-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Re: Vassalization
I think your country also has to be bigger than the one you are trying to vassalize. Can someone else confirm or deny this?
I think your country also has to be bigger than the one you are trying to vassalize. Can someone else confirm or deny this?
And I noticed that this factor starts from 3. So after 30 years this factor is 0. I'm right?
Bigger?
hi,
And how bigger? I mean I've got the problem playing Astrakhan and trying to vassalise the golden horde. I own 7 territories and they own 4 and it's not enought... So is it a question of ratio or what? I need to be twice bigger and I should go for an extra territory?
TIA
hi,
And how bigger? I mean I've got the problem playing Astrakhan and trying to vassalise the golden horde. I own 7 territories and they own 4 and it's not enought... So is it a question of ratio or what? I need to be twice bigger and I should go for an extra territory?
TIA
Re: Re: Re: Vassalization
Is this based strictly on number of provinces? And can my Orthodox nation vassalize a Catholic nation if I meet all the criteria?
Is this based strictly on number of provinces? And can my Orthodox nation vassalize a Catholic nation if I meet all the criteria?
I bought the game almost two weeks ago and have been playing almost non-stop ever since (4-14 hrs a day, every day). Great game !!!
However, I'd like to comment on item 25 on the bug list, i.e. the lifespan of random leaders in British version 1.07c: I have received random explorers/conquistadors four times while playing either Sweden or Prussia in Grand Campaign(s).and each and every time the said specialist has died within a month of his arrival!!! Usually they couldn't even leave the port before dropping dead. So they are far from being immortal, the buggers seem to be keen on quitting the world as soon as possible. If this had happened only once I would have chalked it up on bad luck, but four times...there's got to be something wrong.
But on the whole it's an excellent, excellent game.. just be sure to fix this bug in the 1.08 patch.
Cheers,
H.
However, I'd like to comment on item 25 on the bug list, i.e. the lifespan of random leaders in British version 1.07c: I have received random explorers/conquistadors four times while playing either Sweden or Prussia in Grand Campaign(s).and each and every time the said specialist has died within a month of his arrival!!! Usually they couldn't even leave the port before dropping dead. So they are far from being immortal, the buggers seem to be keen on quitting the world as soon as possible. If this had happened only once I would have chalked it up on bad luck, but four times...there's got to be something wrong.
But on the whole it's an excellent, excellent game.. just be sure to fix this bug in the 1.08 patch.
Cheers,
H.
And how bigger?
As I understood it, you need at least 1 more province to even be able to annex another country diplomatically. However there are a lot of other things working toghether to create the final % chance. Paradox is silent, but for certain, relative military & stability strenght as well as a monarch good in DIP playes major roles in it.
As I understood it, you need at least 1 more province to even be able to annex another country diplomatically. However there are a lot of other things working toghether to create the final % chance. Paradox is silent, but for certain, relative military & stability strenght as well as a monarch good in DIP playes major roles in it.
Originally posted by Griffon
you sure you're not from Transylvania???
Now let's not go off on a 'Rocky Horror' tangent here!
Bug #31 Not Observed, Rebels Lose
I have not found the mentioned problem while running the US version of the product.
I am playing Hard/Agressive settings as England. While experience some domestic religous problems rebellions have begun with my army present. In all cases I recall the rebels were defeated.
I have not found the mentioned problem while running the US version of the product.
I am playing Hard/Agressive settings as England. While experience some domestic religous problems rebellions have begun with my army present. In all cases I recall the rebels were defeated.
Siege bug
New and extremely bad siege bug (I'm surprised I haven't noticed this before).
Each time an assault is beaten back, a siege roll occurs afterward (i.e., the cannon fires). This can be exploited for the old blitzkrieg effect - basically you can declare an assault, break it off (siege roll), declare an assault, break it off (siege roll), etc., etc.
End result: In 30 days you can have an equivalent number of siege rolls comparable to the number in a siege lasting 10-15 months. Even if the siege rolls are not so effective (due to the short siege period), this can easily be used to blast through most fortresses in 1-2 months provided you have cannons enough.
This should be fixed.
A quick and dirty fix (but probably effective) would be to reduce the siege roll immediately after a siege, so that this form of cheating has little effect.
New and extremely bad siege bug (I'm surprised I haven't noticed this before).
Each time an assault is beaten back, a siege roll occurs afterward (i.e., the cannon fires). This can be exploited for the old blitzkrieg effect - basically you can declare an assault, break it off (siege roll), declare an assault, break it off (siege roll), etc., etc.
End result: In 30 days you can have an equivalent number of siege rolls comparable to the number in a siege lasting 10-15 months. Even if the siege rolls are not so effective (due to the short siege period), this can easily be used to blast through most fortresses in 1-2 months provided you have cannons enough.
This should be fixed.
A quick and dirty fix (but probably effective) would be to reduce the siege roll immediately after a siege, so that this form of cheating has little effect.
And I thought I was suggesting a quick and dirty fix.
Not sure if I like the idea of not being able to call of an assault. The combat algorithm is too damn random for my taste - and after all, there can be perfectly valid reasons why one would want to call of an attack. Hmm.
Well, I guess its better than no fix.
Not sure if I like the idea of not being able to call of an assault. The combat algorithm is too damn random for my taste - and after all, there can be perfectly valid reasons why one would want to call of an attack. Hmm.
Well, I guess its better than no fix.
Originally posted by Tim
I guess it is time to start a new discussion for 1.09.
Not yet, but soon enough...
Hartmann