new multiplayer game: the quest for conquest

[unmerged(54131)]

The OE is usually the richest... so if you think it is not normal, well, then, my aplauses. Now now WOW, i understand that statement of yours as threatning, since after all we got a NAP for the following 15-20 years. And if you think the OE can make Spain "crumble", well, think again. Spain is not Austria or England: It can support WE and stab hits better then anyone. My provinces in the new world cant defect to anyone, and they cant declare independence either. While the provinces of the OE... Their WE in core provinces was 3 or so already...

But hell, again, the OE being the richest isnt a surprise... It is a surprise, that they were the only ones who have always been dowing us, and their income is high... England, has been at peace the whole game, and only did a player war so far (after 200 years into the game), and is not even richer then Spain... That IS a surprise.

Also, Free trade, makes merchants more expensive. But nations with free trade, will find their merchants lasting in their cots longer. Or so i saw in some FAQ about Merchant's sickness...

Hehehe, I hope you are not serious.. should I once again word by word explain everything ?? Don't know.. you are mad ploter EGO.. When I was saying that I'm suprised that OE is richest it was IRONY- Check in Dictonary.. so half of your post can be cuted off.. England was in peace yes.. it was my personal decision. SO ? You are suprised that England isnt richer than Spain, so this is unusual, so in straight line of thinking you did good job, you are an expert player cose England in 1650 isn't richer than SPAIN.. Well done.. BRAVO ! OE attacking HAB for Hungary and SPAIN for domination in MEDITERRANEAN SEA suprised ?We have no NAP EGO..! If I understand good you think we have NAP, besides I wasn't threating It's all about your imagination.. And lets back to the beginning to your first post since 3 dayz... where you were teaching me that mercantilism means less menpower for you.. lol that was funny but I wasn't suprised cose you are not reading posts mate that is why you are making such mistakes, and that is why from small mercantilism/land mistake we are arguing once again.. I hope you are happy that another time evil WOW responded for your next senseless "post attack"
I won't answer for another post.. sorry but I have to, to end this one for good.

 

[unmerged(60002)]

:rofl:
Uhm I`d like to have an answer from the GM`s to see if i get those slider moves I asked so that I can plan ahead...

thx

 

[BurningEGO]

Erm WOW, i never said that mercantilism decreased manpower... Such a thing is not true, anyway... mercantilism has nothing to do with manpower.

And yes, we do have a NAP. You agreed to a NAP with bradenburg as the peace proposal. Which will end in about 15-20 years iirc.

 

[unmerged(34338)]

Erm WOW, i never said that mercantilism decreased manpower... Such a thing is not true, anyway... mercantilism has nothing to do with manpower.

And yes, we do have a NAP. You agreed to a NAP with bradenburg as the peace proposal. Which will end in about 15-20 years iirc.

Ehm...you play Spain. Not Brandenburg.

 

[BurningEGO]

Erm, NAP included Spain/Austria from what Bodvar told me.

 

[unmerged(53580)]

Erm, NAP included Spain/Austria from what Bodvar told me.

NAP is between England/Brandenburg and their allies. Currently you're out of my alliance so wether you're covered by it or not could be a matter of discussion. As long as you're in my alliance, the nap will cover you.

 

[unmerged(54131)]

NAP is between England/Brandenburg and their allies. Currently you're out of my alliance so wether you're covered by it or not could be a matter of discussion. As long as you're in my alliance, the nap will cover you.

Brandenburg was not in official alliance with Spain while we was signing that NAP so I dont think that inviting Spain in that agreement will change anything.. Besides there is no need to bodering Brandenburg about their NAP, cose there is no reason to do that..

 

[unmerged(53580)]

Brandenburg was not in official alliance with Spain while we was signing that NAP so I dont think that inviting Spain in that agreement will change anything.. Besides there is no need to bodering Brandenburg about their NAP, cose there is no reason to do that..

ehem, Spain was allied with Austria and me in 1640. check the stats.

 

[unmerged(54131)]

ehem, Spain was allied with Austria and me in 1640. check the stats.

Indeed.. My fault.. Luckly they are not right now So I can declare trade war against them :wacko:

 

[BurningEGO]

Martmol, i already said this one week ago, but since i was ghosted, i missed my Olivares event, which grant me good monarch skills. If you fire this at the present, i will miss 5 years of good monarch skills, but i dont care. If you do not fire it now, i will request that the event fires when i have my next monarch. And that is in 1665.

EDITED: shouldnt be hard to trigger it... just load up the save in SP mode, press F12 and write "event 3711".

 

[unmerged(18425)]

Kick EGO's sorry ass Miozozny!

 

[BurningEGO]

That is what you wished FAL! Today, i am going to reveal to the world what the nickname FAL means! If i win of course. I am sure Mioz will allow me to win just that we know what FAL means.

 

[unmerged(53580)]

That is what you wished FAL! Today, i am going to reveal to the world what the nickname FAL means! If i win of course. I am sure Mioz will allow me to win just that we know what FAL means.

So the only way you can win is for mioz to let him?
Where's your confidence?

 

[unmerged(34338)]

Kick EGO's sorry ass Miozozny!

I will do what I can

 

[BurningEGO]

Bah, if there was any doubt about a restart, this session just proved it how badly it is needed. I hope we are restarting this... France nearly wiped, Sweden going to be annexed, very weak russia, plus an OE that just likes to pick Spain for their little butcheries...

Also, FAL, it is time to reveal the world what your nickname means... Mioz didnt manage to get a province from me. However, i do congratulate him in his performance.

 

[unmerged(20663)]

France will never surrender! Austrian dogs wont see a single day of peace, ever again!

 

[unmerged(34338)]

Bah, if there was any doubt about a restart, this session just proved it how badly it is needed. I hope we are restarting this... France nearly wiped, Sweden going to be annexed, very weak russia, plus an OE that just likes to pick Spain for their little butcheries...

Also, FAL, it is time to reveal the world what your nickname means... Mioz didnt manage to get a province from me. However, i do congratulate him in his performance.

You were saved by Austria At least I got some provs from them

 

[unmerged(60474)]

This BB attack might be sneak, but rational, so I understand. Bodvar just wanted to use the land CRT advantage as soon as he prepared his navy. However I don't like this ally peace&dow trick. I think it's unfair and should be banned by GMs for following games.

It might seem that it's an overwhelming defeat for me, but actually it turned on a hair. My naval tech was better than BB, though I didn't expect such a quick attack, I didn't rush a naval production and bang, I was outnumbered on sea. When it comes to land, it was clear that I won't have a chance alone. If I could meet BB with a close number of ships, I'm sure I could win that war and even gain some land. He didn't spend any time and wait for me to have a brand-new strong king and an able admiral.

BTW, there wasn't anything wrong made by Russia (maybe it seems so as WOW says) In reality, he joined the war and fought in Estonia with me against BB. He was even about to lose a province. Then he switched to a defensive stance, which is quite rational because of his tech disadvantage.

In the next session, maybe I'll be annexed or left with few provinces, but restarting the game or not are both OK for me. I won't say "restart, restart", even though I lost. 'Cause from my previous experiences, I know how much you feel bad when your victory is interrupted (So OE, BB and Austria wants to continue, i guess. It's obvious that I'm favor of restarting too).

 

[unmerged(34338)]

This BB attack might be sneak, but rational, so I understand. Bodvar just wanted to use the land CRT advantage as soon as he prepared his navy. However I don't like this ally peace&dow trick. I think it's unfair and should be banned by GMs for following games.

It might seem that it's an overwhelming defeat for me, but actually it turned on a hair. My naval tech was better than BB, though I didn't expect such a quick attack, I didn't rush a naval production and bang, I was outnumbered on sea. When it comes to land, it was clear that I won't have a chance alone. If I could meet BB with a close number of ships, I'm sure I could win that war and even gain some land. He didn't spend any time and wait for me to have a brand-new strong king and an able admiral.

BTW, there wasn't anything wrong made by Russia (maybe it seems so as WOW says) In reality, he joined the war and fought in Estonia with me against BB. He was even about to lose a province. Then he switched to a defensive stance, which is quite rational because of his tech disadvantage.

In the next session, maybe I'll be annexed or left with few provinces, but restarting the game or not are both OK for me. I won't say "restart, restart", even though I lost. 'Cause from my previous experiences, I know how much you feel bad when your victory is interrupted (So OE, BB and Austria wants to continue, i guess. It's obvious that I'm favor of restarting too).

Well, I would vote for ending as well. And I probably won't join a restart.

 

[unmerged(54131)]

That game is freakly unbalanced.. and I hope that Brandenburg and Habsburgs wont feel like a great winners while they used weakness of France and Sweden.. They can be proud that they were able to defend those gainings.. actually Bra shouldnt. I really dont like Brodvar way of playing, firstly I was impressed about his progress in India and in world trade, but then that sneaky attack on me and now that ( I mean second attack on Sweden) It's not right to treat in that way much more weaker nation, and in meanwhile destroying game for person which is probably playing first time serious Multi Player game.. Maybe it is to late but I know that power of that Spa/Hab/Bra alliance is in official Alliance.. mostly they were in it that's why in case of having such official alliance other nations should create other official. Many times I was lied and shame on me that I belived.. first of all I could attack Spain at start of that game which I didnt cose I belived them.. Secondly Brandenburg "friendship NAP" was so friendly that many times I wanted to break it. Although I'm voting for continuing..