrating. I would take a tyranny hit to be able to change to a more stable government any day.
I don't think laws of succession shouldn’t be possible to change like other laws as they only apply occasionally, and it’s when the ruler’s dead.
I think one should usually start with succession laws in a normal CK2 state, but changing it should be a troublesome process. If one wants a new heir, you should proclaim one and demand your vassals swear allegiance to him. In the law screen, this would create some sort of “disputed succession” thing where (at least) two different succession laws were indicated as being arguably valid. The prior heir, who would be very likely to be pissed the liege has snubbed him, has a strong chance of forming a faction to be launched upon the liege's death (or less likely, to rebel to be named heir, or still less likely, to replace the king himself) where he would be made ruler rather than the liege’s chosen heir. Note that other people might form the faction and then try to invite their chosen person in, who’d usually though not always be the prior heir.
I think one should usually start with succession laws in a normal CK2 state, but changing it should be a troublesome process. If one wants a new heir, you should proclaim one and demand your vassals swear allegiance to him. In the law screen, this would create some sort of “disputed succession” thing where (at least) two different succession laws were indicated as being arguably valid. The prior heir, who would be very likely to be pissed the liege has snubbed him, has a strong chance of forming a faction to be launched upon the liege's death (or less likely, to rebel to be named heir, or still less likely, to replace the king himself) where he would be made ruler rather than the liege’s chosen heir. Note that other people might form the faction and then try to invite their chosen person in, who’d usually though not always be the prior heir.