-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
Fredrik82 said:Austria getting half of Germany in one blow like that would hardly be any fair.
I'm actually getting more and more convinced that we dont need a Austria in this game. If the German minors get Austrian leaders and also perhaps cores it's the same really. But the two latter is a must if it is to work.
Hungary might become a problem in that case, if not Poland is given the necessary cultures to make it a bit more worth to bother fighting over that is
But the best solution would be to get a new perm for Austria, of course.
And still have the current nation setup in the game.
Nope it won't be fair; you're forgetting the poor palatinat's position..
Last edited:
first of all im incredibly against losing austria. FAL has informed me though that we wont be dropping them which is good. We now need a new player but that isn’t really uncommon.
Now I am actually quite enjoying England so would prefer someone else to take them. This may however be difficult to find a skilled player due to obvious reasons. England would perhaps be much easier given they have 3k in the bank and low inflation (with inflation event coming up).
Ill speak to various players over ICQ to see if the diplomatic situation for Austria. They could be a very fun challenge in many ways.
As for rehosting I havnt found it that bad really. Stability has actually been rather good given the number of players. The game itself has been excellent apart from the Austria mad man.
Sorry but just HAVE to say ….
I TOLD YOU SO!
Now I am actually quite enjoying England so would prefer someone else to take them. This may however be difficult to find a skilled player due to obvious reasons. England would perhaps be much easier given they have 3k in the bank and low inflation (with inflation event coming up).
Ill speak to various players over ICQ to see if the diplomatic situation for Austria. They could be a very fun challenge in many ways.
As for rehosting I havnt found it that bad really. Stability has actually been rather good given the number of players. The game itself has been excellent apart from the Austria mad man.
Sorry but just HAVE to say ….
I TOLD YOU SO!
I myself has had a lot of fun so far, and rehosting wouldn't have been to bad last night if it hadn't been for that idiot who took us about 30 minutes to get rid of.
But yes the situation in Austria must be resolved - or OE will have an even easier (not sure that's possible) time gaining more provinses in Hungary/Balkans.
But yes the situation in Austria must be resolved - or OE will have an even easier (not sure that's possible) time gaining more provinses in Hungary/Balkans.
I would volunteer for being the new perm for Austria. Looks like a fun little game so far.
Waldzwerg said:I would volunteer for being the new perm for Austria. Looks like a fun little game so far.
In that case, you are the new perm.
I was about the post various suggestions how to solve the issue with Austria, but the most easiest one is simply add a new perm to the country and keep all the other players in their respective countries.
So, Waldzwerg is our new Austria.
Duma said:
with 14-15 players we often need a sub, so you would be most welcome to sub now and then!
Miozozny said:
Yes, but the vassals that were present at the scenario start were not removed after the first session (which was only 15 years).
Otherwise Poland wouldn't have the opportunity to DA Lithuania and France has a vassal stuck till 1527 (per scenario setup).
As for the rehosts,
The only unstable player in our setup was Maciej and we rehosted twice for him in the session. According to him, his new router has solved the trouble. Mind you, normally rehosts go a bit more smooth, if you don't have an imposter plaguing you
Maciej, if you keep dropping next session also, we need to find a new perm for Venice.
The only unstable player in our setup was Maciej and we rehosted twice for him in the session. According to him, his new router has solved the trouble. Mind you, normally rehosts go a bit more smooth, if you don't have an imposter plaguing you
Maciej, if you keep dropping next session also, we need to find a new perm for Venice.
DSYoungEsq said:
He entered the game with the same name as another player, trying to pick the same country as well.
IE, at a certain he entered the host room as cheech and picked England. After that the real Cheech arrived and I thought HE was the imposter, so I kicked him repeatedly out of the room
Apparently the guy knew which countries the players had. Must be one extra-ordinary frustrated indivdual since he kept waiting in the channel till we rehosted.
Rule 4:
Fair enough that i wasn't implemented after the first session, now however i believe it should be enforced.
Which means that:
OE loses Wallachia, Siebenbürgen and Algiers
Spain loses Portugal (if nodoby minds you can leave it, i'll become vassel at start of the session if not)
France loses Bourbonnais and Helvetia
Russia loses Ryazan and Pskov
Austria loses Gelre
Brandenburg loses Münster
Venice loses Siena
Not sure that Denmark has mp 50, so guess they keep Oldenburg.
Fair enough that i wasn't implemented after the first session, now however i believe it should be enforced.
Which means that:
OE loses Wallachia, Siebenbürgen and Algiers
Spain loses Portugal (if nodoby minds you can leave it, i'll become vassel at start of the session if not)
France loses Bourbonnais and Helvetia
Russia loses Ryazan and Pskov
Austria loses Gelre
Brandenburg loses Münster
Venice loses Siena
Not sure that Denmark has mp 50, so guess they keep Oldenburg.
Aladar said:
France cannot not DA bourbonnais before 1527, because of the scenario setup.
...which makes me realise that I should alter the scenario precisely of this manpower bug.
As for the other vassals, they will be removed if the country has more than 50 manpower indeed. But only if they could reasonable DA them per scenario setup.
Aladar said:
*points at rule 5*
BTW, did the imposter have the mod or can anyone join as long as they have 1.09 installed? Just wondering.
Aladar said:
The Ottoman Empire protests this! We gained Siebenburgen and Algiers by Event and so where unavoidable. We also began the game with Wallachia, 'tis not our fault!
Right, how backward do you want me to get? But i forgot the rule.
But can i have a month to annex ryzan ingame? Pskov would take me a bit longer since it hates me....so i understand that it should be unvassaled according to the rules
I know one should know the rules and all...but a little warning and i would have annexed them right away....and as you can see in my army numbers im not exactly using it for the mp
But can i have a month to annex ryzan ingame? Pskov would take me a bit longer since it hates me....so i understand that it should be unvassaled according to the rules
I know one should know the rules and all...but a little warning and i would have annexed them right away....and as you can see in my army numbers im not exactly using it for the mp
Everyone should be allowed to have 10 years time to DA a vassal, between session or not.
The rules importence is to prevent a long term abuse, not to weaken game play.
The rules importence is to prevent a long term abuse, not to weaken game play.
Last edited: