fix the linkStahlgewitter2 said:It's "Victoria 2" (working title). To be followed by HoI 3 to make a link from CKV -> EU III ->"Vicky2" -> HoI3
http://forum.paradoxplaza.com/forum...54&page=5&pp=21
I seriously hope it's vicky 2
-
We have updated our Community Code of Conduct. Please read through the new rules for the forum that are an integral part of Paradox Interactive’s User Agreement.
- Status
I seriously hope it's vicky 2
I want to believeRaczynski said:Guys, guys, do you seriously believe that was a serious post?
I am not sure, but if not, he can expect a SERIOUS beating.Raczynski said:Guys, guys, do you seriously believe that was a serious post?
Jayavarman said:I am not sure, but if not, he can expect a SERIOUS beating.
Indeed!
Random thought, but for some reason, I can't help but think that should a Classical period/Dark ages game came out, at least 1 crazy would use it to play an incredibly long game spanning from, say, 300 BC to 1963 AD. Just a thought.
Last edited:
Internet tough guy, are we?Jayavarman said:I am not sure, but if not, he can expect a SERIOUS beating.
Anyway, the page seems to have disappeared. Possibly deleted.
Jayavarman said:I am not sure, but if not, he can expect a SERIOUS beating.
Follow the advise of your custom title- relax.
maybe paradox is going to make a game in the future about swedish colonization of alpha centauri?
jacob-Lundgren said:maybe paradox is going to make a game in the future about swedish colonization of alpha centauri?
Try Minnesota.
I hope the next title is a new one and wish it is not based on some early period but the period after World War II i.e based on the Cold War. Paradox should move ahead in time rather than go back to the swords era. I hope they would move ahead and cover the real geopolitics after WWII to at least the present day. Otherwise I think it would be Victoria 2.
Martial-law said:I hope the next title is a new one and wish it is not based on some early period but the period after World War II i.e based on the Cold War. Paradox should move ahead in time rather than go back to the swords era. I hope they would move ahead and cover the real geopolitics after WWII to at least the present day. Otherwise I think it would be Victoria 2.
Well the problems with a province based system for the Cold War are beyond ridiculous, not to mention that no large scale war went on.
Basileios I said:Why not?
There are so little WW2-themed games on the market!
no please, not another ww2 game!
empire building games in real time, we got:
pax romana
great invasions
crusaders kings
europa universalis 3
victoria
HoI 2
supreme ruler 2010
what's next? :wacko:
pax romana
great invasions
crusaders kings
europa universalis 3
victoria
HoI 2
supreme ruler 2010
what's next? :wacko:
It shall be a Saving Private Ryan 3-d RTS game with geopolitical micromanagment MMOPRG with no online fees and it will start form the Medieval times and will go triugh CK, EU, Vicky, HoI and more.
Hm, I'll modify what seems to be a common voice and say a game starting in '45 and ending sometime in the late 90's would be amazing. However, I'm far more interested in the period as a market simulation than as a geopolitical simulation. It would be amazing to play a game that could properly simulate the rise of the Asian Tigers, for instance, and then follow through with a completely in-engine simulation of the subsequent economic contagion.
Something sort of Vicky-esque, I guess, but with a lot more emphasis on the capital and value side of things, which is something that Vicky sadly lacks. No matter how much people complain about Vicky's economic system being too 'complex', it's still incredibly primitive and pretty incapable of handling any sort of complex economy. Of course, eliminating a lot of the micro-management is important, as most economies aren't really micro-managed IRL, either. Naturally, though, if such a game did come about it would be...interesting to play the Soviets or any other centrally planned economy.
EDIT: And before I scare anybody with this talk of micro-management, I mean to imply that the game needs more complexity that occurs behind the scenes, as it were. Stuff that's hard-coded to properly model an economy and more realistic player inputs.
Something sort of Vicky-esque, I guess, but with a lot more emphasis on the capital and value side of things, which is something that Vicky sadly lacks. No matter how much people complain about Vicky's economic system being too 'complex', it's still incredibly primitive and pretty incapable of handling any sort of complex economy. Of course, eliminating a lot of the micro-management is important, as most economies aren't really micro-managed IRL, either. Naturally, though, if such a game did come about it would be...interesting to play the Soviets or any other centrally planned economy.
EDIT: And before I scare anybody with this talk of micro-management, I mean to imply that the game needs more complexity that occurs behind the scenes, as it were. Stuff that's hard-coded to properly model an economy and more realistic player inputs.
- Status