The English claims wereweak. If it was based on female succession the true heiress was Joanna doaughter of Louis X. However, after her posthomous brother John I died her uncles Philip V and Charles IV seized both France and Navarre. She at least got Navarre back when Charles IV died because the Valois had no claim to it. The rationalization for disinheriting her was the adultery of her mother, but there does not seem to have been any real doubts about her paternity. Her son Charles II the Bad dis half heartedly make some claims, but Navarre was too weak to do anything on its own.
It gets even worse with Henry V. Once again, if the claim comes from female descent the English claimant should have been Edmund Earl of March (the rightful and disinherited king of England to begin with) and then his sister Anne the mother of the Yorkist claimant.
But then there are a lot f such claimants in history. Alfred the Great took the throne over his brother Aethelred's sons (the excuse was that an adult was needed), yet after his death Alfred's Edward took the throne, In Scotland the true heirs should have been the sons of Malcolm III from his first marriage. But after Edgar I got the throne with English help they fade away from history.